Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incidental Colonic 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake: Do We Need Colonoscopy for Patients with Focal Uptake Confined to the Left-Sided Colon?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/Aims

Although access to [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography and computed axial tomography (PET/CT) for patients with malignancy has increased, little information is available on the suitability of PET/CT for diagnosis of advanced colonic neoplasms in oncology patients and on the clinical significance of incidental 18F-FDG focal uptake confined to the left-sided colon.

Methods

Patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT followed, within 90 days, by colonoscopy were identified. Case–control analysis was undertaken to determine whether focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon was associated with advanced neoplasms in the right-sided colon.

Results

One hundred ninety-five patients with colonic 18F-FDG uptake and 561 without colonic 18F-FDG uptake were identified. Of the 195 patients with focal colonic 18F-FDG activity, 103 patients (52.8 %) had 145 advanced colonic neoplasms, including 58 colon cancers and 11 metastatic cancers. In the detection of advanced colonic neoplasms, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of PET/CT were 54.4, 82.4, 46.9, and 86.3 %, respectively. Overall accuracy was 76.2 %. Ten (8.0 %) of the 125 patients with focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon had three colon cancers and seven advanced adenomas in the right-sided colon. Case–control analysis revealed that focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon was associated with an advanced neoplasms in the right-sided colon (OR, 3.02; 95 % CI, 1.12–8.13; P = 0.023).

Conclusions

Colonic focal 18F-FDG uptake by oncology patients warrants endoscopic verification. Complete colon evaluation by colonoscopy is required, even for patients with focal 18F-FDG uptake confined to the left-sided colon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang G, Lau EW, Shakher R, et al. How do oncologists deal with incidental abnormalities on whole-body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT? Cancer. 2007;109:117–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Juweid ME, Cheson BD. Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:496–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:480–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prabhakar HB, Sahani DV, Fischman AJ, Mueller PR, Blake MA. Bowel hot spots at PET-CT. Radiographics. 2007;27:145–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin M, Koo JH, Abi-Hanna D. Management of patients following detection of unsuspected colon lesions by PET imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1025–1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kei PL, Vikram R, Yeung HW, Stroehlein JR, Macapinlac HA. Incidental finding of focal FDG uptake in the bowel during PET/CT: CT features and correlation with histopathologic results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:401–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weston BR, Iyer RB, Qiao W, Lee JH, Bresalier RS, Ross WA. Ability of integrated positron emission and computed tomography to detect significant colonic pathology: the experience of a tertiary cancer center. Cancer. 2010;116:1454–1461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutman F, Alberini JL, Wartski M, et al. Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:495–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Israel O, Yefremov N, Bar-Shalom R, et al. PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:758–762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamel EM, Thumshirn M, Truninger K, et al. Significance of incidental 18F-FDG accumulations in the gastrointestinal tract in PET/CT: correlation with endoscopic and histopathologic results. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1804–1810.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee ST, Tan T, Poon AM, et al. Role of low-dose, noncontrast computed tomography from integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography in evaluating incidental 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose-avid colon lesions. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008;10:48–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JC, Hartnett GF, Hughes BG. Ravi Kumar AS. The segmental distribution and clinical significance of colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake incidentally detected on PET-CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2009;30:333–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tatlidil R, Jadvar H, Bading JR, Conti PS. Incidental colonic fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: correlation with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings. Radiology. 2002;224:783–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ravizza D, Bartolomei M, Santoro L, et al. Positron emission tomography for the detection of colorectal adenomas. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:185–190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sung JJ, Lau JY, Goh KL, Leung WK. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in Asia: implications for screening. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:871–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eom BW, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:106–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher CS, Wachtel MS, Margenthaler JA. Outcomes for patients who develop both breast and colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:242–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Benson AB, Choti MA, Cohen AM, et al. NCCN practice guidelines for colorectal cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2000;14:203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh MM, Singh E, Miller H, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in women with endometrial cancer: are we following the guidelines? J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012;43:190–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hemandas AK, Robson NK, Hickish T, Talbot RW. Colorectal tubulovillous adenomas identified on fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:386–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whiteford MH, Whiteford HM, Yee LF, et al. Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:759–767.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yasuda S, Fujii H, Nakahara T, et al. 18F-FDG PET detection of colonic adenomas. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:989–992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, et al. Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group. Gut. 2005;54:807–813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Strul H, Kariv R, Leshno M, et al. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40–80 years. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;10:255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mawlawi O, Podoloff DA, Kohlmyer S, et al. Performance characteristics of a newly developed PET/CT scanner using NEMA standards in 2D and 3D modes. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1734–1742.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Treglia G, Calcagni ML, Rufini V, et al. Clinical significance of incidental focal colorectal [(18) F]FDG uptake: our experience and a review of the literature. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14:174–180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mower WR. Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byeong Gwan Kim.

Additional information

Changhyun Lee and Seong-Joon Koh contributed equally to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, C., Koh, SJ., Kim, J.W. et al. Incidental Colonic 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake: Do We Need Colonoscopy for Patients with Focal Uptake Confined to the Left-Sided Colon?. Dig Dis Sci 58, 229–235 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2333-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2333-y

Keywords

Navigation