Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abundance, genetic diversity and conservation of Louisiana black bears (Ursus americanus luteolus) as detected through noninvasive sampling

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the Louisiana black bear (Ursus americanus luteolus) is currently listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, there have been no attempts to estimate range-wide abundance. This subspecies was thought to occupy a near contiguous range across southern Mississippi, Louisiana and east Texas but is now restricted to three isolated areas in Louisiana. In 1964, Louisiana initiated a restocking program in which black bears from Minnesota were introduced into two of these areas. It is not clear how the additions affected population structure or if substantial breeding occurred between native and introduced bears. Using baited sites to snare hair samples, and microsatellite DNA analysis to distinguish individuals, we estimated abundance of two geographically isolated bear populations in south central Louisiana: Inland and Coastal. Additionally, we examined genetic variation both within and between the two populations. Mark recapture analysis of the distribution of individual captures during two primary sampling periods resulted in population estimates of 77 ± 9 for Coastal and 41 ± 6 for Inland. Genetic analysis revealed significant population differentiation (F ST = 0.206) between the two populations. The apparently smaller Inland population exhibited more diversity than the Coastal, which suggests that the genetic structure of the Inland population has been influenced by the reintroduction. Both of these populations are isolated and face considerable demographic and genetic threats, thus conservation measures to protect both are warranted. However, the Coastal population is more representative of Louisiana black bears prior to reintroduction and special consideration should be given to insure its integrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • FW Allendorf (1986) ArticleTitleGenetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity Zoo Bio. 5 181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary Allendorf FW RF Leary (1986) Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals. In: The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding (ed. Thornhill NW) The University of Chicago Press Chicago 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • M Boersen Clark JD King TL (2003) ArticleTitleEstimating black bear population density and genetic diversity at Tensas River Louisiana using microsatellite DNA markers. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 31 197–207

    Google Scholar 

  • CM Clarke D Immell SK Wasser (2001) ArticleTitleTechnical considerations for hair genotyping methods in black bears West. Workshop Black Bear Res. Manage. 7 24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • PL Clarkson IS Liepins (1994) ArticleTitleGrizzly bear population estimate and characteristics in the Anderson and Horton Rivers Area, Northwest Territories 1987–1989. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 9 213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • WG Cochran (1977) Sampling Techniques EditionNumber3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet J-M Luikart G (1996) ArticleTitleDescription and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data Genetics 144 2001–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • J Craighead D Paetkau HV Reynolds ER Vyse C Strobeck (1995) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite analysis of paternity and reproduction in Arctic grizzly bears J. Heredity 86 255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • M Cronin J Shideler J Hechtel C Strobeck D Paetkau (1999) ArticleTitleGenetic relationships of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Prudhoe Bay Region of Alaska: Inference from microsatellite DNA, mitochondrial DNA and field observations. J.␣Heredity 90 622–628

    Google Scholar 

  • I Csiki Lam C Key A Coulter E Clark JD Pace III RM Smith KG Rhoads DD (2003) ArticleTitleGenetic variation in black bears in Arkansas and Louisiana using microsatellite DNA markers J. Mammal. 84 691–701

    Google Scholar 

  • AE Derocher I Stirling (1995) ArticleTitleEstimation of polar bear population size and survival in western Hudson Bay J. Wildl. Manage. 59 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • P Donnelly (1995) ArticleTitleNonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: Quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability Heredity 75 26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Systems Research Institute (1996–1998) ArcView GIS (Version 3.1). Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.

  • DJ Finney (1948) ArticleTitleThe Fisher-Yates test of significance in 2 × 2 contingency tables Biometrika 35 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Foran S Minta C Heinemeyer KS (1997) ArticleTitleDNA-based analysis of hair to identify species and individuals for population research and monitoring Wildl. Soc. Bul. 25 840–847

    Google Scholar 

  • R Frankham (1995) ArticleTitleInbreeding and extinction: A threshold effect Conserv. Biol. 99 792–799

    Google Scholar 

  • P Gagneux C Boesch DS Woodruff (1997) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair Mol. Ecol. 6 861–868

    Google Scholar 

  • DL Garshelis LG Visser (1997) ArticleTitleEnumerating megapopulations of wild bears with an ingested biomarker J. Wildl. Manage. 59 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • B Goossens LP Waits P Taberlet (1998) ArticleTitlePlucked hair samples as a source of DNA: Reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping Mol. Ecol. 7 1237–1241

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2000) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.1). Updated from Goudet 1995.

