Skip to main content
Log in

Content and language integrated learning in OpenSimulator project. Results of a pilot implementation in Greece

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study presents the results of a pilot implementation of the Content and Language Integrated Learning in OpenSimulator Project-CLILiOP. Content and Language Integrated Learning together with constructivism provided the theoretical basis of the project. A multi-user virtual environment was developed using Opensimulator, which entailed a tour of the students’ avatars on a virtual island where they viewed and exchanged information in the English language regarding geographical terms and concepts. The project’s duration was ten weeks. A total of 105 students participated, divided into three groups: one used the application, the second was taught the same cognitive material using a conventional teaching method, but still under the scope of CLIL, while the third was conventionally taught. Results indicate that the learning outcomes of CLILiOP were better compared to the other two teaching methods, but also underline the need to further investigate the uses of 3D multi-user virtual environments in second language learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in english 1. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75–93. doi:10.1080/13803610500392160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, E., Grisaleña, J., & Campo, A. (2008). Plurilingual education in secondary schools: Analysis of results. In Depth, 1, 4.

  • Apple, M., & Kikuchi, K. (2007). Practical PowerPoint group projects for the EFL classroom. The JALT CALL Journal, 3(3), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E., Hobbs, M., & Gordon, M. (2010). A virtual world environment for group work. Novel Developments in Web-Based Learning Technologies: Tools for Modern Teaching: Tools for Modern Teaching, 233.

  • Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. New York: WW Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, D. (2008). Using Immersive Learning Environments in Foreign Language Classes: Second Life. CALICO Journal, 26(1).

  • Cenoz, J., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2015). Learning through a second or additional language: Content-based instruction and CLIL in the twenty-first century. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J. (2008). Developing a Meaning-focused and Task-based Virtual Learning Reality. CALICO Journal, 26(1).

  • Chandra, S., Theng, Y. L., & Shou-Boon, S. F. (2009). Proposed theoretical framework for virtual world adoption. SLACTIONS, 2009, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coban, M., Karakus, T., Karaman, A., Gunay, F., & Goktas, Y. (2015). Technical problems experienced in the transformation of virtual worlds into an education environment and coping strategies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke-Plagwitz, J. (2008). Conversing in the Metaverse: Language Teaching and Learning in Second Life. CALICO Journal, 26(1).

  • Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: a step-by-step approach. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118165881.

  • Council of Europe (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe.

  • Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL-A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1200–1214). Springer US. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_92.

  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zarobe, Y. R. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque country. In Depth, 3(4), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, M. D. (2005). Brave new (interactive) worlds: A review of the design affordances and constraints of two 3D virtual worlds as interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 13(1–2), 121–137. doi:10.1080/10494820500173714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A., Pérez, M., & Johnstone, R. (2010). Bilingual Education Project (Spain): Evaluation Report.

  • Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S., & Klavas, A. (2002). What we know about how people learn. California Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43–71. doi:10.1002/piq.21143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felix, U. (2005). Analysing recent CALL effectiveness research: Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237–288. doi:10.3102/00346543042003237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., Huang, H., Grant, S., & Henderson, L. (2009). Language acquisition in second life: Improving self-efficacy beliefs. In R. J. Atkinson, & C. McBeath (Eds.), Same places, different spaces. Proceedings ascilite Auckland 2009 (pp. 464–474). Auckland: ascilite.

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three‐dimensional (3‐D) immersive virtual worlds in K‐12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 33–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jauregi, K., Canto, S., de Graaff, R., Koenraad, T., & Moonen, M. (2011). Verbal interaction in second life: Towards a pedagogic framework for task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(1), 77–101. doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.538699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., & Sharp, V. (2005). Is PowerPoint crippling our students? Learning & Leading with Technology, 33(3), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junglas, I. A., Johnson, N. A., Steel, D. J., Abraham, D. C., & Loughlin, P. M. (2007). Identity formation, learning styles and trust in virtual worlds. ACM SIGMIS Database, 38(4), 90–96. doi:10.1145/1314234.1314251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkley, S. E., & Kirkley, J. R. (2005). Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games and simulations. TechTrends, 49(3), 42–53. doi:10.1007/BF02763646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klieme, E., Eichler, W., Helmke, A., Lehmann, R. H., Nold, G., Rolff, H. G., … & Willenberg, H. (2006). Unterricht und kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch. Zentrale Befunde der Studie Deutsch-Englisch-Schülerleistungen-International (DESI) [Education and skills in German and English. Key findings of the study German English Student Services International]. Eine Studie im Auftrag der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.

  • Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1(1), 30–41. doi:10.2174/1874913500801010030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990–2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 250–273. doi:10.1080/15391523.2002.10782348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lix, L. M., Keselman, J. C., & Keselman, H. J. (1996). Consequences of assumption violations revisited: A quantitative review of alternatives to the one-way analysis of variance F test. Review of Educational Research, 66, 579–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maljers, A. (Ed.). (2007). Windows on CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in the European spotlight. European Platform for Dutch Education.

  • Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual education and content and language integrated learning. Paris, France: International Association for Cross-cultural Communication. Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne.

  • Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (2007). Diverse contexts-converging goals. CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D., Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols Martín, M. J. (2010). European framework for CLIL teacher education: A framework for the professional development of CLIL teachers.

  • Martin, S., Diaz, G., Sancristobal, E., Gil, R., Castro, M., & Peire, J. (2011). New technology trends in education: Seven years of forecasts and convergence. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1893–1906. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A. (2006). Presence: A unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 10(3), 197–206. doi:10.1007/s10055-006-0039-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Μpaltsavia, Μ. Μ. (2011). Content and Language Integrated Learning in a Greek State Junior High School Class (Master’s Thesis, Hellenic Open University).

  • Nelson, B. C., & Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Scientific inquiry in educational multi-user virtual environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 265–283. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9048-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Z., Cheok, A. D., Yang, H., Zhu, J., & Shi, J. (2006). Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Computers & Education, 30(1), 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2005.10.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panteli, N. (2009). Virtual social networks: A new dimension for virtuality research. Virtual Social Networks: Mediated, Massive and Multiplayer Sites, 1–17. doi: 10.1057/9780230250888.

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potosí, A., Jhoana, L., Guarín Loaiza, E. A., & López García, A. C. (2009). Using video materials as a teaching strategy for listening comprehension.

  • Prentza, A. (2013). From teaching English to adults to teaching children: the changes that a teacher has to make. MENON, 57.

  • Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shield, L. (2003). MOO as a language learning tool. Language learning online: Towards best practice, 97–122.

  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taiwo, R. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction: Language Structures and Social Interaction. IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.

  • Taylor, G. (n.d.) Making a Place for PowerPoint in EFL Classrooms. Retrieved from http://jaltcue.org/files/OnCUE/OCJ6-1/OCJ61%20pp%2041-51%20Taylor.pdf.

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Cambridge-ESOL (2014). Teaching Geography through English-a CLIL approach. Retrieved from: http://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/21-01-2014/teaching_geography_through_clil.pdf.

  • Vlachos, K. (2009). The potential of information communication technologies (ICT) in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): the case of English as a second/foreign language. CLIL practice: perspectives from the field. Juvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla, 189–198.

  • Zheng, D., & Newgarden, K. (2011). Rethinking language learning: Virtual Worlds as a Catalyst for Change.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Fokides.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fokides, E., Zampouli, C. Content and language integrated learning in OpenSimulator project. Results of a pilot implementation in Greece. Educ Inf Technol 22, 1479–1496 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9503-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9503-z

Keywords

Navigation