Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of a new qPCR tool for the detection and identification of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii by an international test performance study

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid and reliable tools for detection and identification of plant parasitic nematodes are needed to prevent the introduction and spread of quarantine nematodes. A fast and simple DNA extraction method for target nematodes in nematode suspensions obtained from soil samples and a new quantitative real-time PCR method (qPCR) for the specific detection, identification and potential quantification of M. enterolobii were tested in an inter-laboratory comparison (ring test) to allow for a thorough evaluation of these molecular diagnostic tools. A test performance study involving seven laboratories was conducted to validate the developed protocols and to identify possible difficulties when implemented by diagnostic laboratories or national reference centers. Validation included test performance in terms of accuracy, analytical specificity, analytical sensitivity, repeatability, and reproducibility as defined by European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) standard PM7/98. All positive and negative results for detection, identification and specificity were consistent between different laboratories despite different equipment used. Accuracy of real-time PCR was 100 % because test results and accepted reference values were in agreement. Analytical sensitivity results also matched between laboratories independent of the equipment used. The smallest amount of target DNA tested, two second-stage juveniles of M. enterolobii in a background of 500 non-target nematodes, was reliably detected by all labs. In addition, the repeatability and reproducibility of test results between laboratories was 100 %, even at the limit of detection. Thus, the inter-laboratory comparison showed the robustness of the developed methods and confirmed the in-house validation data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agudelo, P., Lewis, S. A., & Fortnum, B. L. (2011). Validation of a real-time polymerase chain.

  • Anonymous (2010). EPPO standard PM 7/98 (1). Specific requirements for laboratories preparing accreditation for a plant pest diagnostic activity. EPPO Bulletin, 40, 5–22.

  • Anonymous (2011). EPPO standard PM 7/103. Meloidogyne enterolobii. EPPO Bulletin, 41, 329–339.

  • Anonymous (2014). Meloidogyne enterolobii. EPPO Bulletin, 44, 159–163.

  • Anthoine, G., Ladeveze, L., Gaar, V., Viane, N., & Hockland, S. (2008). Quality requirements for accreditation and standard operating procedures: what could be a reference method for quarantine nematode detection? 5th International Congress of Nematology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 8 July-31 August, 2007.

