Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Distributional Argument for Supply-Side Climate Policies

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a distributional argument for the use of supply-side climate policies whereby carbon emissions are controlled through (i) depletion quotas or (ii) permanent confiscation of a fraction of the in situ carbon stocks. The modeling considers intertemporal competitive equilibria in the Cobb-Douglas version of the Dasgupta-Heal-Solow-Stiglitz model of capital accumulation and costless resource extraction. It is shown how policies (i) and (ii) preserve the functional distribution of income between capital owners and resource owners, compared to the case where no climate policy is needed, while suggested demand-side policies do not. Such observations are of interest as avoiding functional redistribution may facilitate climate change negotiations. The paper discusses policy implications of the analysis outside the simplified setting of the stylized model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldy JE, Krupnick AJ, Newell RG, Parry IWH, Pizer WA (2010) Climate mitigation policy. J Econ Lit 48: 903–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen MR, Frame DJ, Huntingford C, Jones CD, Lowe JA, Meinshausen M, Meinshausen N (2009) Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458: 1163–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Dasgupta PS, Mäler K-G (2003) Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environ Resour Econ 26: 647–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim GB, Buchholz W, Hartwick JM, Mitra T, Withagen C (2007) Constant savings rates and quasi-arithmetic population growth under exhaustible resource constraints. J Environ Econ Manag 53: 213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim GB, Hartwick JM (2011) Anomalies in green national accounting. Ecol Econ 70: 2303–2307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim GB, Wei T (2009) Sectoral income. Environ Resour Econ 42: 65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm P (1993) Incomplete international cooperation to reduce CO2 emissions: alternative policies. J Environ Econ Manag 24: 258–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1972) Durability and monopoly. J Law Econ 15: 143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta PS, Heal GM (1974) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta PS, Heal GM (1979) Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenack K, Edenhofer O, Kalkuhl M (2012) Energy taxes, resource taxes and quantity rationing for climate protection. Energy Policy (forthcoming). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.001

  • Gerlagh R (2011) Too much oil. CESifo Econ Stud 57: 79–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harstad B (2012a) Buy coal! A case for supply-side environmental policy. J Political Econ 120: 77–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harstad B (2012b) The market for conservation and other hostages. Working Paper no. 17409, NBER, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel M (1994) Efficient climate policy in the presence of free riders. J Environ Econ Manag 27: 259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel M (2012) Carbon taxes and the green paradox. In: Hahn RW, Ulph A (eds) Climate change and commonsense: essays in honour of Tom Schelling. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Liski M, Tahvonen O (2004) Can carbon tax eat OPECs rents. J Environ Econ Manag 47: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méjean A, Hope C (2010) The effect of CO2 pricing on conventional and non-conventional oil supply and demand. Cambridge working paper in Economics 1054

  • Persson TA, Azar C, Johansson D, Lindgren K (2007) Major oil exporters may profit rather than lose, in a carbon-constrained world. Energy Policy 35: 6346–6353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal E (2010) Nations that debate coal use export it to feed China’s need. New York Times, 21 Nov 2010. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/22/science/earth/22fossil.html

  • Sefton J, Weale M (2006) The concept of income in a general equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 73: 219–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn HW (2008) Public policies against global warming. Int Tax Public Financ 15: 360–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1974) Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev Econ Stud 41:29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (1974) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev Econ Stud 41:123–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell O (2008) Kyoto2: how to manage the global greenhouse. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg F, Withagen C (2011) Is there really a green paradox? J Environ Econ Manag (forthcoming)

  • Weitzman ML (1976) On the welfare significance of national product in a dynamic economy. Q J Econ 90: 156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1095, Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway

    Geir B. Asheim

Authors
  1. Geir B. Asheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geir B. Asheim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asheim, G.B. A Distributional Argument for Supply-Side Climate Policies. Environ Resource Econ 56, 239–254 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9590-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9590-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation