Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease as Measured by the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of reflux disease is increasing. Health-care utilization including physician visits for this disorder is lacking. Our purpose was to analyze the trend in physician visits for GERD from the period 1995–2006 using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. We also sought to determine health-care utilization for GERD indirectly by assessing prescription trends for proton-pump inhibitors and H2 receptor blockers during the period.

Methods

The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey is a survey of approximately 3,000 office-based physicians that uses a three-stage probability sampling procedure to allow extrapolation to the US population. All visits between 1995 and 2006 for symptoms and/or diagnoses compatible with GERD were combined into a single categorical variable. Weighted data was utilized for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis.

Results

After weighting, there were N = 321,513 adult ambulatory care encounters for all diagnoses. Visits for reflux increased throughout the examined period. Using logistic regression, visits for reflux were associated with female gender, age over 40, and calcium channel blocker use. Proton-pump inhibitor use increased substantially during the study period while H2 blocker use declined. Family practitioners and internists saw the majority of reflux patients.

Conclusions

The frequency of ambulatory visits in the United States for gastroesophageal reflux disease increased significantly between 1995 and 2006. The use of PPI therapy is increasing even more substantially. Older age, female gender, and use of calcium channel blockers were associated with a higher frequency of GERD visits. Health-care utilization for this disorder is increasing perhaps due to our ever-increasing epidemic of obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klauser AG, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. Symptoms in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lancet. 1990;335(8683):205–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirano I, Richter JE. Practice parameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(3):668–685. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00936.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nebel OT, Fornes MF, Castell DO. Symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: incidence and precipitating factors. Am J Dig Dis. 1976;21:953–956. doi:10.1007/BF01071906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kjellen G, Tibbling L. Manometric oesophageal function, acid perfusion test and symptomatology in a 55-year-old general population. Clin Physiol. 1981;1(4):405–415. doi:10.1111/j.1475-097X.1981.tb00908.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson WG, Heaton KW. Heartburn and globus in apparently healthy people. Can Med Assoc J. 1982;126(1):46–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruth M, Mansson I, Sandberg N. The prevalence of symptoms suggestive of esophageal disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1991;26(1):73–81. doi:10.3109/00365529108996486.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Locke GR III, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(5):1448–1456. doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(97)70025-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuster E, Ros E, Toledo-Pimentel V, et al. Predictive factors of the long-term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six-year follow up of 107 patients. Gut. 1994;35(1):8–14. doi:10.1136/gut.35.1.8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McDougall NI, Johnston BT, Kee F, et al. Natural history of reflux oesophagitis: a 10-year follow up of its effect on patient symptomatology and quality of life. Gut. 1996;38(4):481–486. doi:10.1136/gut.38.4.481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Agreus L, Svardsudd K, Talley NJ, et al. Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional abdominal disorders: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(10):2905–2914.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Small PK, Loudon MA, Waldron B, et al. Importance of reflux symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Gut. 1995;36(2):189–192. doi:10.1136/gut.36.2.189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Serag HB, Petersen NJ, Carter J, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux among different racial groups in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(7):1692–1699. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Spechler SJ, Jain SK, Tendler DA, et al. Racial differences in the frequency of symptoms and complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;16(10):1795–1800. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01351.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burt CW, Hing E. Making patient-level estimates from medical encounter records using a multiplicity estimator. Stat Med. 2007;26(8):1762–1774. doi:10.1002/sim.2797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Castell DO. A practical approach to heartburn. Hosp Pract (Minneap). 1999;34(12):89–94. 97–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Avasarala JR, O’Donovan CA, Roach SE, et al. Analysis of NAMCS data for multiple sclerosis, 1998–2004. BMC Med. 2007;5:6. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-5-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Balkrishnan R, Sansbury JC, Shenolikar RA, et al. Prescribing patterns for topical retinoids within NAMCS data. J Drugs Dermatol. 2005;4(2):172–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gupta AK, Cooper EA, Feldman SR, et al. A survey of office visits for actinic keratosis as reported by NAMCS, 1990–1999. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Cutis. 2002;70(Suppl(2)):8–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Quinn J, McDermott D. Syncope and NAMCS. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(4):381. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2005.tb01964.x. Author reply 381–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scholle SH, Chang J, Harman J, et al. Characteristics of patients seen and services provided in primary care visits in obstetrics/gynecology: data from NAMCS and NHAMCS. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1119–1127. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scholle SH, Chang JC, Harman J, et al. Trends in women’s health services by type of physician seen: data from the 1985 and 1997–98 NAMCS. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12(4):165–177. doi:10.1016/S1049-3867(02)00139-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, et al. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005;54(5):710–717. doi:10.1136/gut.2004.051821.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Nyren O. Association between body mass and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(11):883–890.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Edelstein ZR, Farrow DC, Bronner MP, et al. Central adiposity and risk of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(2):403–411. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2007.05.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hughes J, Lockhart J, Joyce A. Do calcium antagonists contribute to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and concomitant noncardiac chest pain? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64(1):83–89. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02851.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jenkinson LR, Norris TL, Watson A. Gastro-oesophageal reflux associated with nifedipine. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1988;2(4):337–339.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lagergren J, Bergstrom R, Adami HO, Nyren O. Association between medications that relax the lower esophageal sphincter and risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:165–175.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Locke GR III, Talley NJ, Fett SL, et al. Risk factors associated with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Med. 1999;106:642–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruigomez A, Wallander MA, Johansson S, et al. Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosed in UK general practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:751–760.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank K. Friedenberg.

Additional information

Previously Published: Friedenberg FK, Nehemia D, Xanthopoulos M, Nelson DB, Richter JE. Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease as Assessed by the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Am J Gastro September 2007 102:S428:A841. Poster Presentation at the 72nd ACG Annual Scientific Meeting, October 2007, Philadelphia, PA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedenberg, F.K., Hanlon, A., Vanar, V. et al. Trends in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease as Measured by the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Dig Dis Sci 55, 1911–1917 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-1004-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-1004-0

Keywords

Navigation