Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multivariate Bayesian analysis of atmosphere–ocean general circulation models

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical experiments based on atmosphere–ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) are one of the primary tools in deriving projections for future climate change. Although each AOGCM has the same underlying partial differential equations modeling large scale effects, they have different small scale parameterizations and different discretizations to solve the equations, resulting in different climate projections. This motivates climate projections synthesized from results of several AOGCMs’ output. We combine present day observations, present day and future climate projections in a single highdimensional hierarchical Bayes model. The challenging aspect is the modeling of the spatial processes on the sphere, the number of parameters and the amount of data involved. We pursue a Bayesian hierarchical model that separates the spatial response into a large scale climate change signal and an isotropic process representing small scale variability among AOGCMs. Samples from the posterior distributions are obtained with computer-intensive MCMC simulations. The novelty of our approach is that we use gridded, high resolution data covering the entire sphere within a spatial hierarchical framework. The primary data source is provided by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) and consists of 9 AOGCMs on a 2.8 by 2.8 degree grid under several different emission scenarios. In this article we consider mean seasonal surface temperature and precipitation as climate variables. Extensions to our model are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen MR, Stott PA, Mitchell JFB, Schnur R and Delworth TL (2000). Quantifying the uncertainty in forecasts of anthropogenic climate change. Nature 407: 617–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Gelfrand AE, Carlin BP (2004) Hierarchical modeling and analysis for spatial data. Chapman & Hall/CRC

  • Berliner LM, Wikle L and Cressie N (2000). Long-lead prediction of Pacific SST via Bayesian dynamic modelling. J Clim 13: 3953–3968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM and Smith AFM (1994). Bayesian theory. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Covey C, AchutaRao KM, Lambert SJ, Taylor KE (2000) Intercomparison of present and future climates simulated by coupled ocean-atmosphere GCMs. PCMDI Report No. 66, UCRL-ID-140325, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA

  • Cressie NAC (1993). Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (revised reprint)

  • Forest CE, Stone PH, Sokolov AP, Allen MR and Webster M (2002). Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295: 113–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frame DJ, Booth BBB, Kettleborough JA, Stainforth DA, Gregory JM, Collins M and Allen MR (2005). Constraining climate forecasts: the role of prior assumptions. J Geophys Res 32: L09702

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M and Raftery AE (2005). Model evaluation and spatial interpolation by bayesian combination of observations with outputs from numerical models. Biometrics 66: 36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspari G and Cohn SE (1999). Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 125: 723–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand A and Smith A (1990). Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 398–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geman S and Geman D (1984). Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 6: 721–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall

  • Gneiting T (1999). Correlation functions for atmospheric data analysis. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 125: 2449–2464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Stouffer RJ, Raper SCB, Stott PA and Rayner NA (2002). An observationally based estimate of the climate sensitivity. J Clim 15: 3117–3121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handcock MS and Wallis JR (1994). An approach to statistical spatial-temporal modeling of meteorological fields. J Am Stat Assoc 89: 368–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, Xiaosu D, Maskell K, Johnson CA and Linden PJ (2001). Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R and Gentleman R (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5: 299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RH (1963). Stochastic processes on a sphere. Ann Math Stat 34: 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woolen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetma A, Reynolds R, Jenne R and Joseph D (1996). The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Am Meteorol Soc Bull 77: 437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Stocker TF, Joos F and Plattner G-K (2002). Constraints on radiative forcing and future climate change from observations and climate model ensembles. Nature 416: 719–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Stocker TF, Joos F and Plattner G-K (2003). Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks. Clim Dyn 21: 257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matérn B (1986). Spatial variation, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Boer GJ, Covey C, Latif M and Stouffer RJ (2000). The coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP). Am Meteorol Soc Bull 81: 313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2004) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  • Robert CP, Casella G (1999) Monte carlo statistical methods. Springer

  • Schneider SH (2001). What is dangerous climate change?. Nature 411: 17–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenberg IJ (1942). Positive definite functions on spheres. Duke Math J 9: 96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi C, Smith RL, Nychka D and Mearns LO (2005). Quantifying uncertainty in projections of regional climate change: a Bayesian approach to the analysis of multimodel ensembles. J Clim 18: 1524–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber RO and Talkner P (1993). Some remarks on spatial correlation function models. Monthly Weather Rev 121: 2611–2137; Corrigendum: (1999) 127:576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigley TML and Raper SCB (2001). Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science 293: 451–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle C, Berliner L and Cressie N (1998). Hierarchical Bayesian space-time models. Environ Ecol Stat 5: 117–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle CK and Cressie N (1999). A dimension-reduced approach to space-time Kalman filtering. Biometrika 86: 815–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle CK, Milliff RF, Nychka D and Berliner LM (2001). Spatio-temporal hierarchical Bayesian modeling: Tropical ocean surface winds. J Am Stat Assoc 96: 382–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaglom AM (1987). Correlation theory of stationary and related random functions, vol. I. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Furrer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furrer, R., Sain, S.R., Nychka, D. et al. Multivariate Bayesian analysis of atmosphere–ocean general circulation models. Environ Ecol Stat 14, 249–266 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0018-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0018-z

Keywords

Navigation