Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the Demotivating Beliefs Inventory and Test of the Cognitive Triad of Amotivation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent cognitive models of negative symptoms in psychosis posit that amotivation relevant beliefs are reflected in the cognitive triad of negative beliefs concerning the self, others and the future. The aim of this study was to test the proposed three-factor structure of putative ‘demotivating beliefs’ and to ascertain the strength of their association with self-reported amotivation. We combined existing scales assessing ‘demotivating beliefs’ to the Demotivating Beliefs Inventory. This scale was used for exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses as well as latent regression analyses with amotivation in two independent community (n1 = 98; n2 = 347) and one clinical sample (n = 36). We found a three-factor structure with satisfying model fit (‘selfdefeating beliefs’, ‘social indifference beliefs’ and ‘low-expectancy-of-pleasure beliefs’). Each factor showed moderate associations with amotivation (β-coefficients from 0.34 to 0.43; R2 = .30). Our results support the validity of the cognitive triad and its benefit as a framework to analyze demotivating beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We note that different terms such as “dysfunctional”, “irrational” or “maladaptive” have been used to describe people’s appraisals, thoughts, beliefs or attitudes in the field of psychopathology. However, classifying beliefs as dysfunctional may not meet the potential functional aspects of beliefs from a patient’s perspective (Westermann et al., in press). Here, we have decided to use the more neutral term “demotivating beliefs” (i.e. beliefs with negative content that are related to amotivation).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Denise Fischer for her support in recruiting participants, Maik Erdas for his support in the item translation process and Esther Wolfram for her language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Pillny.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Matthias Pillny, Katarina Krkovic and Tania M. Lincoln declare that they have no conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations within 3 years of beginning the work submitted that could inappropriately influence, or be perceived to influence, their work.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 28 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pillny, M., Krkovic, K. & Lincoln, T.M. Development of the Demotivating Beliefs Inventory and Test of the Cognitive Triad of Amotivation. Cogn Ther Res 42, 867–877 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9940-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9940-7

Keywords

Navigation