Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reducing uncertainty in conceptual prior models of complex geologic systems via integration of flow response data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major source of uncertainty in subsurface flow modeling is related to the conceptual model of geologic continuity that is adopted by geologists and hydrogeologists. Traditional model calibration methods usually rely on a given model of geologic continuity that is used to constrain the spatial distribution of aquifer properties. Flow response data, however, may also be used as additional source of information to constrain and revise conceptual geologic models or parameters that control them. The problem is more complicated when models that exhibit complex non-Gaussian spatial connectivity patterns are considered. We formulate the problem of flow data integration to select conceptual geologic scenarios with complex lithofacies as a regularized least-squares problem. The solution approach combines learning with model selection regularization techniques, where the former imposes geological feasibility while the latter eliminates scenarios that do not contribute to reproducing the flow response data. Geologic feasibility constraint to preserve complex connectivity patterns is enforced through supervised machine learning while geologic scenario selection is implemented via a mixed l1/l2-norm regularization term. The least-squares minimization is performed using an alternating directions algorithm that involves a sequence of model selection steps followed by geologic feasibility mapping, the latter implemented by combining k nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm with a pattern-learning method. Several examples with complex fluvial channel models are used to illustrate the performance of this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill, M.C., Tiedeman, C.R.: Effective groundwater model calibration: with analysis of data, sensitivities, predictions, and uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons (2006)

  2. Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Liu, N.: Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching. Cambridge University Press (2008)

  3. Feyen, L., Caers, J.: Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multi-modal heterogeneous formations. Adv. Water Resour.29(6), 912–929 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khodabakhshi, M., Jafarpour, B.: A Bayesian mixture-modeling approach for flow-conditioned multiple-point statistical facies simulation from uncertain training images. Water Resour. Res.49(1), 328–342 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riva, M., Panzeri, M., Guadagnini, A., Neuman, S.P.: Role of model selection criteria in geostatistical inverse estimation of statistical data-and model-parameters. Water Resour. Res.47(7), (2011)

  6. Alcolea, A., Renard, P.: Blocking moving window algorithm: conditioning multiple-point simulations to hydrogeological data. Water Resour. Res. 46, W08511 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caers, J., Hoffman, T.: The probability perturbation method: a new look at Bayesian inverse modeling. Math. Geol.38(1), 81–100 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Comunian, A., Giudici, M.: Hybrid inversion method to estimate hydraulic transmissivity by combining multiple-point statistics and a direct inversion method. Math. Geosci. 50, 147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-018-9727-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Golmohammadi, A., Khaninezhad, M.R.M., Jafarpour, B.: Pattern-based calibration of complex subsurface flow models against dynamic response data. Adv. Water Resour. (2018)

  10. Hansen, T.M., Cordua, K.S., Mosegaard, K.: Inverse problems with non-trivial priors: efficient solution through sequential Gibbs sampling. Comput. Geosci. 1–19 (2012)

  11. Jafarpour, B., Khodabakhshi, M.: A probability conditioning method (PCM) for nonlinear flow data integration into multipoint statistical facies simulation. Math. Geosci.43(2), 133–164 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laloy, E., Linde, N., Jacques, D., Mariethoz, G.: Merging parallel tempering with sequential geostatistical resampling for improved posterior exploration of high-dimensional subsurface categorical fields. Adv. Water Resour., ISSN: 0309-1708. 90, 57–69 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laloy, E., Hérault, R., Lee, J., Jacques, D., Linde, N.: Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural network. Water Resour. Res. 54, 381–406 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, L., Srinivasan, S., Zhoua, H., Gómez-Hernández, J.J.: A pilot point guided pattern matching approach to integrate dynamic data into geological modeling Advances in Water Resources. In: Volume, vol. 62, pp. 125–138. Pages, Part A (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li, L., Srinivasan, S., Zhou, H. et al. Math Geosci (2014) Simultaneous estimation of geologic and reservoir state variables within an ensemble-based multiple-point statistic framework, 46: 597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9504-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, L., Zhou, H., Hendricks Franssen, H.J., Gómez-Hernández, J.J.: Groundwater flow inverse modeling in non-MultiGaussian media: performance assessment of the normal-score Ensemble Kalman Filter. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16, 573–590 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-573-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lochbühler, T., Pirot, G., Straubhaar, J., et al.: Conditioning of multiple-point statistics facies simulations to tomographic images. Math. Geosci. 46, 625 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mariethoz, G., Renard, P., Caers, J.: Bayesian inverse problem and optimization with iterative spatial resampling. Water Resour. Res. 46(11), (2010)

  19. Zhou, H., Gómez-Hernández, J.J., Li, L.: A pattern-search-based inverse method. Water Resour. Res. 48, W03505 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golmohammadi, A., Jafarpour, B.: Simultaneous geologic scenario identification and flow model calibration with group-sparsity formulations. Adv. Water Resour.92, 208–227 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jafarpour, B., Tarrahi, M.: Assessing the performance of the ensemble Kalman filter for subsurface flow data integration under variogram uncertainty. Water Resour. Res.47(5), (2011)

  22. Khaninezhad, M.M., Jafarpour, B.: Prior model identification during subsurface flow data integration with adaptive sparse representation techniques. Comput. Geosci.18(1), 3–16 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rousset, M. A. H., Durlofsky, L. J. (2014). Optimization-based framework for geological scenario determination using parameterized training images. In ECMOR XIV-14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.

  24. Suzuki, S., Caers, J.: A distance-based prior model parameterization for constraining solutions of spatial inverse problems. Math. Geosci.40(4), 445–469 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park, H., Scheidt, C., Fenwick, D., Boucher, A., Caers, J.: History matching and uncertainty quantification of facies models with multiple geological interpretations. Comput. Geosci.17(4), 609–621 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn.53(4), 343–367 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eldar, Y.C., Kuppinger, P., Bolcskei, H.: Block-sparse signals: uncertainty relations and efficient recovery. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.58(6), 3042–3054 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenatton, R., Obozinski, G., Bach, F.: Structured sparse principal component analysis. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and. Statistics. 366–373 (2010)

  29. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal component analysis and factor analysis. In: Principal component analysis, pp. 115–128. Springer, New York, NY (1986)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Boyd, B., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., Eckstein, J. (2011). Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers, Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning: Vol. 3: No. 1, pp 1-122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, J., Zhang, Y.: Alternating direction algorithms for ℓ1-problems in compressive sensing. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33(1), 250–278, 2011 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work in this paper is supported, in part, by the Energi Simulation Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA, USA

    Azarang Golmohammadi & Behnam Jafarpour

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA, USA

    Behnam Jafarpour

  3. Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, HED 313, 925 Bloom Walk, Los Angeles, CA, 90089-1211, USA

    Behnam Jafarpour

Authors
  1. Azarang Golmohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Behnam Jafarpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behnam Jafarpour.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golmohammadi, A., Jafarpour, B. Reducing uncertainty in conceptual prior models of complex geologic systems via integration of flow response data. Comput Geosci 24, 161–180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09908-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-019-09908-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation