Abstract
Parity is associated with mortality among middle-aged women, while substantially less is known about this relationship for men and the elderly. Using the census-based Israel Longitudinal Mortality Study (ILMS) II (1995–2004) we sought to examine the parity–mortality relationship among men and women, middle-aged and elderly. In our study cohort of 71,733 married men and 62,822 married women ages 45–89 years at baseline, 19,437 deaths were reported. Mortality differentials by parity were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted stepwise for age, origin, education and number of rooms. Analyzes were carried out for middle-aged (45–64 years) and elderly (65–89 years) men and women separately. We observed a non-linear relationship between parity and mortality for all individuals even after adjustment for demographic and socio-economic variables. In fully adjusted models, for example, nulliparous middle-aged women experienced the highest mortality risks (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.57, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.24, 1.98) followed by those with one child (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.10, 1.51). These results were attenuated somewhat for nulliparous older women (HR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.11, 1.41). The detrimental effects of low and high parity on mortality among both men and women suggest a non pregnancy-related pathway that is likely mediated by biological and psychosocial factors and other lifestyle characteristics that have long-term consequences into older ages. Further research is warranted to examine the effects of parity by specific cause of death.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CVD:
-
Cardiovascular disease
- HR:
-
Hazard ratio
- ILMS:
-
Israel Longitudinal Mortality Study
- SEP:
-
Socio-economic position
References
Grundy E, Tomassini C. Fertility history and health in later life: a record linkage study in England and Wales. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:217–28. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.046.
Silvera SAN, Miller AB, Rohan TE. Hormonal and reproductive factors and pancreatic cancer risk: a prospective cohort study. Pancreas. 2005;30:369–74. doi:10.1097/01.mpa.0000160301.59319.ba.
Ness RB, Harris T, Cobb J, Flegal KM, Kelsey JL, Balanger A, et al. Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1528–33. doi:10.1056/NEJM199305273282104.
Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Family relationships, social support and subjective life expectancy. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43:469–89. doi:10.2307/3090238.
Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/parity. Accessed June 7, 2007.
Kotler P, Wingard DL. The effect of occupational, marital and parental roles on mortality: the Alameda County Study. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:607–12. doi:10.2105/AJPH.79.5.607.
Lund R, Due P, Modvig J, Holstein BE, Damsgaard MT, Andersen PK. Cohabitation and marital status as predictors of mortality—an eight year follow-up study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:673–9. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00219-2.
Manor O, Eisenbach Z, Israeli A, Friedlander Y. Mortality differentials among women: the Israel Longitudinal Mortality Study. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1175–88. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00024-1.
Koski-Rahikkala H, Pouta A, Pietilainen K, Hartikainen AL. Does parity affect mortality among parous women? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:968–73. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.044735.
Dekker JM, Schouten EG. Number of pregnancies and risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1893–4. doi:10.1056/NEJM199312163292515. letter.
Kvale G, Heuch I, Nilssen S. Parity in relation to mortality and cancer incidence: a prospective study of Norwegian women. Int J Epidemiol. 1994;23:691–9. doi:10.1093/ije/23.4.691.
Hinkula M, Kauppila A, Nayha S, Pukkala E. Cause-specific mortality of grand multiparous women in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:367–73. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj048.
Kravdal O. Children, family and cancer survival in Norway. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:261–6. doi:10.1002/ijc.11071.
Kravdal O, Hansen S. The importance of childbearing for Hodgkin’s disease: new evidence from incidence and mortality models. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:737–43. doi:10.1093/ije/25.4.737.
Lund E. Number of children and death from hormone-dependent cancers. Int J Cancer. 1990;46:998–1000. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910460608.
Jacobsen BK, Vollset SE, Kvale G. Do reproductive factors influence colorectal cancer survival? J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1119–22. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(95)00009-S.
Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF. The effect of family history of cancer, religion, parity and migrant status on survival in colorectal cancer. The Melbourne colorectal cancer study. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:1484–7. doi:10.1016/0959-8049(92)90549-H.
Kravdal O. Is the relationship between childbearing and cancer incidence due to biology or lifestyle? Examples of the importance of using data on men. Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24:477–84. doi:10.1093/ije/24.3.477.
Hibbard JH, Pope CR. Effect of domestic and occupational roles on morbidity and mortality. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:805–11. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90306-W.
Kobrin FE, Hendershot G. Do family ties reduce mortality? Evidence from the United States 1966–68. J Marriage Fam. 1977;39:737–45. doi:10.2307/350478.
Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E, Wingard DL. The relationship between multiparity and lipoprotein levels in older women. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:761–7. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90053-P.
Lewis CE, Funkhouser E, Raczynski JM, Sidney S, Bild DE, Howard BV. Adverse effect of pregnancy on high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in young adult women. The CARDIA Study. Coronary artery risk development in young adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:247–54.
Ness RB, Kramer RA, Flegal KM. Gravidity, blood pressure, and hypertension among white women in the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Epidemiology. 1993;4:303–9. doi:10.1097/00001648-199307000-00005.
Palmer JR, Wise LA, Horton NJ, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Dual effect of parity on breast cancer risk in African-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:478–83.
Macintyre S. The effects of family position and status on health. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:453–64. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90338-Q.
Wyke S, Ford G. Competing explanations for associations between marital status and health. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34:523–32. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90208-8.
Beral V. Long term effects of childbearing on health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985;39:343–6. doi:10.1136/jech.39.4.343.
Doblhammer G. Reproductive history and mortality later in life: a comparative study of England and Wales and Austria. Popul Stud (Camb). 2000;54:169–76. doi:10.1080/713779087.
Westendorp RG, Kirkwood TB. Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success. Nature. 1998;396:743–6. doi:10.1038/25519.
Lund E, Arnesen E, Borgan JK. Pattern of childbearing and mortality in married women—a national prospective study from Norway. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990;44:237–40. doi:10.1136/jech.44.3.237.
Eisenbach Z, Manor O, Peritz E, Hite Y. The Israel Longitudinal Mortality Study—differential mortality in Israel 1983–1992: objectives, materials, methods and preliminary results. Isr J Med Sci. 1997;33:794–807.
Feldman C, Eisenbach Z, Manor O. Mortality differentials by education(Hebrew). Jerusalem: Israel Central Bureau of Statistics; 2003.
Jaffe DH, Eisenbach Z, Neumark YD, Manor O. Educational inequalities in mortality among Israeli Jews: changes over time in a dynamic population. Health Place. 2008;14:287–98. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.07.003.
Shuval J, Anson O. Social structure and health in Israel. Jerusalem: Magnes Press; 2001.
Jaffe DH, Eisenbach Z, Neumark YD, Manor O. Does living in a religiously affiliated neighborhood lower mortality? Ann Epidemiol. 2005;15:804–10. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.09.014.
Manor O, Eisenbach Z, Friedlander Y, Kark JD. Educational differentials in mortality from cardiovascular disease among men and women: the Israel Longitudinal Mortality Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:453–60. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.10.011.
ICBS. Statistical abstract of Israel, 2002. Jerusalem: Israel Central Bureau of Statistics; 2002.
Hall DM. Children in an ageing society. Br Med J. 1999;319:1356–8.
Kravdal O, Hansen S. Hodgkin’s disease: the protective effect of childbearing. Int J Cancer. 1993;55:909–14. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910550606.
Zhang Z, Hayward MD. Childlessness and the psychological well-being of older persons. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56:S311–20.
Seeman TE, Kaplan GA, Knudsen L, Cohen R, Guralnik J. Social network ties and mortality among the elderly in the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:714–23.
Hurt LS, Ronsmans C, Thomas SL. The effect of number of births on women’s mortality: systematic review of the evidence for women who have completed their childbearing. Popul Stud (Camb). 2006;60:55–71. doi:10.1080/00324720500436011.
Jacobsen BK. Relationships between childbearing and some food and alcohol habits: the Nordland Health Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1996;12:327–30. doi:10.1007/BF00145293.
Neumark YD, Rahav G, Jaffe DH. Socio-economic status and binge drinking in Israel. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;69:15–21. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00248-X.
Grundy E, Holt G. Adult life experiences and health in early old age in Great Britain. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1061–74. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00023-X.
Kroman N, Wohlfahrt J, Andersen KW, Mouridsen HT, Westergaard T, Melbye M. Parity, age at first childbirth and the prognosis of primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1998;78:1529–33.
Manor O, Eisenbach Z. Mortality after spousal loss: are there socio-demographic differences? Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):405–13. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00046-1.
Acknowledgments
Data were created by grant 93-00015/2 from the US–Israel Binational Science Foundation and grant 03/120 from the Israel National Institute for Health Policy and Health Services Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaffe, D.H., Neumark, Y.D., Eisenbach, Z. et al. Parity-related mortality: shape of association among middle-aged and elderly men and women. Eur J Epidemiol 24, 9–16 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-008-9310-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-008-9310-y