Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II evaluation of LY2603618, a first-generation CHK1 inhibitor, in combination with pemetrexed in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

  • PHASE II STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Introduction LY2603618 is a selective inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) protein kinase, a key regulator of the DNA damage checkpoint, and is predicted to enhance the effects of antimetabolites, such as pemetrexed. This phase II trial assessed the overall response rate, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LY2603618 and pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In this open-label, single-arm trial, patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC progressing after a prior first-line treatment regimen (not containing pemetrexed) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, day 1) and LY2603618 (150 mg/m2, day 2) every 21 days until disease progression. Safety was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Serial blood samples were collected for PK analysis after LY2603618 and pemetrexed administration. Expression of p53, as measured by immunohistochemistry and genetic variant analysis, was assessed as a predictive biomarker of response. Results Fifty-five patients were enrolled in the study. No patients experienced a complete response; a partial response was observed in 5 patients (9.1 %; 90 % CI, 3.7–18.2) and stable disease in 20 patients (36.4 %). The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months (range, 0–27.1). Safety and PK of LY2603618 in combination with pemetrexed were favorable. No association between p53 status and response was observed. Conclusions There was no significant clinical activity of LY2603618 and pemetrexed combination therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The results were comparable with historical pemetrexed single-agent data, with similar safety and PK profiles being observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reck M, Heigener DF, Mok T, Soria JC, Rabe KF (2013) Management of non-small-cell lung cancer: recent developments. Lancet 382:709–719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanchez Y, Wong C, Thoma RS, Richman R, Wu Z, Piwnica-Worms H, Elledge SJ (1997) Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 277:1497–1501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvo E, Chen VJ, Marshall M, Ohnmacht U, Hynes SM, Kumm E, Diaz HB, Barnard D, Merzoug FF, Huber L, Kays L, Iversen P, Calles A, Voss B, Lin AB, Dickgreber N, Wehler T, Sebastian M (2014) Preclinical analyses and phase I evaluation of LY2603618 administered in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer. Investig New Drugs 32:955–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiss G, Donehower R, Iyengar T, Ramanathan RK, Lewandowski K, Westin E, Hurt K, Hynes SM, Anthony SP, McKane S (2013) Phase I dose-escalation study to examine the safety and tolerability of LY2603618, a checkpoint 1 kinase inhibitor, administered 1 day after pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 21 days in patients with cancer. Investig New Drugs 31:136–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gottifredi V, Karni-Schmidt O, Shieh SS, Prives C (2001) p53 down-regulates CHK1 through p21 and the retinoblastoma protein. Mol Cell Biol 21:1066–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014) Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 511:543–550

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai Y, Grant S (2010) New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network. Clin Cancer Res 16:376–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. McNeely S, Beckmann R, Bence Lin AK (2014) CHEK again: revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 142:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alimta [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2012.

  11. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Kris MG (1995) Assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer: a guide for clinicians. In: Gralla RJ, Moinpour CM (eds) Assessing Quality of Life in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Guide for Clinicians. NCM Publishers, New York, pp. 57–63

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang P, Bowman L, Shen W, Winfree KB, Peterson P, John WJ (2012) The lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS) as a prognostic indicator of overall survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients: Post hoc analysis of a phase III study. J Clin Oncol 30(suppl):7075 [abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Obasaju C, Bowman L, Wang P, Shen W, Winfree KB, Smyth EN, Boye ME, John W, Brodowicz T, Belani CP (2013) Identifying the target NSCLC patient for maintenance therapy: an analysis from a placebo-controlled, phase III trial of maintenance pemetrexed (H3E-MC-JMEN). Ann Oncol 24:1534–1542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, de Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TC, Pless M, Muller T, Lim HL, Desch C, Szondy K, Gervais R, Shaharyar, Manegold C, Paul S, Paoletti P, Einhorn L, Bunn PA Jr (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 22:1589–1597