  • SM Haig (1998) ArticleTitleMolecular contributions to conservation Ecology 79 413–426

    Google Scholar 

  • S Hartley RM III Pace JB Johnston M Swan CP O’Neal L Handley L Smith (2000) A Gap analysis of Louisiana. p.␣558. US Geological Survey Lafayette LA

    Google Scholar 

  • EC Hellgren MR Vaughn (1989) ArticleTitleDemographic analysis of a black bear population in the Great Dismal Swamp J. Wildl. Manage. 53 969–977

    Google Scholar 

  • CR Hughes DC Queller (1993) ArticleTitleDetection of highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in a species with little allozyme polymorphism Mol. Ecol. 2 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • LF Keller DM Waller (2002) ArticleTitleInbreeding effects in wild populations Trends. Ecol. Evol. 17 230–241

    Google Scholar 

  • E Kitahara Y Isagi Y Ishabashis T Saitoh (2000) ArticleTitlePolymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the Asiatic black bear Ursus thibetanus Mol. Ecol. 9 1661–1686

    Google Scholar 

  • M Kohn F Knauer A Stoffela W Schroder S Pääbo (1995) ArticleTitleConservation genetics of the European brown bear-a study using excremental PCR of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences Mol. Eco. 4 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • GH Lowery (1974) The mammals of Louisiana and its adjacent waters. Louisiana State University Press Baton Rouge Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G Cornuet J-M Allendorf FW (1999) ArticleTitleTemporal changes in allele frequencies provide estimates of population bottleneck size Cons. Biol. 13 523–530

    Google Scholar 

  • NJ Lunn D Paetkau W Calvert S Atkinson M Taylor C Strobeck (2000) ArticleTitleCub adoption by polar bears (Ursus maritimus): Determining relatedness with microsatellite markers J. Zool. Lond. 251 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • RD Mace SC Minta TL Manley KE Aune (1994) ArticleTitleEstimating grizzly bear population size using camera sightings Wildl. Soc. Bull. 22 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  • DS Maehr (1984) ArticleTitleDistribution of black bears in eastern North America East Workshop Black Bear Res. and Manage. 7 74–76

    Google Scholar 

  • GW McDaniel KS McKelvey JR Squires LF Ruggiero (2000) ArticleTitleEfficacy of lures and hair snares to detect lynx Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28 119–123

    Google Scholar 

  • CH Merriam (1893) ArticleTitleThe yellow bear of Louisiana Ursus luteolus Griffith. Proc. Biol. Soc.Washington. 8 147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • DA Miller EM Hallerman MR Vaughn JW Kasbohm (1998) ArticleTitleGenetic variation in black bear populations from Louisiana and Arkansas: Examining the potential influence of reintroductions from Minnesota Ursus 10 335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • LS Mills JJ Citta KP Lair MK Schwartz DA Tallmon (2000) ArticleTitleEstimating animal abundance using noninvasive DNA sampling: Promise and pitfalls. Ecol. Appl. 10 283–294

    Google Scholar 

  • JB Mitton (1993) Theory and data pertinent to relationship between heterozygosity and fitness. In: Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. Soule ME) Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • G Mowat C Strobeck (2000) ArticleTitleEstimating population size of␣grizzly bears using hair capture, DNA profiling and mark-recapture analysis. J. Wildl. Manage. 64 183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • WA Neal (1992) ArticleTitleListing the Louisiana black bear as a threatened species and designation of other free-living bears of the species U americanus as threatened due to similarity of appearance. Federal Register 58 588–595

    Google Scholar 

  • M Nei T Maruyama R Chakraborty (1975) ArticleTitleThe bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations Evolution 29 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • RM Nowak (1986) Status of the Louisiana black bear. Office of␣Endangered Species US Fish and Wildlife Service Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • DL Otis KP Burnham GC White DR Anderson (1978) ArticleTitleStatistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations Wildl. Monogr. 62 1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • RM III Pace DR Anderson S Shively (2000) ArticleTitleSources and patterns of mortality in Louisiana black bears Southeastern Assoc. Fish Wildl. Agencies. 54 365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • D Paetkau (2003) ArticleTitleAn empirical exploration of data quality in␣DNA-based population inventories Mol. Ecol. 12 1375–1387

    Google Scholar 

  • D Paetkau W Calvert I Stirling C Strobeck (1995) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears Mol. Ecol. 4 347–354

    Google Scholar 

  • D Paetkau GF Shields C Strobeck (1998) ArticleTitleGene flow between insular coastal and interior populations of brown bears in Alaska. Mol. Ecol. 7 1283–1292

    Google Scholar 

  • D Paetkau C Strobeck (1994) ArticleTitleMicrosatellite analysis of genetic variation in black bear populations Mol. Ecol. 3 489–495

    Google Scholar 

  • D Paetkau C Strobeck (1995) ArticleTitleThe molecular basis and evolutionary history of a microsatellite null allele in bears Mol. Ecol. 4 519–520

    Google Scholar 

  • D Paetkau LP Waits PL Clarkson L Craighead C Strobeck (1997) ArticleTitleAn empirical valuation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations Genetics 147 1943–1957

