Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling the initial phase of the human rod photoreceptor response to the onset of steady illumination

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The initial time course of the change in photoreceptor outer segment membrane conductance in response to light flashes has been modelled using biochemical analysis of phototransduction, and the model has been successfully applied to a range of in vitro recordings and has also been shown to provide a good fit to the leading edge of the electroretinogram a-wave recorded in vivo. We investigated whether a simple modification of the model’s equation would predict responses to the onset of steady illumination and tested this against electroretinogram recordings. Scotopic electroretinograms were recorded from three normal human subjects, using conductive fibre electrodes, in response to light flashes (0.30–740 scotopic cd m−2 s) and to the onset of steady light (11–1,900 scotopic cd m−2). Subjects’ pupils were dilated pharmacologically. The standard form of the model was applied to flash responses, as in previous studies, to obtain values for the three parameters: maximal response amplitude r max, sensitivity S and effective delay time t eff. A new “step response” equation was derived, and this equation provided a good fit to rod responses to steps of light using the same parameter values as for the flash responses. The results support the applicability of the model to the leading edge of electroretinogram responses: in each subject, the model could be used to fit responses both to flashes of light and to the onset of backgrounds with a single set of parameter values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr (1992) A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors. J Physiol 449:719–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr (2006) Phototransduction, dark adaptation, and rhodopsin regeneration the proctor lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5137–5152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hood DC, Birch DG (1995) Phototransduction in human cones measured using the alpha-wave of the ERG. Vis Res 35:2801–2810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG (1996) An alternative phototransduction model for human rod and cone ERG a-waves: normal parameters and variation with age. Vis Res 36:2609–2621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith NP, Lamb TD (1997) The a-wave of the human electroretinogram recorded with a minimally invasive technique. Vis Res 37:2943–2952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bush RA, Sieving PA (1994) A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:635–645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamison JA, Bush RA, Lei B, Sieving PA (2001) Characterization of the rod photoresponse isolated from the dark-adapted primate ERG. Vis Neurosci 18:445–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robson JG, Frishman LJ (1996) Photoreceptor and bipolar cell contributions to the cat electroretinogram: a kinetic model for the early part of the flash response. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 13:613–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robson JG, Saszik SM, Ahmed J, Frishman LJ (2003) Rod and cone contributions to the a-wave of the electroretinogram of the macaque. J Physiol 547:509–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robson JG, Frishman LJ (2011) The a-wave of the electroretinogram: importance of axonal currents. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: E-Abstract 692

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahroo OAR, Ban VS, Bussmann BM, Copley HC, Lamb TD (2011) A model for the electrical responses of human rod photoreceptors to the onset of steady backgrounds. Proc Physiol Soc 22:C08

    Google Scholar 

  12. Penn RD, Hagins WA (1972) Kinetics of the photocurrent of retinal rods. Biophys J 12(8):1073–1094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Breton ME, Schueller AW, Lamb TD, Pugh EN Jr (1994) Analysis of ERG a-wave amplification and kinetics in terms of the G-protein cascade of phototransduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:295–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hood DC, Birch DG (1994) Rod phototransduction in retinitis pigmentosa: estimation and interpretation of parameters derived from the rod a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2948–2961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hébert M, Vaegan LachapelleP (1999) Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode. Vis Res 39:1069–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naarendorp F, Williams GE (1999) The d-wave of the rod electroretinogram of rat originates in the cone pathway. Vis Neurosci 16:91–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank David Cunningham, Sara Haenzi, Rebecca Rewbury, Oshini Shivakumar and Mathew Vithayathil for assistance with experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar A. R. Mahroo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahroo, O.A.R., Ban, V.S., Bussmann, B.M. et al. Modelling the initial phase of the human rod photoreceptor response to the onset of steady illumination. Doc Ophthalmol 124, 125–131 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9316-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-012-9316-3

Keywords

Navigation