Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs on Patients with Intermediate and Advanced Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) therapy in intermediate and advanced hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.

Aims

The aim was to evaluate the effect of NAs therapy on survival of intermediate- and advanced-stage HBV-related HCC patients initially treated with chemoembolization.

Methods

A total of 1016 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B/C HBV-related HCC patients initially treated with chemoembolization were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to decrease heterogeneity between the antiviral and non-antiviral groups. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis were performed to evaluate the effects of NAs therapy on overall survival (OS).

Results

Antiviral group (n = 394) significantly prolonged OS compared with non-antiviral group (n = 622) (p = 0.003). NAs therapy (p < 0.001) along with tumor size (p = 0.002), tumor number (p = 0.001), gross vascular invasion (p < 0.001), metastasis (p < 0.001), α-fetoprotein (p < 0.001), Child–Pugh score (p = 0.008), aspartate aminotransferase (p < 0.001), and HBV DNA (p = 0.018) were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. After PSM processing, deducting the influence of subsequent treatments for HCC, NAs therapy was still identified as an independent protective factor (p = 0.009) for OS in patients who survived ≥ 7 months, regardless of BCLC stage B or C HCC.

Conclusion

NAs therapy prolongs OS in intermediate- and advanced-stage HBV-related HCC patients initially treated with chemoembolization. After PSM processing, patients who survived ≥ 7 months still benefited from NAs therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozakyol A. Global epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC epidemiology). J Gastrointest Cancer. 2017;48:238–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanaka M, Katayama F, Kato H, et al. Hepatitis B and C virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma in China: a review of epidemiology and control measures. J Epidemiol. 2011;21:401–416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Liver EAFTSOT. EASL. Clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong JW, Wong GH, Tsoi KF, et al. Meta-analysis: the efficacy of antiviral therapy in prevention of recurrence after curative treatment of chronic hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Therapeut. 2011;33:1104–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang T, Lu J-H, Zhai J, et al. High viral load is associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:683–691.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumada T, Toyoda H, Tada T, et al. Effect of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy on hepatocarcinogenesis in chronic hepatitis B patients: a propensity score analysis. J Hepatol. 2013;58:427–433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu C-Y, Chen Y-J, Ho HJ, et al. Association between nucleoside analogues and risk of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver resection. JAMA. 2012;308:1906–1913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zuo C, Xia M, Wu Q, Zhu H, Liu J, Liu C. Role of antiviral therapy in reducing recurrence and improving survival in hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma following curative resection. Oncol Lett. 2015;9:527–534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin J, Li N, Han Y, et al. Effect of antiviral treatment with nucleotide/nucleoside analogs on postoperative prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-stage longitudinal clinical study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3647–3655.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, Sone Y, Fujimori M. Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma: improved survival after concomitant treatment with nucleoside analogues. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:317–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu X, Huang P, Tian H, et al. Role of lamivudine with transarterial chemoembolization in the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1273–1278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu L, Gao H, Huang J, et al. Antiviral therapy in the improvement of survival of patients with hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1032–1039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Wen F, Li J, et al. A high baseline HBV load and antiviral therapy affect the survival of patients with advanced HBV-related HCC treated with sorafenib. Liver Int. 2015;35:2147–2154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou Z-G, Zheng X-R, Zhou Q, et al. Impact of oral anti-hepatitis B therapy on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma initially treated with chemoembolization. Chin J Cancer. 2015;34:14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong GH, Tse YK, Chan HY, Yip TF, Tsoi KF, Wong VS. Oral nucleos (t) ide analogues reduce recurrence and death in chronic hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Therapeut. 2016;43:802–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liver EAFTSOT. EASL–EORTC. Clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Satake M, Uchida H, Arai Y, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with lipiodol to treat hepatocellular carcinoma: survey results from the TACE study group of Japan. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2008;31:756–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bargellini I, Florio F, Golfieri R, Grosso M, Lauretti DL, Cioni R. Trends in utilization of transarterial treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a survey by the Italian Society of Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:438–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lao XM, Wang D, Shi M, et al. Changes in hepatitis B virus DNA levels and liver function after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2011;41:553–563.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lao XM, Luo G, Ye LT, et al. Effects of antiviral therapy on hepatitis B virus reactivation and liver function after resection or chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2013;33:595–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liver EAFTSOT. EASL. Clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009;50:227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat. 1985;39:33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Williams BA. Finding optimal cutpoints for continuous covariates with binary and time-to-event outcomes. 2006.

  24. Li X, Zhong X, Chen Z-H, et al. Hepatitis B virus DNA negativity acts as a favorable prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:9635–9641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sieghart W, Hucke F, Pinter M, et al. The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;57:2261–2273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pinter M, Sieghart W, Hucke F, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Aliment Pharmacol Therapeut. 2011;34:949–959.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dan J-Q, Zhang Y-J, Huang J-T, et al. Hepatitis B virus reactivation after radiofrequency ablation or hepatic resection for HBV-related small hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:865–872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang G, Lai EC, Lau WY, et al. Posthepatectomy HBV reactivation in hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma influences postoperative survival in patients with preoperative low HBV-DNA levels. Ann Surg. 2013;257:490–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jang JW. Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing anti-cancer therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:7675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen J, Lai L, Lin Q, et al. Hepatic resection after transarterial chemoembolization increases overall survival in large/multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study. Oncotarget. 2017;8:408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Long J, Zheng J-S, Sun B, Lu N. Microwave ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis after transarterial chemoembolization: a prospective study. Hepatol Int. 2016;10:175–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang TT, Liaw YF, Wu SS, et al. Long-term entecavir therapy results in the reversal of fibrosis/cirrhosis and continued histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2010;52:886–893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381:468–475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partly supported by project grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81773057).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XML is the correspondent author of this article and also acting as the submission’s guarantor. ZWJ, XWW, and ZXC have equally contributed to this article as first authors. XML conceived and designed the study. ZWJ, XWW, ZXC, JCW, and JYP collected and analyzed the data. ZWJ, XWW, ZXC, and XML interpreted the data. ZWJ, XWW, ZXC, and XML drafted or wrote the manuscript. XML obtained funding. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang-Ming Lao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Approved by the Institutional Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Patient consent

Obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 895 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jian, ZW., Wu, XW., Chen, ZX. et al. Effect of Nucleos(t)ide Analogs on Patients with Intermediate and Advanced Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 64, 2187–2198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05543-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05543-4

Keywords

Navigation