Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Structural Modelling Approach to Predict Adolescent Offending Behaviour from Family, School and Community Factors

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It seems undeniable that immediate social contexts exert an important influential role on adolescent behavioural adjustment. Research thus far has found that certain family, school and community/neighbourhood environment characteristics may influence a youth’s involvement in risk activities such as antisocial behaviour and drug use, and even delinquent behaviour. However, the mechanisms that link these characteristics to such behaviours have not yet been thoroughly analysed and prior research has focused mainly on adult populations. The objective of this study was to analyse the joint contribution of specific factors, deriving from family, school and society, which have an effect on levels of drug consumption, antisocial and offending behaviour, in a sample of 2528 youths (aged 10 to 16). In particular, in accounting for involvement in risk activities and ultimately in offending behaviour, we examined interactions among the following variables: living in a disadvantaged community, quality of relationship with parents, distrust in local police, attitude to social norms, and rejection of and from school (truancy, suspension and expulsion). A structural equation model was calculated to account for these interactions, which revealed patterns of influence with important practical implications related to social policies on risk behaviours in adolescence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). Amos 6.0 User's Guide. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.

  • Arum, R., & Beattie, I. R. (1999). High school experience and the risk of adult incarceration. Criminology, 37, 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, G. M., & Farrell, M. P. (1992). Parental support and control as predictors of adolescent drinking, delinquency, and related problem behaviour. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 763–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M. J., & Li, S. A. (1996). The relation of family support to adolescents’ psychological distress and behavior problems. In G. R. Pierce, and I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 313-343). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Barry, M. (2006). Youth offending in transition: the search for social recognition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista, J. M., & Coenders, G. (2000). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales [Structural Equation Models]. Madrid: La Muralla.

  • Baumrind, D. (1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and Society, 9, 239–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P., & Wu, E. (2002). EQS 6 for windows user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

  • Brook, J., Whiteman, M., Finch, S., & Cohen, P. (1996). Young adult drug use and delinquency: Childhood antecedents and adolescent mediators. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1584–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

