Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stratified flow interactions with a suspended canopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field observations of the interactions between a stratified flow and a canopy suspended from the free surface above a solid boundary are described and analysed. Data were recorded in and around the canopy formed by a large long-line mussel farm. The canopy causes a partial blockage of the water flow, reducing velocities in the upper water column. Deceleration of the approaching flow results in a deepening of isopycnals upstream of the canopy. Energy considerations show that the potential for an approaching stratified flow to be diverted beneath a porous canopy is indicated by a densimetric Froude number. Strong stratification or low-velocities inhibit vertical diversion beneath the canopy, instead favouring a horizontal diversion around the sides. The effect on vertical mixing is also considered with a shear layer generated beneath the canopy and turbulence generated from drag within the canopy. In the observations, stratification is shown to be of sufficient strength to limit the effectiveness of the first mixing process, while the turbulence within the canopy is likely to enhance vertical exchange. Velocity and temperature microstructure measurements are used to investigate the effect of the canopy on turbulent dissipation and show that dissipation is enhanced within the canopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaldec R (1990) Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation Resistance. J Hydraulic Eng 116:691–707

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson GA, Winant CD (1983) Effect of a kelp forest on coastal currents. Continental Shelf Res 2:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghisalberti M, Nepf HM (2002) Mixing layers and coherent structures in vegetated aquatic flows. J Geophys Res 107(C2):3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing layer analogy. Bound Lay Meteorol 78:351–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Finnigan JJ (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lightbody AF, Nepf HM (2006) Prediction of velocity profiles and longitudinal dispersion in emergent salt marsh vegetation. Limnol Oceanogr 51(1):218–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nepf HM (1999) Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 35(2):479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grant J, Bacher C (2001) A numerical model of flow modification induced by suspended aquaculture in a Chinese bay. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1003–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blanco J, Zapata M, Moroño Á (1996) Some aspects of the water flow through mussel rafts. Sci Mar 60(2–3):275–282

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plew DR, Stevens CL, Spigel RH, Hartstein ND (2005) Hydrodynamic implications of large offshore mussel farms. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 30(1):95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson GA (1998) Currents in the high drag environment of a coastal kelp stand off California. Cont Shelf Res 17(15):1913–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Waite RP (1989) The nutritional biology of Perna canaliculus with special reference to intensive mariculture systems. Thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury

  14. Gibbs MM, James MR, Pickmere SE, Woods PH, Shakespeare BS, Hickman RW, Illingworth J (1991) Hydrodynamic and water column properties at six stations associated with mussel farming in Pelorus Sound, 1984–1985. NZ J Mar Freshw Res 25:239–254

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd AJ, Heasman KG (1998) Shellfish mariculture in the Benguela system: water flow patterns within a mussel farm in Saldanha Bay, South Africa. J Shellfish Res 17(1):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baines PG (1995) Topograhic effects in stratified flows. Cambridge monographs on mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hawkins AJS, James MR, Hickman RW, Hatton S, Weatherhead M (1999) Modelling of suspension-feeding and growth in the green-lipped mussel Perna canaliculus exposed to natural and experimental variations of seston availability in the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 191:217–232

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pilditch CA, Grant J, Bryan KR (2001) Seston supply to scallops in suspended culture. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58(2):241–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brunet Y, Irvine MR (2000) The control of coherent eddies in vegetation canopies: streamwise structure spacing, canopy shear scale and atmospheric stability. Bound-Lay Meteorol 94(1):139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kruijt B, Malhi Y, Lloyd J, Norbre AD, Miranda AC, Pereira MGP, Culf A, Grace J (2000) Turbulence statistics above and within two Amazon rain forest canopies. Bound-Lay Meteorol 94(2):297–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt JCR, Snyder WH (1980) Experiments on stably and neutrally stratified flow over a model three-dimensional hill. J Fluid Mech 96:671–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baines PG (1987) Upstream blocking and airflow over mountains. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 19:75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baines PG (1988) A general method for determining upstream effects in stratified flow of finite depth over long two-dimensional obstacles. J Fluid Mech 188:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheppard PA (1956) Airflow over mountains. Q J R Meteorol Soc 82:528–529

