Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in the Elderly: Long-Term Outcomes and Microbiota Changes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aims

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has become the cornerstone in management of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI) in adults. However, data on efficacy, safety, long-term outcomes, and microbiota alterations are limited in elderly patients (>65 years).

Methods

Twenty-nine consecutive elderly patients with RCDI underwent FMT with combined jejunal and colonic method and monitored for long-term outcomes. Fecal samples from five elderly RCDI patients (G65) were subjected to genomic analysis before and after FMT, and microbiota changes were compared with matched RCDI patients below 65 years (L65).

Results

FMT resulted in marked improvement in all clinical parameters, including abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea in all elderly RCDI patients. Fecal C. difficile toxin was positive in all 29 patients and turned negative in all 27 patients, who agreed to undergo this test after FMT. Statistically significant improvement in leukocytosis was noted (p < 0.05). Only adverse events reported were transient mild fever (2/29) and bloating (3/29). Long-term follow-up over 25.4 ± 12.8 months did not reveal any additional adverse events or RCDI recurrence. Genomic analysis suggested that overall microbiota diversity increased post-FMT in elderly RCDI patients. However, this response was less robust than the younger group. While Firmicutes did not change markedly, Proteobacteria decreased significantly in post-FMT samples in elderly RCDI patients.

Conclusions

These observations suggest that FMT in elderly patients with RCDI appears to be highly efficacious with no recurrence of infection over long-term follow-up. Alterations in microbiota in this group of patients are characterized by less robust increase in microbial diversity and marked reduction in phylum Proteobacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lessa FC, Yi Mu, Bamberg WM, et al. Burden of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:825–834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garg S, Mirza YR, Girotra M, et al. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD): a shift from hospital-acquired infection to long-term care facility-based infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3407–3412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khanna S, Pardi DS, Aronson SL, et al. The epidemiology of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez C, Korsak N, Taminiau B, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in elderly nursing home residents. Anaerobe. 2014;30:184–187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zapata HJ, Quagliarello VJ. The microbiota and microbiome in aging: potential implications in health and age-related diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:776–781.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Minino AM, Xu J, Kochanek KD. National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol 59, number 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr59/nvsr59_02.pdf.

  7. Drekonja D, Reich J, Gezahegn S, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:630–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dutta SK, Girotra M, Garg S, et al. Efficacy of combined jejunal and colonic fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1572–1576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Walia R, Garg S, Song Y, et al. Efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in 2 children with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection and its impact on their growth and gut microbiome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59:565–570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SS, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4680–4687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, et al. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2014;2:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Song Y, Garg S, Girotra M, et al. Microbiota dynamics in patients treated with fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Masella AP, Bartram AK, Truszkowski JM, et al. PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson MC, Morrison HG, Benjamino J, et al. Analysis, optimization and verification of Illumina-generated 16 s rrna gene amplicon surveys. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M. Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kassam Z, Lee CH, Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:500–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:994–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Emanuelsson F, Claesson BE, Ljungstr ML, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation and bacteriotherapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a retrospective evaluation of 31 patients. Scand J Infect Dis. 2014;46:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubin TA, Gessert CE, Aas J, et al. Fecal microbiome transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: report on a case series. Anaerobe. 2013;19:22–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mattila E, Uusitalo-Seppala R, Wuorela M, et al. Fecal transplantation, through colonoscopy, is effective therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:490–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brandt LJ, Aroniadis OC, Mellow M, et al. Long-term followup of colonoscopic fecal microbiota transplant for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1079–1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim KA, Gu W, Lee IA, et al. High fat diet-induced gut microbiota exacerbates inflammation and obesity in mice via the TLR4 signaling pathway. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zapata HJ, Quagliarello VJ. Microbiota and microbiome in aging: potential implications in health and age-related diseases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63:776–781.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Magrone T, Jirillo E. The interaction between gut microbiota and age-related changes in immune function and inflammation. Immun Ageing. 2013;10:31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Drago L, Toscano M, Rodighiero V, et al. Cultivable and pyrosequenced fecal microflora in centenarians and young subjects. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:S81–S84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Biagi E, Candela M, Turroni S, et al. Ageing and gut microbes: perspectives for health maintenance and longevity. Pharmacol Res. 2013;69:11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shahinas D, Silverman M, Sittler T, et al. Toward an understanding of changes in diversity associated with fecal microbiome transplantation based on 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing. mBio. 2012;3:e00338-12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00338-12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Weingarden A, González A, Vázquez-Baeza Y, et al. Dynamic changes in short- and long-term bacterial composition following fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Microbiome. 2015;3:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamilton MJ, Weingarden AR, Unno T, et al. High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria. Gut Microbes. 2013;4:125–135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang W, Chen L, Zhou R, et al. Increased proportions of Bifidobacterium and the Lactobacillus group and loss of butyrate-producing bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:398–406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Machiels K, Joossens M, Sabino J, et al. A decrease of the butyrate-producing species Roseburia hominis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii defines dysbiosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2014;63:1275–1283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Antharam VC, Li EC, Ishmael A, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis and depletion of butyrogenic bacteria in Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial diarrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2884–2892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Gastroenterology Research Fund, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD (Contributors: Weinberg Foundation, Eric Cowan Fund, Friedman & Friedman Law Firm Fund through their grants to Drs. Dutta and Girotra), and the Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.

Author contributions

Mohit Girotra, Shashank Garg and Rohit Anand were involved in study concept and design, acquisition of data, collection and storage of samples, analysis and interpretation of data, review of literature, and drafting of manuscript and participated in patient interviews. Yang Song performed the microbiota genomic analysis and analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the microbiota section of the manuscript. Sudhir Dutta was involved in study concept and design, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, obtained funding, administrative and material support and study supervision, performed the endoscopic procedures, and was in-charge of patient care and the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudhir K. Dutta.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 112 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Girotra, M., Garg, S., Anand, R. et al. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in the Elderly: Long-Term Outcomes and Microbiota Changes. Dig Dis Sci 61, 3007–3015 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4229-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4229-8

Keywords

Navigation