Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Through three levels of abstraction: Towards an ecological framework for making sense of new technologies in education

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This position paper uses an ecological approach to examine how the interface between digital technology and education might be taken up as a complex system with interconnected facets that hold a range of implications. We understand the concept of ecology as the science of relations between living and non-living organisms and the environment, and we apply this model to identify the interactions between entities that exist in the hybrid space that intersects human social systems and technical systems. We use themes such as knowledge ecology and law of entropy to analyse how ecology is being discussed in extant literature and as a conceptual guide for thinking about how to develop an ecological framework for critical analysis of digital education. These two examples of are taken from conceptions of “complexity” and are key when illustrating contemporary developments in digital education. We propose ten categories derived from three groups of abstraction as a tool for research on educational, technical, and social impacts of 5G technology—or the relationship between 5G and education as a complex system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Communication materiality is a structure that questions the conditions, places, support and modalities of sense production. The sense production suggests that the sense, significance and ideas of communication are what matters- therefore not the precise words written or spoken. Instead it is the interpretation of the written or spoken terms that are important.

  2. In this paper, when we discuss Ecology as a science or field to be studied, we use the first capitalized form. To discuss in a more general way, we use lower case first form. The same for Education, Complexity and Metaphors.

  3. The Platform is coordinated by one of the authors of this paper.

References

  • 3GPP. (2018). Telecommunication management; Self-configuration of network elements; Concepts and requirements. [S.l.].

  • Anderson, B., & Johnson, S. D. (2006). The effects of floral mimics and models on each others’ fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 273(1589), 969–974. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanowicz, Z. R. (2017). Flying Swarm of Drones Over Circulant Digraph. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 53(6), 2662–2670. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2709858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R. (2015). The Deep Ecology/Ecofeminism Debate: An Enquiry into Environmental Ethics. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 32, 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Felice, M. (2017). Net-Ativismo. Editora Paulus: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communication Action, Heinemen Educ. – Germany.

  • Han, B., et al. (2015). Network Function Virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(2), 90–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1959). The Question Concerning Technology (Die Frage nach der Technik), Garland Science.

  • International Symposium for 5G and Network Interaction Ecology. (2019). In.: Dipartamento di Ricerca Sociale a la Universitá La Sapienza di Roma. Available at: https://www.coris.uniroma1.it/archivionotizie/total-connections-how-social-morphology-changes-age-5g

  • Latour, B. (1994). Jamais Fomos Modernos, Editora 34, São Paulo.

  • Latour, B. (2001). Pandora’s Hope. Oxford: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. Cambridge: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leśniewski. (1930). Comptes rendus des séances de la Société des Sciences et des Lettres de Varsovie, Classe III, pp. 111–132.

  • López, L. B. et al. (2017). Key technologies in the Context of future networks: operational and management requirements. Future Internet, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2017.

  • Marcuse, H. (1964) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society Routledge.

  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2015). Introdução ao Pensamento Complexo. São Paulo: Editora 34.

  • Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 16(1-4):95–100.

  • Potter, J., McDougall, J. (2017). Digital media, culture and education: Theorising third space literacies. Springer, p. 205.

  • Pereira, K. F. (2011). Towards Computer Ontology, Computational Science Review.

  • Polanin, J. R., Maynard, B. R., & Dell, N. A. (2017). Overviews in Education Research: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santaella, L. (2008). Espaços Intersticiais. PUC: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J. C., & Yanaze, L. K. H. (2012). Redes digitais e sustentabilidade: as interações com o meio ambiente na era da informação. São Paulo: Annablume.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2010). Educação Infantil no Brasil. Brasília: UNESCO Regional Office Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000214418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press USA-OSO.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Bonami and Nemorin would like to thank the Knowledge Lab at the Institute of Education at University College London for hosting the research. Bonami would, also, like to thank the University of São Paulo (USP - Brazil) and the Coordenação para Aperfeiçoamento da Pesquisa no Ensino Superior (CAPES - Brazil) for providing her full scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Beatrice Bonami

  2. University College London, London, UK

    Beatrice Bonami & Selena Nemorin

Authors
  1. Beatrice Bonami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Selena Nemorin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors worked directly on the paper. Author Bonami conducted the research, analysis, wrote and revised the text. Author Nemorin conducted the theoretical research, wrote and revised the text. All authors had approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beatrice Bonami.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bonami, B., Nemorin, S. Through three levels of abstraction: Towards an ecological framework for making sense of new technologies in education. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1183–1200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10305-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10305-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation