Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A survey of educational games as interaction design tools for affective learning: Thematic analysis taxonomy

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Computer game is the new platform in generating learning experiences for educational purposes. There are many educational games that have been used as an interaction design tool in a learning environment to enhance students learning outcomes. However, research also claims that playing video games can have a negative impact on student behavior, cognition and emotion. The aim of the study is to review the related articles in educational games and the function of games as interaction design tools, which affect student’s cognition, emotion and social skills interaction when playing games. We use thematic analysis to classify the papers including the following: (a) data familiarization (b) initial code generation (c) review themes (d) themes search (e) Define & Name Themes. The articles were found from four databases: web of science, IEEE, ACM, and Springer. All the articles were analyzed based on three main research questions (1) what are the issues of survey papers in educational games? (2) What are the trends of research models in educational game? (3) What is the technology used in educational games? The results show that educational games are affective interaction design tools for learning outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amory, A. (2007). Game object model version II: A theoretical framework for educational game development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 51–77. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9001-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A. (2004). An update on the effects of playing violent video games. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 113–122. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. F., McLoughlin, L., Liarokapis, F., Peters, C., Petridis, P., & de Freitas, S. (2010). Developing serious games for cultural heritage: A state-of-the-art review. Virtual Reality, 14, 255–275. doi:10.1007/s10055-010-0177-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, A., Lepouras, G., Bampatzia, S., & Almpanoudi, H. (2013). An approach for serious game development for cultural heritage: Case study for an archaeological site and museum. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 6, 17.1–17.19. doi:10.1145/2532630.2532633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahreini, K., Nadolski, R., & Westera, W. (2012). FILTWAM - a framework for online affective computing in serious games. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 45–52. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa A.F.S., Pereira P.N.M., Dias J.A.F.F,, & Silva F.G.M., (2014). A New Methodology of Design and Development of Serious Games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. doi:10.1155/2014/817167.

  • Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., D’ursi, A., & Fiore, V. (2012). A serious game model for cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 5, 1–27. doi:10.1145/2399180.2399185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, E. A., Macarthur, E. W., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., Manea, M., Kärki, A., & Van Rosmalen, P. (2014). A narrative literature review of games, animations and simulations to teach research methods and statistics. Computers and Education, 74, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroux, L., Isbister, K., Le Bigot, L., & Vibert, N. (2015). Computers in Human Behavior Player–video game interaction: A systematic review of current concepts. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 366–381. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.066.

  • Catalano, C. E., Luccini, A. M., & Mortara, M. (2014). Guidelines for an effective design of serious games. International Journal of Serious Games, 1, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. (2010). Constructionist learning through serious games. IE 10 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: 1–3.

  • Clarke, S., Arnab, S., Dunwell, I., & Brown, K. (2012). PR:EPARe: A game-based approach to relationship guidance for adolescents. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 38–44. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, T., Mostmans, L., & Naessens, K. (2013). MuseUs: Case study of a pervasive cultural heritage serious game. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 6, 1–19. doi:10.1145/2460376.2460379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers and Education, 59, 661–686. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004 Elsevier Ltd.

  • Derbali, L., & Frasson, C. (2012). Assessment of learners’ motivation during interactions with serious games: A study of some motivational strategies in food-force. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/624538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Educational video game design : A review of the Literature, 4, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann, C., & Biddle, R. (2008). Understanding game design for affective learning. Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play 41–48. doi:10.1145/1496984.1496992.

  • Fogg, B. J. (2003). Computers as persuasive social actors (pp. 89–120). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. doi:10.1145/764008.763957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, D., Sara, K. K., Ney, M., Ott, M., Popescu, M., Romero, M., & Stanescu, I. (2012). GEL: Exploring game enhanced learning. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 289–292. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M., La Guardia, D., Dal Grande, V., Ottaviano, S., Allegra, M., & La, V.U. (2014). An agent based approach to designing serious game: The PNPV case study Institute for Educational Technology - National Research Council of Italy. International Journal of Serious Games, 1.

  • George, S., & Serna, A. (2011). Introducing mobility in serious games: Enhancing situated and collaborative learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 6764. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12–20. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21619-0_2.

  • Hendrix, M., Dunwell, I., Lameras, P., Arnab, S., Petridis, P., Stewart, C., De Freitas, S., Backlund, P., & Liarokapis, F. (2013). Serious games and E-learning-learning standards: Towards an integrated experience. Journal of Advanced Distributed Learning Technology, 1, 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-H., & Huang, Y.-T. (2013). An annales school-based serious game creation framework for Taiwanese indigenous cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage. doi:10.1145/2460376.2460380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karouzaki, E., & Savidis, A. (2012). A framework for adaptive game presenters with emotions and social comments. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. doi:10.1155/2012/929814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebritchi, M., & Hirumi, A. (2008). Examining the pedagogical foundations of modern educational computer games. Computers and Education, 51, 1729–1743. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiili, K., Ketamo, H., & Kickmeier-rust, M. D. (2014). Eye tracking in game-based learning research and game design., 1.

  • Landers, R. N., Callan, R. C., De Freitas, S., & Liarokapis, F. (2011). Serious games and edutainment applications. Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, 9–23. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9.

  • Lanyi, C. S., Brown, D., Standen, P., Lewis, J., Butkute, V., & C. (2012). Results of user Interface evaluation of serious games for students with intellectual disability. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9, 225–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, M., & Örtqvist, D. (2010). Immersion and gameplay experience: A contingency framework. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. doi:10.1155/2010/613931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkilä, T., Hakonen, H., Smed, J., & Best, A. (2009). Three approaches towards teaching game production. Design and Use of Serious Games, 3–18. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9496-5_1.

