Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sofosbuvir-Containing Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis C Are Successful in the Safety-Net Population: A Real-World Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and experience high rates of health disparity. There are no data on real-world experience with highly efficacious direct-acting anti-HCV treatment in this population.

Aims

We aimed to evaluate the real-world experience with sofosbuvir-based regimens among a vulnerable HCV-infected population.

Methods

HCV treatment response was assessed among 204 patients who completed 12–24 weeks of sofosbuvir-based regimens (in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, simeprevir, ledipasvir, or daclatasvir) at the San Francisco safety-net healthcare system liver specialty clinic between January 2014 and December 2015. Virologic response during therapy was assessed at weeks 4 and 8, end of therapy, and 12-week treatment discontinuation (SVR 12).

Results

Patient characteristics were median age 58 years, 60 % male, 42 % Caucasian (21 % black, 19 % Hispanic), 72 % had genotype 1 (23 % genotype 2 or 3), and the median baseline log10 HCV viral load was 6.1 IU/ml and alanine transaminase 63 U/l. Cirrhosis was present in 36 % (of whom 40 % were decompensated), and 18 % were HCV treatment-experienced. Overall, SVR 12 was achieved in 97 % (99 % genotype 1, 100 % genotype 2, 84 % genotype 3). Five of six (83 %) patients who relapsed had decompensated cirrhosis, and 67 % were also non-adherent to therapy. On-treatment virologic response did not impact SVR.

Conclusions

High rates of sustained virologic response can be achieved in safety-net HCV-infected patients. Access to DAA-based regimens is critical to addressing HCV-related health disparity in this at-risk population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control. Viral hepatitis. http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/hcv/statisticshcv.htm. Accessed December 6, 2015.

  2. Centers for Disease Control. Notes from the field: risk factors for hepatitis C virus infections among young adults—Massachusetts, 2010. MMWR. 2011;60:1457–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis GL, Alter MJ, El-Serag H, Poynard T, Jennings LW. Aging of hepatitis C virus infected persons in the United States: a multiple cohort model of HCV prevalence and disease progression. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:513–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Razavi H, ElKhoury AC, Elbasha E, et al. Chronic hepatitis C disease burden and cost in the United States. Hepatology. 2013;57:2164–2170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Saab S, Jackson C, Nieto J, Francois F. Hepatitis C in African Americans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1576–1584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Singal AG, Yopp A, Skinner CS, Packer M, Lee WM, Tiro JA. Utilization of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among American patients: a systematic review. JGIM. 2012;27:861–867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen GC, Segev DL, Thuluvath PJ. Racial disparities in the management of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension: a national study. Hepatology. 2007;45:1282–1289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Quillin RC III, Wilson GC, Wima K, et al. Neighborhood level effects of socioeconomic status on liver transplant selection and recipient survival. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1934–1941.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moyer VA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in adults: a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:349–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bumenthal D. Health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act—a progress report. N Engl J Med. 2014;17:275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2013. MMWR. 2013;62:1–186. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdf.

  12. Guerra V, McMahon S. Charity care organizations as navigators: considerations for guiding consumers toward the best coverage options. Center for Health Care Strategies. February 2014. http://www.chcs.org/usr_doc/Charity_Care_as_Navigators_02414.pdf.

  13. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The 2013 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to congress. November 2013. http://www.onecpd.info/resources/documents/AHAR‐2013‐Part1.pdf.

  14. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Current statistics on the prevalence and characteristics of people experiencing homelessness in the United States. July 2011. http://homeless.samhsa.gov/ResourceFiles/hrc_factsheet.pdf.

  15. Sood S, Wong D, Holmes A, Everall I, Saling M, Nicoll A. Depression in a real world population of hepatitis C patients. J Gastroenterol Pancreatol Liver Disord. 2014;30:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Surjadi M, Torreullas C, Ayala C, Yee HF Jr, Khalili M. Formal patient education improves patients’ knowledge of hepatitis C in vulnerable populations. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:213–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lubega S, Agbim U, Surjadi M, Mahoney M, Khalili M. Formal hepatitis C education enhances HCV care coordination, expedites HCV treatment and improves antiviral response. Liver Int. 2013;33:999–1007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bindman AB, Chen A, Fraser JS, Yee HF Jr, Ofman D. Healthcare reform with a safety net: lessons from San Francisco. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:747–750.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Terrault N, Zeuzem S, Di Bisceglie AM, et al. Effectiveness of ledipasvir–sofosbuvir combination in patients with hepatitis C virus infection and factors associated of sustained virologic response. Gastroenterology. 2016. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.004.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lawitz E, Sulkowski MS, Ghalib R, et al. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study. The Lancet. 2014;384:1756–1765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawitz E, Mangia A, Wyles D, et al. Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1878–1887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Afdhal N, Zeuzem S, Kwo P, et al. for the ION-1 Investigators. Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1402454.

  23. Backus LI, Belperio PS, Shahoumian TA, Loomis TP, Mole LA. Effectiveness of sofosbuvir-based regimens in genotype 1 and 2 hepatitis C virus infection in 4026 U.S. Veterans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:559–573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Butt AA, Yan P, Shaikh OS, Chung RT, Sherman KE, ERCHIVES study. Sofosbuvir-based regimens in clinical practice achieve SVR rates closer to clinical trials: results from ERCHIVES. Liver Int. 2016;36:651–658. doi:10.1111/liv.13036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu CJ, Roytman MD, Hong LK, et al. Real-world experience with sofosbuvir-based regimens for chronic hepatitis C, including patients with factors previously associated with inferior treatment response. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2015;74:3–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. American Association for the Study of Liver Disease/Infectious Diseases Society of America. HCV guidance: recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. hcvguidelines.org. Accessed January 23, 2016.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health K24AA022523 (to M.K.) and P30 DK026743 (UCSF Liver Center).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandana Khalili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript. Dr. Khalili has research grant support from Gilead Inc and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and has participated in the advisory boards of Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Inc, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beck, K.R., Kim, N. & Khalili, M. Sofosbuvir-Containing Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis C Are Successful in the Safety-Net Population: A Real-World Experience. Dig Dis Sci 61, 3602–3608 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4340-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4340-x

Keywords

Navigation