    Google Scholar 

  25. Snyder WH, Thompson RS, Eskridge RE, Lawson RE, Castro IP, Lee JT, Hunt JCR, Ogawa Y (1986) The structure of strongly stratified flow over hills: dividing streamline concept. J Fluid Mech 152:249–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baines PG (1979) Observations of stratified flow past three-dimensional barriers. J Geophys Res 83:7834–7838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baines PG (1979) Observations of stratified flow over two-dimensional obstacles in fluid of finite depth. Tellus 31:351–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baines PG, Hoinka KP (1985) Stratified flow over two-dimensional topography in fluid of infinite depth: a laboratory simulation. J Atmos Sci 42:1614–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bell RC, Thompson RORY (1980) Valley ventilation by cross-winds. J Fluid Mech 96:757–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miles JW (1961) On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J Fluid Mech 10:496–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bryan KR, Black KP, Gorman RM (2003) Spectral estimates of dissipation rate within and near the surf zone. J Phys Oceanogr 33:979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Voulgaris G, Trowbridge JH (1998) Evaluation of the Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter (ADV) for turbulence measurements. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 15:272–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruddick B, Anis A, Thompson K (2000) Maximum likelihood spectral fitting, the Batchelor spectrum. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 17:1541–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stevens CL, Fisher TSR, Lawrence GA (2005) Turbulent layering beneath the pycnocline in a strongly stratified pit lake. Limnol Oceanogr 50(1):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kocsis O, Prandke H, Stips A, Simon A, Wüest A (1999) Comparison of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy determined from shear and temperature microstructure. J Mar Sys 21:67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ho C-M, Huerre P (1984) Perturbed free shear layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 16:365–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Plew DR (2005) The hydrodynamic effects of long-line mussel farms. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury

  38. Rehmann CR, Koseff JR (2004) Mean potential energy change in stratified grid turbulence. Dyn Atmos Oceans 37:271–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosman JH, Koseff JR, Monismith SG (2006) A field investigation into the effects of a kelp forest (Macrocystis pyrifera) on coastal hydrodynamics and transport. J Geophysl Res (in press)

  40. Hatcher A, Grant J, Schofield B (1994) Effects of suspended mussel culture (Mytilus spp.) on sedimentation, benthic respiration and sediment nutrient dynamics in a Coastal Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 115:219–235

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hartstein ND (2005) Acoustical and sedimentological characterization of substrates in and around sheltered and open-ocean mussel aquaculture sites and its bearing on the dispersal of mussel debris. J Oceanic Eng 30(1):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hartstein ND, Stevens CL (2005) Deposition beneath long-line mussel farms. Aquacult Eng 33:192–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dahlback N, Gunnarsson LH (1981) Sedimentation and sulphate reduction under a mussel culture. Mar Biol 63:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mattsson J, Linden O (1983) Benthic macrofauna succession under mussels, Mytilus edulis L (Bivalvia), cultured on hanging long-line. Sarsia 68:97–102

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ogilvie SC (2000) Phytoplankton depletion in cultures of the mussel Perna canaliculus. Thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury

  46. Helsley CE, Kim JW (2005) Mixing downstream of a submerged fish cage: a numerical study. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 30(1):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Hydrodynamics group, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand

    David R. Plew & Robert H. Spigel

  2. National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) Marine Physics group, Private Bag 14-901, Kilbirnie, Wellington, New Zealand

    Craig L. Stevens

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Roger I. Nokes & Mark J. Davidson

Authors
  1. David R. Plew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert H. Spigel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Craig L. Stevens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roger I. Nokes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark J. Davidson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Plew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plew, D.R., Spigel, R.H., Stevens, C.L. et al. Stratified flow interactions with a suspended canopy. Environ Fluid Mech 6, 519–539 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-006-9008-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-006-9008-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation