Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of complex shape of pier foundation exposure on time development of scour

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local pier scour has been recognized as one of the most significant causes of bridge failures. Despite numerous studies on the subject of local pier scour have been conducted, there remain problems in accurate scour prediction because almost of the past studies have focused only on scour depth around simple shape of a bridge pier with or without considering their time development, even though prototype bridges usually have complex pier configurations. Thus, the objective of this study is investigation of the scour process around complex shape of pier including various shape of foundations and columns other than cylindrical shape over time for the purpose of understanding the relationships between hydraulic variables and resulting time development of scour. In this study, two field sites in Georgia, USA were selected, and corresponding scale-down bridge models and river geometries were fabricated in a hydraulic laboratory to address objectives of this study. Three different sizes of sediment and several geometric scales of bridge pier models were used to investigate the effect of relative sediment size, which is defined as the ratio of the pier width to the median sediment size. Through the visualization experiment, it is observed that exposure of complex shape of pier footing has important role for the temporal variations of scour depth over time. In addition to the quantitative visualization analysis, based on the experimental results, scouring rate formulas are suggested with the help of dimensionless, effective flow work concept according to the value of the relative sediment size. Findings in this research can be used to improve scour prediction methods that currently tend to overpredict bridge scour depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arneson LA, Zevenbergen LW, Lagasse PF, Clopper PE (2012) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18 (HEC-18): Evaluating scour at bridges, 5th edn

  2. Miller W (2003) Model for the time rate of local sediment scour at a cylindrical structure. Archival Material, University of Florida, Book

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gotvald AJ, McCallum BE (2010) Epic flooding in Georgia

  4. Khosronejad A, Diplas P, Angelidis D, Zhang Z, Heydari N, Sotiropoulos F (2020) Scour depth prediction at the base of longitudinal walls: a combined experimental, numerical, and field study. Environ Fluid Mech 20:459–478

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhuri S, Singh S, Debnath K, Manik M (2018) Pier scour within long contraction in cohesive sediment bed. Environ Fluid Mech 18:417–441

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman SE (2005) Clearwater local scour at complex piers. J Hydraul Eng 131(4):330–334

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ettema R, Kirkil G, Muste MV (2006) Similitute of large-scale turbulence in experiments on local scour at cylinders. J Hydraul Eng 132(1):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Melville BW (1997) Pier and abutment scour: integrated approach. J Hydraul Eng 123(2):125–136

    Google Scholar 

  9. Melville BW, Chiew YM (1999) Time scale for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 125(1):59

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oliveto G, Hagger WH (2002) Temporal evolution of clear-water pier and abutment scour. J Hydraul Eng 128(9):811–820

    Google Scholar 

  11. Raudkivi AJ, Ettema R (1983) Clear-water scour at cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Eng 109(3):338–350

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheppard DM, Odeh M, Glasser T (2004) Large scale clear-water local pier scour experiments. J Hydraul Eng 130(10):957–963

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hong S, Sturm T, Stoesser T (2015) Clear water abutment scour in a compound channel for extreme hydrologic events. J Hydraul Eng 141(6):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hong S, Lee SO (2018) Insight of bridge scour during extreme hydrologic events by laboratory model studies. KSCE J Civ Eng 22(8):12871–12879

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SO, Hong S (2019) Turbulence characteristics before and after scour upstream of a scaled-down bridge pier model. Water 11(1900):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pu J, Lim SY (2014) Efficient numerical computation and experimental study of temporally long equilibrium scour development around abutment. Environ Fluid Mech 14:69–86

    Google Scholar 

  17. Keshavarzi A, Melville B, Ball J (2014) Three-dimensional analysis of coherent turbulent flow structure around a single circular bridge pier. Environ Fluid Mech 14:821–847

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bauri K, Sarkar A (2019) Turbulent burst-sweep events around fully submerged vertical square cylinder over plane bed. Environ Fluid Mech 19:645–666

    Google Scholar 

  19. Durafour M, Jarno A, Le Bot S, Lafite R, Marin F (2015) Bedload transport for heterogeneous sediments. Environ Fluid Mech 15:731–751

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carstens MR (1966) “Similarity laws for localized scour.” American Society of Civil Engineers Proceedings. J Hydraul Div 92(HY3):13

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shen HW, Schneider VR, Karaki SS (1969) Local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Div 95(HY6):1919–1940

    Google Scholar 

  22. Torsethaugen K (1975) Lokal erosjon ved store konstruksjoner modellforsok. Vassdrags-og Havne-laboratoriet, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cunha LV (1975) Time evolution of local scour. In: Proceedings 16th congress, IAHR, Sao Paulo, Braz, pp 285–299

  24. Zanke U (1982) Kolke am Pfeiler in richtungskonstanter Strömung und unter Welleneinfluß. Mitteilungen desFranzius-Instituts für Wasserbau-und Küsteningenieurwes. der Univ. Hann. 54:381–416

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pizarro A, Manfreda S, Tubaldi E (2020) The science behind scour at bridge foundations: a review. Water 12(374):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dey S (1999) Time-variation of scour in the vicinity of circular piers. Proc Inst Civ Eng Water Marit Energy 136:67–75

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ettema R (1980) Scour at bridge piers. No. 216, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

  28. Graf WH (1995) Local scour around piers. In: Lausanne EPFD (ed) Annual report, Laboratoire de Recherches Hydrauliques, Lausanne, Switzerland, B.33.1–B.33.8

  29. Oliveto G, Hager WH (2005) Further results to time-dependent local scour at bridge elements. J Hydraul Eng 131(2):97–105