  • Marzo, A., & Ardaiz, O. (2012). Learning with your Friend’s data: Game entity social mapping in serious games. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 299–300. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. (2012). Proceedings of the 2012 winter simulation conference. In C. Laroque, J. Himmelspach, R. Pasupathy, O. Rose, and A.M. Uhrmacher, (eds). Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference: 0–1. doi:10.1109/WSC.2012.6465271.

  • Meyer, B., & Sørensen, B. H. (2009). Designing serious games for computer assisted language learning – A framework for development and analysis. In Design and use of serious games (pp. 69–82). Intelligent Systems, Control, and Automation: Science and Engineering. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9496-5_5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, Z. (2011). Virtual reality: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortara, M., Catalano, C. E., Bellotti, F., Fiucci, G., Houry-Panchetti, M., & Petridis, P. (2014). Learning cultural heritage by serious games. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15, 318–325. doi:10.1016/j.Culher.2013.04.004 Elsevier Masson SAS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obikwelu, C., & Read, J. C. (2012). The serious game constructivist framework for children’s learning. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 32–37. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obikwelu, C., Read, J., Sim, G., & Lancashire, C. (2013). Children’s problem solving in serious games: The fine tuning system ( FTS ) elaborated. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 11.1(11), 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onventions, C., & Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.

  • Paolis, L.T.De, Giovanni, A.M.G., Luigi, O., & Pietro, V. (2011). Otranto in the Middle Ages: A Serious Game for the Edutainment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1, 47–57.

  • Pereira, G., Brisson, A., Prada, R., Paiva, A., Bellotti, F., Kravcik, M., & Klamma, R. (2012). Serious games for personal and Social Learning & Ethics: Status and trends. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 53–65. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2002). Design. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Proctor, M. D., & Marks, Y. (2013). A survey of exemplar teachers’ perceptions, use, and access of computer-based games and technology for classroom instruction. Computers and Education, 62, 171–180. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. In Computers and Education, 50, 559–578. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryokai, K., Farzin, F., Kaltman, E., & Niemeyer, G. (2013). Assessing multiple object tracking in young children using a game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 153–170. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9278-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2002). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Chicester, Wiley.

  • Starner, T., Leibe, B., Singletary, B., Lyons, K., Gandy, M., & Pair, J. (2000). Towards Augmented Reality Gaming. Proceedings of IMAGINA 2000 Conference. Monaco: 31 January-2 February 2000.

  • Sorden, S. D. (2005). A cognitive approach to instructional design for multimedia learning. Informing Science Journal, 8, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttie, N., Louchart, S., Lim, T., Macvean, A., Westera, W., Djaouti, D., & Brown, D. (2012). In persuit of a “serious games mechanics”: A theoretical framework to analyse relationships between “game” and “pedagogical aspects” of serious games. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 314–315. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsekleves, E., Cosmas, J., & Aggoun, A. (2016). Benefits, barriers and guideline recommendations for the implementation of serious games in education for stakeholders and policymakers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 164–183. doi:10.1111/bjet.12223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, J. A., García-Mundo, L., Genero, M., & Piattini, M. (2014). A systematic mapping study on serious game quality. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. EASE, 2014, 1–10. doi:10.1145/2601248.2601261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, T., & Li, Y. (2010). Design of Educational Game: A literature review. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6250, 266–276. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14484-4_22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westera, W., Nadolski, R. J., Hummel, H. G. K., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2008). Serious games for higher education: A framework for reducing design complexity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 420–432. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00279.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2010). Game design: The mapping of cognitive task analysis and game discourse analysis in creating effective and entertaining serious games. Proceedings of ECCE 2010 Conference, 25–27. August 2010, Delft, The Netherlands.

  • Wouters, P., van der Spek, E. D., & van Oostendorp, H. (2011). Measuring learning in serious games: A case study with structural assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 741–763. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9183-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., & Wang, A. I. (2012). Comparison of learning software architecture by developing social applications versus games on the android platform. International Journal of Computer Games Technology. doi:10.1155/2012/494232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. B., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., Simeoni, Z., Tran, M., & Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is in another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82, 61–89. doi:10.3102/0034654312436980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, Z., Sunar, M., & Shahrizal. (2014). Augmented reality: A survey in educational environment. International Journal of Interactive Digital Media, 2, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, Zarwina, Halina Mohamed Dahlan, and Norris Syed Abdullah. 2015. Advanced computer and communication Engineering technology: Proceedings of the 1st International conference on communication and computer Engineering. In, ed. Asyrani Hamzah Sulaiman, Azlishah Mohd Othman, Iskandar Mohd Fairuz Othman, Abd Yahaya Rahim, and Che Naim pee, 573–584. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07674-4_54.

  • Zain, N. H. M., Jaafar, A., & Razak, F. H. A.. (2012). SGameFlow framework: How to experience enjoyment in serious game (SG) for motor impaired users (MIU). 2012 International Conference on Computer and Information Science, ICCIS 2012 - A Conference of World Engineering, Science and Technology Congress, ESTCON 2012 - Conference Proceedings 2: 1020–1024. doi:10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297175.

  • Zarzuela, M. M., Díaz Pernas, F. J., Martínez, L. B., Ortega, D. G., & Rodríguez, M. A. (2013). mobile Serious game using augmented reality for supporting children’s learning about animals. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 375–381. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.046 Elsevier Masson SAS.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank University of Malaya Research Grant (UMRG) for sponsoring this project under (RP006A-14HNE), Usability of Serious Game Application for History Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahaboddin Shamshirband.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest and there are no other ethical standards that are involved in the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yusoff, Z., Kamsin, A., Shamshirband, S. et al. A survey of educational games as interaction design tools for affective learning: Thematic analysis taxonomy. Educ Inf Technol 23, 393–418 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9610-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9610-5

Keywords

Navigation