Abstract
This paper proposes that the theoretical concept of cultural models can offer useful insights into parental involvement in their child’s mathematical achievement and the resources they use to go about gaining information in culturally diverse learning settings. This examination takes place within a cultural-developmental framework and draws on the notion of cultural models to explicate parental understandings of their child’s mathematics achievement and what resources are used to make sense of this. Three parental resources are scrutinized: (a) the teacher, (b) examination test results, and (c) constructions of child development. The interviews with 22 parents revealed some ambiguity around the interpretation of these resources by the parent, which was often the result of incongruent cultural models held between the home and the school. The resources mentioned are often perceived as being unambiguous but show themselves instead to be highly interpretive because of the diversity of cultural models in existence in culturally diverse settings. Parents who are in minority or marginalized positions tend to have difficulties in interpreting cultural models held by school, thereby disempowering them to be parentally involved in the way the school would like.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Dot-to-dot are drawings which are revealed by joining numerical points together.
References
Abreu, G. de. (1995). Understanding how children experience the relationship between home and school mathematics. Mind, Culture and Activity: An International Journal, 2(2), 119–142. doi:10.1080/10749039509524693.
Abreu, G. de. (2008). From mathematics learning out-of-school to multicultural classrooms: A cultural psychology perspective. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 352–383). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Abreu, G. de., & Cline, T. (2005). Parents’ representations of their children’s mathematics learning in multiethnic primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 31(6), 697–722. doi:10.1080/01411920500314869.
Abreu, G. de., & Cline, T. (2008). Schooled mathematics and cultural knowledge. In P. Murphy & R. McCormick (Eds.), Knowledge and practice: Representations and identities (pp. 189–204). Milton Keynes: The Open University.
Andrews, J., & Yee, W. C. (2006). Children’s’funds of knowledge’ and their real life activities: Two minority ethnic children learning in out-of-school contexts in the UK. Educational Review, 58(4), 435–449.
Bauchspies, W. (2005). Sharing shoes and counting years: Mathematics, colonization, and communication. In A. Chronaki & I. Christiansen (Eds.), Challenging perspectives on mathematical classroom communication (pp. 237–259). US: Information Age Publishing.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–10.
Bryans, T. (1989). Parental involvement in primary schools: Contemporary issues. In S. Wolfendale (Ed.), Parental involvement: Developing networks between school, home and community. UK: Cassell Educational Limited.
Burman, E. (2008). Deconstructing developmental psychology (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Civil, M., & Andrade, R. (2003). Collaborative practice with parents: The role of the researcher as a mediator. In A. Peter-Koop, V. Santos-Wagner, C. Breen, & A. Begg (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education (pp. 153–168). Boston: Kluwer.
Civil, M., Planas, N., & Quintos, B. (2005). Immigrant parents’ perspectives on their children’s mathematics education. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM), 37(2), 81–89.
Cole, M. (1998). Can cultural psychology help us to think about diversity? Mind, Culture and Activity, 5(4), 291–304. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0504_4.
Cooper, H. (1989). Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Readership, 47, 85–91.
Crafter, S. (2009). Parental resources for understanding mathematical achievement in multiethnic settings. In Abreu, Crafter & Gorgorió (Eds.), Proceedings from the 6th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, (pp. 14–22). Lyon, France. Available from: http://www.inrp.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/wg8.pdf#page=15.
Crozier, G. (2001). Excluded parents: The deracialisation of parental involvement. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 4(4), 329–341. doi:10.1080/13613320120096643.
Crozier, G., & Davies, J. (2007). Hard to reach parents or hard to reach schools? A discussion of home–school relations, with particular reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani parents. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 295–313. doi:10.1080/01411920701243578.
D’Andrade, R. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Cultural theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 88–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
D’Andrade, R. (1995). Some propositions about the relations between culture and human cognition. In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 65–129). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Edwards, A., & Warin, J. (1999). Parental involvement in raising the achievement of primary school pupils: Why bother? Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 325–342.
Farrow, S., Tymms, P., & Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 323–341.
Fleer, M. (2006). The cultural construction of child development: Creating institutional and cultural intersubjectivity. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(2), 127–140. doi:10.1080/09669760600661294.
Flick, U. (2000). Episodic interviewing. In Bauer & Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 75–92). UK: Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.
Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (1993). Activity settings of early literacy: Home and school factors in children’s emergent literacy. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 315–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (2001). Analysing cultural models and settings to connect minority achievement and school improvement research. Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 45–56. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3601_5.
Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2001). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.
Georgiou, S. N. (1996). Parental involvement: Definition and outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 1(3), 189–209. doi:10.1007/BF02339890.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Armanti, C. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gorgorió, N., & Abreu, G. de. (2009). Social representations as mediators of practice in mathematics classrooms with immigrant students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 61–76. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9183-3.
Gorgorió, N., & Planas, N. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 7–33. doi:10.1023/A:1017980828943.
Hanafin, J., & Lynch, A. (2002). Peripheral voices: Parental involvement, social class, and educational disadvantage. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 35–49. doi:1080/01425690120102845.
Harkness, S., Super, C. M., & Keefer, C. H. (1992). Learning to be an American parent: How cultural models gain directive force. In R. D’Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 163–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hedegaard, M. (2005). Strategies for dealing with conflicts in value positions between home and school: Influences on ethnic minority students’ development of motives and identity. Culture and Psychology, 11(2), 187–205. doi:10.1177/1354067X05052351.
Holland, D. (1997). How cultural systems become desire: A case study of American romance. In R. D’Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 61–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, M., & Pollard, A. (2006). Home–school knowledge exchange in context. Educational Review, 58(4), 385–39.
Jackson, K., & Remillard, J. T. (2005). Rethinking parent involvement: African American mothers construct their roles in the mathematics education of their children. School Community Journal, 15(1), 51.
Kim, Y. (2009). Minority parental involvement and school barriers: Moving the focus away from deficiencies of parents. Educational Research Review, 4(2), 80–102. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.20009.02.003.
Lange, T. & Meaney, T. (2011). Becoming disadvantaged: Public discourse around national testing. Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (9–13 February) Poland, Rzeszów.
Maclure, M., & Walker, B. M. (2000). Disenchanted evenings: The social organization of talk in parent-teacher consultations in UK secondary schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 5–25.
McMullen, R., & Abreu, G. de. (2011). Mothers’ experiences of their children’s school mathematics at home: The impact of being a mother-teacher. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 59–74.
O’Toole, S., & Abreu, G. de. (2005). Parents’ past experiences as resources for mediation in the child’s current mathematical learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(1), 75–89. doi:10.1007/BF03173212.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Civey Robinson, J. (2008). Parental involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039–1101. doi:10.3102/0034654308325185.
Pérez Campos, G. (2004). What are cultural models for? Child-rearing practices in historical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 10(3), 279. doi:10.1177/1354067X04042889.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: OUP.
Solomon, Y., Warin, J., & Lewis, C. (2002). Helping with homework? Homework as a site of tension for parents and teenagers. British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 603–622. doi:10.1080/0141192022000005850.
Strauss, C. (1992). What makes Tony run? Schemas as motives reconsidered. In R. D’Andrade & C. Strauss (Eds.), Human motives and cultural models (pp. 197–224). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B., Baker, D., & Tomlin, A. (2005). Navigating numeracies: Home/school numeracy practices. UK: Springer.
Williams, P. (2008). Independent review of mathematics teaching in early years settings and primary schools. Department for Children, Schools and Families, UK.
Zittoun, T. (2004). Symbolic competencies for developmental transitions: The case of the choice of first names. Culture & Psychology, 10(2), 131–161. doi:10.1177/1354067X04040926.
Zittoun, T. (2006). Transitions: Development through symbolic resources. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Sarah Crafter is also a member of the EMiCS group Educació Matemàtica i Context Sociocultural -Mathematics Education and Sociocultural Context-, a research granted by the Direcció General de Recerca -General Directorate of Research- of the Catalan Government (ref: SGR2009 00590). She participates in two of the research projects of the group EMiCS, EDU2010-15373 funded by the Dirección General de Investigación -General Directorate of Research- of the Spanish Government and RecerCaixa 2010-2 funded by ACUP and Fundació LaCaixa, a private foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crafter, S. Parental cultural models and resources for understanding mathematical achievement in culturally diverse school settings. Educ Stud Math 81, 31–46 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9359-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9359-5