Skip to main content
Log in

Geographic ‘Place’ and ‘Community Information’ Preferences

Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People dynamically structure social interactions and activities at various locations in their environments in specialized types of places such as the office, home, coffee shop, museum and school. They also imbue various locations with personal meaning, creating group ‘hangouts’ and personally meaningful ‘places’. Mobile location-aware community systems can potentially utilize the existence of such ‘places’ to support the management of social information and interaction. However, acting effectively on this potential requires an understanding of how: (1) places and place-types relate to people’s desire for place-related awareness of and communication with others; and (2) what information people are willing to provide about themselves to enable place-related communication and awareness. We present here the findings from two qualitative studies, a survey of 509 individuals in New York, and a study of how mobility traces can be used to find people’s important places in an exploration of these questions. These studies highlight how people value and are willing to routinely provide information such as ratings, comments, event records relevant to a place, and when appropriate their location to enable services. They also suggest how place and place-type data could be used in conjunction with other information regarding people and places so that systems can be deployed that respect users’ People-to-People-to-Places data sharing preferences. We conclude with a discussion on how ‘place’ data can best be utilized to enable services when the systems in question are supported by a sophisticated computerized user-community social-geographical model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, A., A. Gujar, B.L. Harrison, K. O’Hara and A. Sellen (1998): A Diary Study of Work-Related Readings. Proceedings of CHI 1998

  • Ashbrook, D. and T. Starner (2002): Learning Significant Locations and Predicting User Movement with GPS. Proceedings of ISWC02

  • Brown B., Sellen A., and K. O’Hara (2000): A Diary Study Of Information Capture in Working Life. Proceedings of CHI 2000

  • Carroll, J. M. and J.M. Rosson (2003): A Trajectory for Community Networks. The Information Society, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 281–406

  • Eagle N., Pentland A. (2006) Reality Mining: Sensing Complex Social Systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10(4): 255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck K., Lynda H. Schneekloth (eds). (1994) Ordering Space: Types in Architecture and Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold

    Google Scholar 

  • Genereux R.L., Ward L.M., Russell J.A. (1983) The Behavioral Component in the Meaning of Places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3: 43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D.J. (2000) The Wireless Internet: Promises and Challenges. Computer 33(7): 36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griswold W. et al. (2003): ActiveCampus – Experiments in Community-Oriented Ubiquitous Computing, Tech. report CS2003–0750, Computer Science and Eng. Dept., Univ. of Calif., San Diego; www-cse.ucsd.edu/∼wgg/papers.html#ubi

  • Harrison, S. and P. Dourish (1996): Re-place-ing Space: The Roles of Place and Space in Collaborative Systems. Proceedings of CSCW 1996

  • Jones Q., Grandhi S.A., Terveen L.G., Whittaker S. (2004) People-to-People-to-Geographical-Places: The P3 Framework for Location-Based Community Systems. Journal Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13(3–4): 202–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y., P. Persson and J. Blom (2005): DeDe: Design and Evaluation of a Context-enhanced Mobile Messaging System. Proceedings of CHI 2005

  • Kramer B., (1995) Classification of Generic Places: Explorations with Implications for Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15: 3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmasse, N. and N. Schmandt (2000): Location-aware Information Delivery with Commotion. In Proc. HUC, pp. 157–171

  • Reuters (1998): Bleep at First Sight: LoveGety. Wired News, www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,12342,00.htm

  • Rieman, J. (1993): The Diary Study: A Workplace-Oriented Research Tool to Guide Laboratory Efforts. Proc. of CHI 1993.

  • Sohn, T., K. Kevin Li, G. Lee, I. Smith, J. Scott and W. Griswold (2005): Place-Its: A Study of Location-Based Reminders on Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2005), Tokyo, Japan, September

  • Terry, M., E.D. Mynatt, K. Ryall, D. Leigh (2002): Social Net: Using Patterns of Physical Proximity Over Time to Infer Shared Interests. Extended Abstracts of the ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002), ACM Press, pp. 816–817

  • Weilenmann, A. H. and P. Leuchovius (2004): I’m Waiting Where We Met Last Time: Exploring Everyday Positioning Practices to Inform Design. In Proc. NordiCH I

  • Wiberg, M. (2004): FolkMusic: A Mobile Peer-to-Peer Entertainment System. Proc. 37th Hawaiian Int’l Conf. System Sciences, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 902–906, IEEE CS Press

  • Zhou, C., D. Frankowski, P. Ludford and L. G. Terveen: (2005a): An Experiment in Discovering Personally Meaningful Places from Location Data, Extended Abstracts. Proceedings of CHI 2005

  • Zhou C., Ludford P., Frankowski D., Terveen L. G. (2005b) How Do People’s Concepts of Place Relate to Physical Locations? Interact 2005: 886–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C., Frankowski D., Ludford P., Shekhar S., Terveen L. G. (2004) Discovering Personal Gazetteers: An Interactive Clustering Approach. GIS 2004: 266–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based on work supported by the United States National Science Foundation under Grant Numbers DST 0308018 and DST 0307459 and IIS 0534520. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Quentin Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, Q., Grandhi, S.A., Karam, S. et al. Geographic ‘Place’ and ‘Community Information’ Preferences. Comput Supported Coop Work 17, 137–167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9038-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-007-9038-3

Keywords

Navigation