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kothyari U, Hager WH, Oliveto G (2007) Generalized approach for clear-water scour at bridge foundation elements. J Hydraul Eng 133(11):1229–1240

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chang W, Lai J, Yen C (2004) Evolution of scour depth at circular bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 130(9):905–913

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kothyari U, Kumar A (2012) Temporal variation of scour around circular compound piers. J Hydraul Eng 138(11):945–957

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lanca R, Fael C, Maia R, Pego J, Cardoso A (2013) Clear-water scour at comparatively large cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Eng 139(11):1117–1125

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yao W, An H, Draper S, Cheng L, Harris J (2018) Experimental investigation of local scour around submerged piles in steady current. Coast Eng 142:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pandey M, Sharma PK, Ahmad Z, Singh UK (2018) Experimental investigation of clear-water temporal scour variation around bridge pier in gravel. Environ Fluid Mech 18:871–890

    Google Scholar 

  36. Link O, Castillo C, Pizarro A, Rojas A, Ettmer B, Escauriaza C, Manfreda S (2017) A model of bridge pier scour during flood waves. J Hydraul Res 55(3):310–323

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pizarro A, Samela C, Fiorentino M, Link O, Manfreda S (2017) BRISENT: an entropy-based model for bridge-pier scour estimation under complex hydraulic scenarios. Water 9(889):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  38. Raudkivi AJ (1986) Functional trends of scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 112(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sheppard DM, Miller W (2006) Live-bed local pier scour experiments. J Hydraul Eng 132(7):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  40. Melville BW, Sutherland AJ (1988) Design method for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 114(10):1210–1226

    Google Scholar 

  41. Melville BW, Coleman SE (2000) Bridge Scource. Water Resources Publication, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lee SO, Sturm TW (2009) Effect of sediment size scaling on physical modeling of bridge pier scour. J Hydraul Eng 135(10):793–802

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ferraro D, Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Cardoso AH (2013) Effects of pile cap thickness on the maximum scour depth at a complex pier. J Hydraul Eng 139(5):482–491

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moreno M, Maia R, Couto L (2015) Effects of relative column width and pile-cap elevation on local scour depth around complex piers. J Hydraul Eng 142(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yang Y, Melville BW, Sheppard DM, Shamseldin AY (2018) Clear-water local scour at skewed complex bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 144(6):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gautam P, Edlho TI, Mazumder BS, Behera MR (2019) Experimental study of flow and turbulence characteristics around simple and complex pier using PIV. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 100(2019):193–206

    Google Scholar 

  47. Keshavarzi A, Shrestha C, Melville B, Khabbaz H, Ranjbar-Zahedani M, Ball J (2018) Estimation of maximum scour depths at upstream of front and rear piers for two in-line circular columns. Environ Fluid Mech 18:537–550

    Google Scholar 

  48. Roulund A (2000) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of flow around a bottom-mounted pile and its application to scour. Department of Hydrodynamics and Water Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

  49. Roulund A, Sumer BM, Fredsoe J, Michelsen J (2005) Numerical and experimental investigation of flow and scour around a circular pile. J Fluid Mech 534:351–401

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sturm TW (2006) Scour around Bankline and Setback Abutments in compound channels. J Hydraul Eng 132(1):21–32

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hong S, Abid I (2019) Scour around an erodible abutment with riprap apron over time. J Hydraul Eng 145(6):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sturm TW, Sotiropoulos F, Landers MN, Gotvald T, Lee S, Ge L, Navarro R, Escauriaza C (2004) Laboratory and 3D numerical modeling with field monitoring of regional bridge scour in Georgia. 2002, Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, GA

  53. Lee SO, Hong SH (2018) Reproducing field measurements using scaled-down hydraulic model studies in a laboratory. Adv Civ Eng 2018:9091506

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jones JS, Kilgore RT, Mistichelli MP (1992) Effects of footing location on bridge pier scour. J Hydraul Eng 118(2):280–290

    Google Scholar 

  55. Melville BW, Raudkivi AJ (1996) Effects of foundation geometry on bridge pier scour. J Hydraul Eng 122(4):203–209

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pizarro A, Ettmer B, Manfreda S, Rojas A, Link O (2017) Dimensionless effective flow work for estimation of pier scour caused by flood waves. J Hydraul Eng 143(7):635–642

    Google Scholar 

  57. Choo H, Zhao Q, Burns S, Sturm T, Hong S (2020) Laboratory and theoretical evaluation of impact of packing density, particle shape, and uniformity coefficient on erodibility of coarse-grained soil particles. Earth Surf Profess Landf 45(7):1499–1509

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dargahi B (1989) Turbulent flow field around a circular cylinder. Exp Fluids 8(1–2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  59. Muzzammil M, Gangadhariah T (2003) Caracteristiques moyennes d’un vortex en fer a cheval au droit d’une pile cylindrique(The mean characteristics of horsehoe vortex at a cylindrical pier). J Hydraul Res 41(3):285–297

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lee SO (2006) Physical modeling of local scour around complex bridge piers. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA

  61. Link O, Henriquez S, Ettmer B (2019) Physical scale modelling of scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Res 57(2):227–237

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2017R1A2B2011990). Also, this study was supported by GDOT and an internal grant from West Virginia University. We also would like to express our sincere appreciation to Terry W. Sturm, our mentor in Georgia Institute of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Ho Hong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.O., Abid, I. & Hong, S.H. Effect of complex shape of pier foundation exposure on time development of scour. Environ Fluid Mech 21, 103–127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09765-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-020-09765-3

Keywords

Navigation