Skip to main content
Log in

Rumination Moderates the Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification of Attention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whereas research on cognitive bias modification of attention has produced promising results, it remains unclear how and for whom such techniques may be most effectively implemented. This study examined how trait rumination moderated the effects of two attention training tasks on biased attention, assessed via eye tracking, and subsequent stress reactivity. Using a modified dot-probe task, participants were trained to develop a negative attention bias, a positive attention bias, or no attention bias. Though neither the train-negative nor the train-positive conditions produced significant main effects on attention biases or emotional reactivity, rumination was found to moderate training efficacy, such that train-positive participants reporting high levels of rumination demonstrated greater early-stage positive attention biases at post-training, as compared to controls. Further, train-negative and train-positive participants who reported low levels of rumination demonstrated greater positive affect following an acute stressor as compared to controls. Theoretical and clinical implications of results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For information on specific stimuli used in the attention training task and/or in the assessment of attention biases, please contact the first author, Kimberly A. Arditte, at karditte@psy.miami.edu.

  2. Though a systematic examination of the moderating effects of depression and social anxiety symptoms were beyond the scope of this paper, analyses were conducted to ensure that the reported moderation effects were not driven by either of these related constructs. To do this, zero-order correlations were used to examine the relation between self-reported depression (Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition; Beck et al. 1996) and social anxiety (Social Interaction Anxiety Scale; Mattick and Clarke 1998) symptoms and all outcome variables. Depression was significantly associated with post-training FC for positive stimuli (r = .24, p = .046), but no other pre- or post-training eye tracking indices (all p’s > .10). Social anxiety was not related to any of the eye tracking variables at pre- or post-training (all p’s > .10). In addition, depression was significantly associated with negative affect at baseline (r = .31, p = .002), whereas social anxiety was related to negative affect following the stressor (r = .55, p < .001). No other relations between depression or social anxiety and affect at baseline or stressor were found (all p’s > .10). Where significant relations were found, depression and/or social anxiety were controlled for in moderation analyses. This did not impact any of our original results. Rumination still did not moderate the NAB condition’s effect on subsequent negative affect (β = .03, t [84] = .19, p = .85 and β = .05, t [44] = .27, p = .78 when controlling for depression and social anxiety, respectively), nor did it impact the PAB condition’s effect on FC for positive stimuli at post-training (β = .11, t [56] = .54, p = .59).

References

  • Amir, N., Weber, G., Beard, C., Bomyea, J., & Taylor, C. T. (2008). The effect of a single-session attention modification program on response to a public-speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 860–868. doi:10.1037/a0013445.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B. O. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 704–723. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, T., Olatunji, B. O., Sarawgi, S., & Simmons, C. (2010). Orienting and maintenance of gaze in contamination fear: Biases for disgust and fear cues. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 402–408. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.01.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baert, S., de Raedt, R., Schacht, R., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Attentional bias training in depression: Therapeutic effects depend on depression severity. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 41, 265–274. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard, C., Sawyer, A. T., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Efficacy of attention bias modification using threat and appetitive stimuli: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy, 43, 724–740. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2012.01.002.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Clark, D. A. (1997). An information processing model of anxiety: Automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 49–58. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00069-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caseras, X., Garner, M., Bradley, B. P., & Mogg, K. (2007). Biases in visual orienting to negative and positive scenes in dysphoria: An eye movement study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 491–497. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.116.3.491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure ‘change’: Or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 68–80. doi:10.1037/h0029382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lissnyder, E., Koster, E. H. W., Derakshan, N., & de Raedt, R. (2010). The association between depressive symptoms and executive control impairments in response to emotional and non-emotional information. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 264–280. doi:10.1080/02699930903378354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckenrode, J., Ganzel, B., Henderson, C. R, Jr, Smith, E., Olds, D. L., Powers, J., et al. (2000). Preventing child abuse and neglect with a program of nurse home visitation: The limiting effects of domestic violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 1385–1391. doi:10.1001/jama.284.11.1385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen, M. A., Carson, R. J., & Pishva, R. (2010). Automatic emotional information processing and the cortisol response to acute psychosocial stress. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 71–82. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.1.71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen, M. A., Schwartzman, A. E., Stewart, J., & Walker, C. (2002). Stress and selective attention: The interplay of mood, cortisol levels, and emotional information processing. Psychophysiology, 39, 723–732. doi:10.1017/S0048577202010739.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–26). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallion, L. S., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 940–958. doi:10.1037/a0024355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R. (2009). Goal-directed attentional deployment to emotional faces and individual differences in emotion regulation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann, J. (2010). Inhibition and emotion regulation in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 161–166. doi:10.1177/0963721410370293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joormann, J., Dkane, M., & Gotlib, I. H. (2006). Adaptive and maladaptive components of rumination? Diagnostic specificity and relation to depressive biases. Behavior Therapy, 37, 269–280. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, H., & Amir, N. (2010). Preliminary study of attention training to threat and neutral faces on anxious reactivity to a social stressor in social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 263–271. doi:10.1007/s10608-009-9251-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-6. University of Florida, Gainsville, FL.

  • MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (2012). Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 189–217. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G., & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: Assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional biases. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107–123. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.1.107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455–470. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention. (1999). The international affective picture system (IAPS). Gainsville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2004). Simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance in MLR 2-way interactions. Retrieved from http://www.quantpsy.org/interact/lca2_instructions.pdf.

  • Romens, S. E., & Pollack, S. D. (2012). Emotion regulation predicts attention bias in maltreated children at-risk for depression. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 120–127. doi:10.1111/j.1469.2011.02474.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, M. R., Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 575–594. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, A., Vazquez, C., Marker, C., LeMoult, J., & Joormann, J. (2012). Attentional disengagement predicts stress recovery in depression: An eye-tracking study. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Segerstrom, S. C. (2001). Optimism and attentional bias for negative and positive stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1134–1343. doi:10.1177/01461672012710009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, G. P., & Allen, D. N. (2006). The experience of positive emotion is associated with the automatic processing of positive emotional words. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 150–159. doi:10.1080/17439760600566016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 247–259. doi:10.1023/A:1023910315561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadlinger, H. A., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2011). Fixing our focus: Training attention to regulate emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 75–102. doi:10.1177/1088868310365565.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, T. T., & Beevers, C. G. (2010). Biased attention and dysphoria: Manipulating selective attention reduces subsequent depressive symptoms. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 719–728. doi:10.1080/02699930802652388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, L. K., & Joormann, J. (2012). Is timing everything? Sequential effects of rumination and distraction on interpersonal problem solving. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36, 165–172. doi:10.1007/s10608-010-9330-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly A. Arditte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arditte, K.A., Joormann, J. Rumination Moderates the Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification of Attention. Cogn Ther Res 38, 189–199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9581-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013-9581-9

Keywords

Navigation