Skip to main content
Log in

Reproducibility of the past year and historical self-administered total physical activity questionnaire among older women

  • Methods
  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have evaluated the reliability of a self-administered current and historical physical activity questionnaire (PAQ) among middle-aged and elderly women. We evaluated the reliability of a self-administered PAQ designed to assess total (24 h) current and historical physical activity at age 15, 30, and 50 years, which was completed by a subgroup of 303 women aged 56–75 years from the Swedish Mammography Cohort (SMC). Total physical activity covered occupational and household activity as well as walking/bicycling, exercise, and inactivity (sitting watching TV/reading). Reliabilities (1-year test–retest) of continuous activity measures in metabolic equivalents were evaluated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); classification consistency was evaluated using sensitivity and specificity statistics. The ICC for total current physical activity was 0.69; for specific types of activities the ICC ranged from 0.49 to 0.59; for historical physical activity, the reliabilities for total activity ranged from 0.75 for age 50 to 0.81 for age 30 years, being substantial for occupational activities (ICC = 0.73–0.75), and fair to moderate for inactivity (ICC = 0.31–0.60). These data indicate that the PAQ used in the SMC is a satisfactory and reproducible measure of current and historical physical activity, for total as well as for different types of activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PAQ:

Physical activity questionnaire

SMC:

Swedish Mammography Cohort

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

PA:

Physical activity

References

  1. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS (2006) Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Cmaj 174:801–809

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chasan-Taber L, Erickson JB, McBride JW, Nasca PC, et al (2002) Reproducibility of a self-administered lifetime physical activity questionnaire among female college alumnae. Am J Epidemiol 155:282–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kriska AM, Sandler RB, Cauley JA, LaPorte RE, et al (1988) The assessment of historical physical activity and its relation to adult bone parameters. Am J Epidemiol 127:1053–1063

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Bryant HE (1998) The lifetime total physical activity questionnaire: development and reliability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:266–274

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson SC, Bergkvist L, Wolk A (2005) Magnesium intake in relation to risk of colorectal cancer in women. Jama 293:86–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, et al (2006) Age and temporal trends of total physical activity among Swedish women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, et al (2000) Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:S498–S504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Norman A, Bellocco R, Bergstrom A, Wolk A (2001) Validity and reproducibility of self-reported total physical activity–differences by relative weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25:682–688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. StataCorp (2005) Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX

  10. Greenland S (1996) Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J Epidemiol 25:1107–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Neilson HK, Matthews CE, et al (2006) Reliability and validity of the past year total physical activity questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 163:959–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matthews CE, Shu XO, Yang G, Jin F, et al (2003) Reproducibility and validity of the Shanghai Women’s Health Study physical activity questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 158:1114–1122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wareham NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Mitchell J, et al (2002) Validity and repeatability of the EPIC-Norfolk Physical Activity Questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol 31:168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolf AM, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Manson JE, et al (1994) Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol 23:991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Swedish Council for Working life and Social Research (FAS), the Swedish Research Council/Longitudinal studies, World Cancer Research Fund International, and the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Orsini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orsini, N., Bellocco, R., Bottai, M. et al. Reproducibility of the past year and historical self-administered total physical activity questionnaire among older women. Eur J Epidemiol 22, 363–368 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-9102-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-9102-1

Keywords

Navigation