Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preliminary data suggests genetic distinctiveness of gyr and saker falcons

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inadequately controlled trade in gyr and saker falcons has lead to saker falcons becoming endangered and both species being CITES listed. However, the phylogenetic relationship between these nominal species is unresolved preventing their molecular identification and limiting the availability of data for conservation management. This study amplified DNA from the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene and nine nuclear microsatellite markers to highlight previously unobserved genetic differences between these two putative species. Results show that gyr and saker are paraphyletic using COI and therefore indistinguishable using this marker. However, the microsatellite allele frequency differences suggest that it is possible to assign an unidentified bird to its correct species with 98% accuracy. The results suggest the two species should be monitored separately to ensure short term conservation success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Arguedas N, Parker PG (2000) Seasonal migration and genetic population structure in house wrens. Condor 102:517–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastham CP, Nicholls MK (2005) Morphometric analysis of large Falco species and their hybrids with implications for conservation. J Rap Res 39:386–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Ann Rev Eco Evol Syst 34:397–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lon B 270:313–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLOS 2: 1657–1663

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt GM (1996) Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and there role in divergence and speciation. Bio J Linn Soc 58:247–276

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2006) International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Red List of threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org Cited 15 Nov 2006

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis. Arizona State University, Tempe Arizona USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller CR, Adams JR, Waits L (2003) Pedigree-based assignment tests for reversing coyote (Canis latrans) introgression into the wild red wolf. Mol Ecol 12:3287–3301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘evolutionary significant units’ for conservation. TREE 9:373–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Nittinger F, Haring E, Pinsker W, Wink M, Gamauf A (2005) Out of Africa? Phylogenetic relationships between Falco biarmicus and the other hierofalcons (Aves: Falconidae). J Zool Syst Evol Res 43:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden R, Shuttleworth C, McEwing R, Cesarini S (2005) Genetic management of the red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris: a practical approach to regional conservation. Con Genet 6:511–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Heredity 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez-Dominguez E, Paetkau D, Tucker N, Hinten G, Moritz C (2001) Resolution of natural groups using iterative assignment tests: an example from two species of Australian native rats (Rattus). Mol Ecol 10:2069–2078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:1847–1857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werle E, Schneider C, Renner M, Volker M, Fiehn W (1994) Convenient single-step, one tube purification of PCR product for direct sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4354–4355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wink M, Sauer-Gürth H, Ellis D, Kenward R (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in the Hierofalco complex (Saker-, Gyr-, Lanner-, Lagger Falcon). In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg BU (eds) Raptors worldwide. WWGBP/MME, Budapest/Berlin, pp 499–504

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). Nick Dawnay received funding from the European Social Fund. We would like to thank the following people for providing samples: Nick Fox (International Wildlife Consultants, UK) and Johan Ekenstedt (Projekt Jaktfalk). This project is grateful for advice from Nick Williams (DEFRA) and Prof Mike Bruford (Cardiff University). We also acknowledge the technical help of Helen Briggs, Liz Heap (WDNAS) and Jon Wetton (Forensic Science Service) for providing us with unpublished microsatellite sequence data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Dawnay.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawnay, N., McEwing, R., Thorpe, R.S. et al. Preliminary data suggests genetic distinctiveness of gyr and saker falcons. Conserv Genet 9, 703–707 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9392-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9392-1

Keywords

Navigation