  • Berry, S. D., Fargette, M., Spaull, V. W., Morand, S., & Cadet, P. (2008). Detection and quantification of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica), lesion nematode (Pratylenchus zeae) and dagger nematode (Xiphinema elongatum) parasites of sugarcane using real-time PCR. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 22, 168–176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V., Wishart, J., Fargette, M., Berthier, K., & Phillips, M. S. (2002). Mitochondrial DNA differences distinguishing Meloidogyne mayaguensis from the major species of tropical root-knot nematodes. Nematology, 4, 773–781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brito, J. A., Stanley, J. D., Mendes, M. L., Cetintas, R., & Dickson, D. W. (2007). Host status of selected cultivated plants to Meloidogyne mayaguensis in Florida. Nematropica, 37, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagnone-Sereno, P. (2012). Meloidogyne enterolobii (= M. mayaguensis): profile of an emerging, highly pathogenic, root-knot nematode species. Nematology, 14, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetintas, R., Kaur, R., Brito, J. A., Mendes, M. L., Nyczepir, A. P., & Dickson, D. W. (2007). Pathogenicity and reproductive potential of Meloidogyne mayaguensis and M. floridensis compared with three common Meloidogyne spp. Nematropica, 37, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Weerdt, M., Kox, L., Waeyenberge, L., Viaene, N., & Zijlstra, C. (2011). A real-time PCR assay to identify Meloidogyne minor. Journal of Phytopathology, 159, 80–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Den Nijs, L., & van den Berg, W. (2013). The added value of proficiency tests: choosing the proper method for extracting Meloidogyne second-stage juveniles from soil. Nematology, 15, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elling, A. (2013). Major emerging problems with minor Meloidogyne species. Phytopathology, 103, 1092–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gamel, S., Huchet, E., Le Roux-Nio, A., & Anthoine, G. (2014). Assessment of PCR-based tools for the specific identification of some temperate Meloidogyne species including M. chitwoodi, M. fallax and M. minor. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 138, 807–817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holterman, M., van der Wurff, A., van den Elsen, S., van Megen, H., Bongers, T., Holovachov, O., Bakker, J., & Helder, J. (2006). Phylum-wide analysis of SSU rDNA reveals deep phylogenetic relationships among nematodes and accelerated evolution toward crown clades. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 1792–1800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holterman, M. H. M., Oggenfuss, M., Frey, J. E., & Kiewnick, S. (2012). Evaluation of high-resolution melting curve analysis as a new tool for root-knot nematode diagnostics. Journal of Phytopathology, 160, 59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D. J., & Handoo, Z. A. (2009). Taxonomy, identification and principal species. In R. N. Perry, M. Moens, & J. L. Starr (Eds.), Root-knot nematodes (pp. 55–97). Wallingford: CAB International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karssen, G., Liao, J. L., Kan, Z., van Heese, E., & den Nijs, L. (2012). On the species status of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne mayaguensis Rammah & Hirschmann, 1988. ZooKeys, 181, 67–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., & Frey, J. E. (2014). Swiss NEMA-BOL: barcoding of Swiss soil nematodes - a proof of concept. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 447, 532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., Karssen, G., Brito, J. A., Oggenfuss, M., & Frey, J. E. (2008). First report of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii on tomato and cucumber in Switzerland. Plant Disease, 92, 1370–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., Dessimoz, M., & Franck, L. (2009). Effects of the Mi-1 and the N root-knot nematode-resistance gene on infection and reproduction of Meloidogyne enterolobii on tomato and pepper cultivars. Journal of Nematology, 41, 134–139.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., Wolf, S., Knuth, P., & Hallmann, J. (2011). Reproduction potential of multiple Meloidogyne spp. populations on resistant tomato and cucumber root-stock. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 118, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., Wolf, S., Willareth, M., & Frey, J. E. (2013). Identification of the tropical root-knot nematode species Meloidogyne incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria using a multiplex PCR assay. Nematology, 15, 891–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., Holterman, M., van den Elsen, S., van Megen, H., Frey, J. E., & Helder, J. (2014). Comparison of two short DNA barcoding loci (COI and COII) and two longer ribosomal DNA genes (SSU & LSU rRNA) for specimen identification among quarantine root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) and their close relatives. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 140, 97–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewnick, S., Frey, J. E., & Braun-Kiewnick, A. (2015). Development and validation of LNA-based quantitative real-time PCR assays for detection and identification of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in complex DNA backgrounds. Phytopathology. doi:10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0364-R.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onkendi, E. M., & Moleleki, L. N. (2013). Detection of Meloidogyne enterolobii in potatoes in South Africa and phylogenetic analysis based on intergenic region and the mitochondrial DNA sequences. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 136, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez-Suarez, A., Rosas-Hernandez, L., Alcasio, S., & Powers, T. O. (2014). First report of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii, parasitizing watermelon from Veracruz, Mexico. Plant Disease, 98, 428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybarczyk-Mydłowska, K., Mooyman, P., van Megen, H., van den Elsen, S., Vervoort, M., Veenhuizen, P., van Doorn, J., Dees, R., Karssen, G., Bakker, J., & Helder, H. (2012). Small subunit ribosomal DNA-based phylogenetic analysis of foliar nematodes (Aphelenchoides spp.) and their quantitative detection in complex DNA backgrounds. Phytopathology, 102, 1153–1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tigano, M., De Siqueira, K., Castagnone-Sereno, P., Mulet, K., Queiroz, P., Dos Santos, M., & Carneiro, R. (2010). Genetic diversity of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii and development of a SCAR marker for this guava-damaging species. Plant Pathology, 59, 1054–1061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vossenberg, B. T. L. H., Westenberg, M., & Bonants, P. J. M. (2013). DNA barcoding as an identification tool for selected EU-regulated plant pests: an international collaborative test performance study among 14 laboratories. EPPO Bulletin, 43, 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, W., Hartsema, O., & den Nijs, L. (2013). Statistical analysis of nematode counts from interlaboratory proficiency tests. Nematology, 16, 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vervoort, M. T. W., Vonk, J. A., Mooijman, P. J. W., Van den Elsen, S. J. J., Van Megen, H. H. B., Veenhuizen, P., Landeweert, R., Bakker, J., Mulder, C., & Helder, J. (2012). SSU ribosomal DNA-based monitoring of nematode assemblages reveals distinct seasonal fluctuations within evolutionary heterogeneous feeding guilds. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e47555. doi:10.1371/journal.- pone.0047555.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. F., Xiao, S., Huang, Y. K., Zhou, X., Zhang, S. S., & Liu, G. K. (2014). First report of Meloidogyne enterolobii on carrot in China. Plant Disease, 98, 1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, W. M., Koenning, S. R., Zhuo, K., & Liao, J. L. (2013). First report of Meloidogyne enterolobii on cotton and soybean in North Carolina, United States. Plant Disease, 97, 1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zijlstra, C., & Van Hoof, R. (2006). A multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (TaqMan) assay for the simultaneous detection of Meloidogyne chitwoodi and M. fallax. Phytopathology, 96, 1255–1262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research project was performed within the EUPHRESCO II framework, project “Development and validation of innovative diagnostic tools for detection and identification of the quarantine nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii in support of integrated plant protection strategies in the EU member states”, via a non-competitive funding mechanism. We thank all colleagues for sharing nematode populations and the Swiss Federal Office of Agriculture as well as the Belgian Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Kiewnick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braun-Kiewnick, A., Viaene, N., Folcher, L. et al. Assessment of a new qPCR tool for the detection and identification of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii by an international test performance study. Eur J Plant Pathol 144, 97–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0754-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0754-0

Keywords

Navigation