  • Butters, J. E. (2002). Family stressors and adolescent cannabis use: A pathway to problem use. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., Hattie, J., Durkin, K., & Houghton, S. (2001). Goal-setting and reputation enhancement: behavioural choices among delinquent, at-risk and not at-risk adolescents. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Hattie, J., & Durkin, K. (1999). Adolescent reputation enhancement: Differentiating delinquent, nondelinquent, and at-risk youths. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 593–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. R. (1990). Drugs and predatory crime. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 203–239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, J., & Taylor, G. S. (1983). The socially constructed and situational context for assessment of police services. Social Science Quarterly, 63, 264–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, J., Howard, J., Keogh, Y., & Seidler, K. (2003). Patterns and correlates of alcohol and other drug use among juvenile detainees in New South Wales. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & White, R. (2002). Juvenile justice: Youth and crime in Australia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaray, M. P., & Malecki, C. K. (2002). The relationship between perceived social support and maladjustment for students at risk. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, R. E., & Kampfe, C. M. (1994). The relationship between family variables and adolescent substance abuse: a literature review. Adolescence, 29, 475–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., & Reicher, S. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., & Reicher, S. (2005). Delinquency: cause or consequence of social exclusion? In D. Abrams, J. Marques, & M. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 211–241). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., Ohana, J., & Moscovici, S. (1987). Children’s beliefs about institutional roles: a cross-national study of representations of the teacher’s role. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emler, N., Ohana, J., & Dickinson, J. (1990). Children’s representations of social relations. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Dirs.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 47-69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Estévez, E., Murgui, S., Moreno, D., & Musitu, G. (2007). Estilos de comunicación familiar, actitud hacia la autoridad institucional y conducta violenta del adolescente en la escuela [Family communication styles, attitude towards institutional authority, and adolescent violent behavior at school]. Psicothema, 19, 108-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flisher, A. J., Evans, J., Muller, M., & Lombard, C. (2004). Brief report: Test–retest reliability of self-reported adolescent risk behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 207-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, P. J. (1989). Drugs and crime. In N. A. Weiner & M. E. Wolfgang (Eds.), Pathways to criminal violence (pp. 16–48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, Y. G., & Frank, J. (2000). How kids view cops. The nature of juvenile attitudes toward the police. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesen, G. F. (1969). Crime doesn’t pay: Correlates of a shared misunderstanding. Social Problems, 17, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, M. (1994). Family, school, delinquency and criminality, the predictive power of an elaborated social control theory for males. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 4, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennings, C. J., Copeland, J., & Howard, J. (2003). Substance use patterns of young offenders and violent crime. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 414–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, K. S. (2001). The relationship between adolescent attitudes towards authority, self-concept, and delinquency. Adolescence, 36, 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeber, R. (1996). Developmental continuity, change and pathways in male juvenile problem behaviours and delinquency. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: current theories (pp. 28–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., & Marsh, J. (2005). Disconnected youth? Growing up in poor Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAra, L. (2004). Truancy, school exclusion and substance misuse. Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime, number 4. Edinburgh: Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007). Criminal justice transitions. Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime, number 14. Edinburgh: Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J., Widom, C. S., & Crowell, N. A. (2001). Juvenile crime. Juvenile justice. Panel on juvenile crime: Prevention, treatment, and control. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, A., March, G., Price, B., & Hwang, Y. (1992). A study of race and gender bias in the punishment of school children. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life course-persistent antisocial behaviour developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (2006). Life-course-persistent and adolescent-limited antisocial behaviour. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology (Risk, disorder, and adaptation, Vol. 3, pp. 385–395). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molpeceres, M. A., Llinares, L. I., & Bernad, J. C. (1999). Perception of formal and informal authority and delinquent behavior in adolescence: a preliminary analysis. Intervención Psicosocial, 8, 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncher, F. J., & Miller, G. E. (1999). Nondelinquent youths’ stealing behaviour and their perceptions of parents, school, and peers. Adolescence, 34, 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, C., & Thompson, F. (1985). The representation of authority: an adolescent viewpoint. Journal of Adolescence, 8, 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musitu, G., Estévez, E., & Emler, N. (2007). Adjustment problems in the family and school context, attitude towards authority, and violent behaviour at school in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 779–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, W., Mastekaasa, A., & Wichstrom, L. (2001). Conduct problems and early cannabis initiation: a longitudinal study of gender differences. Addiction, 96, 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, L. J. (2006). Children growing up in a violent community: the role of the family. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 558–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudney, S. (2002). The road to ruin? Sequences of initiation into drug use and offending by young people in Britain (Home Office Research Study 253). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reebye, P., Moretti, M. M., & Lessard, J. C. (1995). Conduct disorder and substance use disorder: comorbidity in a clinical sample of preadolescent and adolescents. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 313–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritakallio, M., Kaltiala-Heino, R., Kivivuori, J., & Rimpelä, M. (2005). Brief report: Delinquent behaviour and depression in middle adolescence: a Finnish community sample. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 155-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, L. N., & McEvoy, L. (1990). Conduct problems as predictors of substance abuse. In L. R. Robins & M. Rutter (Eds.), Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubini, M., & Palmonari, A. (1998). The effect of school maladjustment and membership of adolescent peer-groups on the orientation to the institutional system. 6th Biennial Conference of the EARA, Budapest.

  • Rutter, M., Giller, M., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behaviour by young people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2004a). Neighbourhood and community: Collective efficacy and community safety. New Economy, 11, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. (2004b). Networks and neighbourhoods: The implications of connectivity for thinking about crime in the modern city. In H. McCarthy, P. Miller, & P. Skidmore (Eds.), Network logic: who governs in an interconnected world? (pp. 157–166). London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa, A., & Haden, S. C. (2006). Community violence victimization and aggressive behavior: the moderating effects of coping and social support. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. J. (2006). School experience and delinquency at ages 13 to 16. Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime, number 13. Edinburgh: Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipak, B. (1979). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39, 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarry, H., & Emler, N. (2007). Attitudes, values and moral reasoning as predictors of delinquency. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Joon Jang, S. (1991). Testing interactional theory: An examination of reciprocal causal relationships among family, school, and delinquency. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. (2006). Why people obey the law. Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Hou, Y. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and court. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C., MacDonald, R., & Simpson, M. (2006). Predicting criminality? Risk factors, neighborhood influence and desistance. Youth Justice, 6, 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, E. H., Loeber, R., & White, H. R. (2004). Teasing apart the developmental associations between alcohol and marijuana use and violence. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2004). Race and perceptions of police misconduct. Social Problems, 51, 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, M., Kim, H. K., & Capaldi, D. M. (2005). Developmental trajectories of offending: Validation and prediction to young adult alcohol use, drug use, and depressive symptoms. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (1989). Reducing the disproportionately high frequency of disciplinary actions against minority students: an assessment-based approach. Equity and Excellence, 24, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). The police and neighbourhood safety. Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Estefanía Estévez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Estévez, E., Emler, N.P. A Structural Modelling Approach to Predict Adolescent Offending Behaviour from Family, School and Community Factors. Eur J Crim Policy Res 16, 207–220 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-010-9128-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-010-9128-5

Keywords

Navigation