Abstract
Background
Percutaneous drainage (PCD) is now the first-line drainage method for liver abscess because of its minimal invasiveness and high technical success rate. However, this procedure has several disadvantages, such as extra-drainage and self-tube removal. Recently, EUS-guided liver abscess drainage (EUS-AD) has been developed. However, only a few reports of EUS-AD have been reported. In addition, the clinical benefits of PCD and EUS-AD have not been reported.
Aims
In the present study, the safety and feasibility of EUS-AD using fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) and the clinical outcomes of EUS-AD and PCD were examined retrospectively.
Methods
Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent PCD or EUS-AD between April 2012 and April 2015 were included in this study. EUS-AD was performed using FCSEMS. In addition, to prevent stent migration, 7-Fr pig tail plastic stent was placed within FCSEMS.
Results
Technical success was achieved in all patients of both groups. Clinical success was 100 % in the EUS-AD group although it was 89 % in PCD group (P = 034). Three adverse events were seen in the PCD group (self-tube removal n = 1, tube migration n = 2), but no adverse events were seen in the EUS-AD group. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the EUS-AD group than in the PCD group (21 vs 41 days, P = 0.03).
Conclusion
Because of the short hospital stay, the high clinical success rate, and the low adverse event rate compared to PCD, EUS-AD has potential as a first-line treatment for liver abscess.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yu CHS, Ho SMS, Lau WY, et al. Treatment of pyogenic liver abscess: prospective randomized comparison of catheter drainage and needle aspiration. Hepatology. 2004;4:932–938.
Zerem E, Hadzic A. Sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage versus needle aspiration in the management of pyogenic liver abscess. AJR. Am J Roentegnol. 2007;3:W138–W142.
Tan YM, Chung YFA, Chow KHP, et al. An appraisal of surgical and percutaneous drainage for pyogenic liver abscesses lager than 5cm. Ann Surg. 2005;3:485–490.
Huang CJ, Pitt HA, Lipsett PA, et al. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. Changing trends over 42 years. Ann Surg. 1996;223:600–609.
Rahimian J, Wilson T, Orman V, et al. Pyogenic liver abscess: recent trends in etiology and mortality. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;11:1654–1659.
Ogura T, Higuchi K. Dose endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage really have clinical impact? World J Gastroenterol. 2015;28:1049–1052.
Itoi T, Yasud I, Kurihara T, et al. Technique of endoscopic ulrasonography-guided pancreatic duct intervention (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:E4–E9.
Seewald S, Imazu H, Omar S, et al. EUS-guided drainage of hepatic abscess. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:495–498.
Ang TL, Seewald S, Teo EK, et al. EUS-guided drainage of ruptured liver abscesses. Endoscopy. 2009;41:E21–E22.
Noh SH, Park do H, Kim YR, et al. EUS-guided drainage of hepatic abscesses not accessible to percutaneous drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1314–1319.
Itoi T, Ang T, Seewald S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided drainage for tuberculous liver abscess drainage. Dig Endosc. 2011;23:158–161.
Keohane J, DiMaio CJ, Schattner MA, et al. EUS guided transgastric drainage of caudate lobe liver abscess. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011;1:139–141.
Medrado BF, Carneiro FO, Vilaça TG, et al. Ensoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of giant liver abscess associated with transgastric migration of self-expandable metallic stent. Endoscopu. 2013;45:E331–E332.
Alcaide N, Vargas-Garcia AL, de la Serna-Higuera C, et al. EUS-guided drainage of liver abscess by using a lumen-apposing metal stent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:941–942. (discussion 942).
Kawakami H, Kawakubo K, Kuwatani M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage using a dedicated, wide, fully covered self-expandable metallic stent with flared-ends. Endoscopy. 2014;46:E982–E983.
Tonozuka R, Itoi T, Tsuchiya T, et al. EUS-guided drainage of hepatic abscess and infected biloma using short and long metal stent (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. Epub. 04/02/2015.
Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse event: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.
Onder A, Kapan M, Böyük A, et al. Surgical management of pyogenic liver abscess. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011;15:1182–1186.
Ferraioli G, Garlaschelli A, Zanaboni D, et al. Percutaneous and surgical treatment of pyogenic liver abscesses: observation over a 21-year period in 148 patients. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:690–696.
Ogura T, Sano S, Onda S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for right hepatic bile duct obstruction: novel technical tips. Endoscopy. 2015;47:72–75.
Ogura T, Masuda D, Imoto A, et al. Novel method of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepacticogastrostomy to prevent for stent migration. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1815–1821.
Itoi T, Isayama H, Sofuni A, et al. Stent selection and tips on placement technique of EUS-guided biliary drainage: transduodenal and transgastric stenting. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18:664–672.
Bapaye A, Itoi T, Kongkam P, et al. New fully covered large-bore wide-flare removable metal stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: results of a multicenter study. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:499–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
After liver abscess was punctured, the contrast medium was injected. Then, 0.025 inch guidewire was inserted. To dilate fistula, ERCP catheter was inserted. Fully covered self-expandable metallic stent was successfully placed from liver abscess and the duodenum. Supplementary material 1 (AVI 24657 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogura, T., Masuda, D., Saori, O. et al. Clinical Outcome of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Abscess Drainage Using Self-Expandable Covered Metallic Stent (with Video). Dig Dis Sci 61, 303–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3841-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3841-3