  17. Scagliotti G, Hanna N, Fossella F, Sugarman K, Blatter J, Peterson P, Simms L, Shepherd FA (2009) The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two phase III studies. Oncologist 14:253–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. King C, Diaz H, Barnard D, Barda D, Clawson D, Blosser W, Cox K, Guo S, Marshall M (2014) Characterization and preclinical development of LY2603618: a selective and potent Chk1 inhibitor. Investig New Drugs 32:213–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Daud AI, Ashworth MT, Strosberg J, Goldman JW, Mendelson D, Springett G, Venook AP, Loechner S, Rosen LS, Shanahan F, Parry D, Shumway S, Grabowsky JA, Freshwater T, Sorge C, Kang SP, Isaacs R (2015) Munster PN (2015) Phase I dose-escalation trial of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor MK-8776 as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 33:1060–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Infante JR, Hollebecque A, Postel-Vinay S, Bauer T, Blackwood B, Evangelista M, Mahrus S, Peale F, Lu X, Sahasranaman S, Zhu R, Chen Y, Ding X, Murray E, Schutzman J, Lauchle J, Soria J-C, LoRusso P (2015) Phase I study of GDC-0425, a checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in patients with refractory solid tumors. Cancer Res 75(15 suppl):nr CT139 [abstract]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sausville E, LoRusso P, Carducci M, Carter J, Quinn MF, Malburg L, Azad N, Cosgrove D, Knight R, Barker P, Zabludoff S, Agbo F, Oakes P, Senderowicz A (2014) Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:539–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Seto T, Esaki T, Hirai F, Arita S, Nosaki K, Makiyama A, Kometani T, Fujimoto C, Hamatake M, Takeoka H, Agbo F, Shi X (2013) Phase I, dose-escalation study of AZD7762 alone and in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 72:619–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho A, Bendell J, Cleary J, Schwartz GK, Burris HA, Oakes P, Agbo F, Barker PN, Senderowicz AM, Shapiro G (2011) Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of AZD7762 in combination with irinotecan (irino) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 29(suppl):3033 [abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gasco A, Molina-Vila M, Bertran-Alamillo J, Mayo C, Costa C, Capitan AG, Massuti B, Camps C, Costa EC, Ramirez SV, Martinez-Bueno A, Beniloch S, Capdevila L, Cros S, Porta R, Cardenal F, Bosch J, Sanchez JJ, Taron M, Rosell R (2012) Association of p53 mutations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) treated with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 30(suppl 15):e18143 [asbtract]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yamaguchi F, Kugawa S, Tateno H, Kokubu F, Fukuchi K (2012) Analysis of EGFR, KRAS and P53 mutations in lung cancer using cells in the curette lavage fluid obtained by bronchoscopy. Lung Cancer 78:201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Petitjean A, Mathe E, Kato S, Ishioka C, Tavtigian SV, Hainaut P, Olivier M (2007) Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database. Hum Mutat 28:622–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Robles AI, Linke SP, Harris CC (2002) The p53 network in lung carcinogenesis. Oncogene 21:6898–6907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Berghmans T, Mascaux C, Martin B, Ninane V, Sculier JP (2005) Prognostic role of p53 in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 25:2385–2389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang YC, Lin RK, Tan YH, Chen JT, Chen CY, Wang YC (2005) Wild-type p53 overexpression and its correlation with MDM2 and p14ARF alterations: an alternative pathway to non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:154–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all patients, their caregivers, and all investigators for their participation in the study. The authors thank Ignacio Garcias-Ribas and Eric Westin formerly of Eli Lilly and Company, now of Takeda Oncology, for their contributions to the CHK1 clinical program; Rodney L. Decker of Eli Lilly and Company for his assistance with the pharmacokinetic analysis; Sunil Kadam of Eli Lilly and Company for designing the p53 analysis; Jill Kolodsick of Eli Lilly and Company and Chastity Bradley of ClinGenuity, LLC for writing assistance; Elizabeth Kumm of InVentiv Health Clinical, LLC for statistical assistance; and Ben Legendre of Transgenomic for assisting with the TP53 functionality analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Scagliotti.

Ethics declarations

Financial disclosure

Giorgio Scagliotti has received honoraria from Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, and Clovis Oncology. Jin Hyoung Kang is an Advisory board member and has received research support from Eli Lilly and Company. Scott M. Hynes, Ji Lin, Emily Nash Smyth, Sameera Wijayawardana, and Aimee Bence Lin are all employees of Eli Lilly and Company and own Eli Lilly and Company stock.

Conflicts of interest

All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Sources of supports

Eli Lilly and Company.

Trial registration ID

A Study of Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer; NCT00988858.

Additional information

Key Message

This open-label, single-arm, phase II trial assessed the overall response rate, safety, and pharmacokinetics of CHK1 inhibitor LY2603618 and pemetrexed in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. No significant clinical activity of LY2603618 and pemetrexed combination therapy was observed, with results being comparable with historical pemetrexed single-agent data.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scagliotti, G., Kang, J.H., Smith, D. et al. Phase II evaluation of LY2603618, a first-generation CHK1 inhibitor, in combination with pemetrexed in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs 34, 625–635 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-016-0368-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-016-0368-1

Keywords

Navigation