    Google Scholar 

  • PJ Palsb\’\oll J Allen M Berube PJ Clapham TP Feddersen PS Hammond RR Hudson H Jorgensen S Katona AH Larsen F Larsen J Lien DK Mattila J Sigurjonsson R Sears T Smith R Sponer P Stevick N Oien (1997) ArticleTitleGenetic tagging of humpback whales Nature 388 767–769

    Google Scholar 

  • PG Parker AA Snow MD Schug GC Booton PA Fuerst (1998) ArticleTitleWhat molecules can tell us about a population: Choosing and using a molecular marker Ecology 79 361–382

    Google Scholar 

  • MR. Pelton, 1982, Black bear. In: Wild Mammals of North America eds. Chapman JA Feldhamer GA, pp. 504–514. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland

  • MR Pelton (1989) The Louisiana Black Bear: Status and Future. Special report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service Jackson Mississippi

    Google Scholar 

  • MR Pelton (1990) ArticleTitleBlack bears in the southeast: To list or not␣to list East Workshop Black Bear Res. Manage. 10 155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • KH Pollock JD Nichols C Brownie JE Hines (1990) ArticleTitleStatistical-inference for capture-recapture experiments Wildl. Monogr. 107 1–97

    Google Scholar 

  • JK Pritchard M Stephens P Donnelly (2000) ArticleTitleInference of population structure using multilocus genotype data Genetics 155 945–959

    Google Scholar 

  • DC Queller JE Strassman CR Hughes (1993) ArticleTitleMicrosatellites and kinship Trends Ecol. Evol. 8 285–288

    Google Scholar 

  • M Raymond F Rousset (1995) ArticleTitleGENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism J. Heredity 86 248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (1990) SAS User’s Guide: version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc. Cary North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • A Schenk KM Kovacs (1996) ArticleTitleGenetic variation in a population of black bears as revealed by DNA fingerprinting J. Mammal. 77 942–950

    Google Scholar 

  • A Schenk ME Obbard KM. Kovacs (1998) ArticleTitleGenetic relatedness and home-range overlap among female black bears (Ursus americanus) in northern Ontario, Canada Can. J. Zool. 76 1511–1519

    Google Scholar 

  • GAF Seber (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters 2nd edition Charles Griffin London

    Google Scholar 

  • TR Smith MR Pelton (1990) ArticleTitleHome ranges and movements of black bears in a bottomland hardwood forest in Arkansas Int. Conf. Bear Res. Manage. 8 213–218

    Google Scholar 

  • P Taberlet J Bouvet (1992) Bear conservation genetics. Nature 358 197

    Google Scholar 

  • P Taberlet JJ Camarra GE Uhres O Hannotte LP Waits C Dubois-Paganon CT Burke J Bouvet (1997) ArticleTitleNoninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population Mol. Ecol. 6 869–876

    Google Scholar 

  • P Taberlet S Griffin B Goossens S Questiau V Manceau N Escaravage LP Waits J Bouvet (1996) ArticleTitleReliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR Nucl. Acids Res. 24 3189–3194

    Google Scholar 

  • P Taberlet G Luikart (1999) ArticleTitleNon-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68 41–55

    Google Scholar 

  • P Taberlet H Mattock C Dubois-Paganon J Bouvet (1993) ArticleTitleSexing free-ranging brown bears Ursus arctos using hairs found in the field Mol. Ecol. 2 399–403

    Google Scholar 

  • DF Taylor (1971) A Radio-Telemetry Study of the Black Bear (Euarctos americanus) with Notes on its History and Present Status in Louisiana. MS Thesis Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  • DA Triant (2001) Estimating Population Size and Genetic Diversity of Two Populations of Black Bears in South Central Louisiana. MS Thesis Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish Wildlife Service (1995) Louisiana Black Bear Recovery Plan Jackson Mississippi

    Google Scholar 

  • AJ van Noordwijk (1994) The interaction of inbreeding depression and environmental stochasticity in the risk of extinction of small populations. V Loeschcke J Tomiuk SK Jain (Eds) Conservation Genetics Birkhauser Verlag Basel, Switzerland 131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • HW Wagner KM Sefc (1999) Identity 1.0. Center for Applied Genetics University of Agricultural Sciences Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • RO Wagner (1995) Movement Patterns of Black Bears in South Central Louisiana. MS Thesis Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    Google Scholar 

  • JL Waits PL Leberg (2000) ArticleTitleBiases associated with population estimation using molecular tagging Anim. Conserv. 3 191–199

    Google Scholar 

  • J Warrillow M Culver E Hallerman M Vaughn (2001) ArticleTitleSubspecific affinity of black bears in the White River National Wildlife Refuge J. Heredity 92 226–233

    Google Scholar 

  • GC White DR Anderson KP Burnham DL Otis (1982) Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory LA-8787-NERP Los Alamos, New Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • JB Wooding JR Cox MR Pelton (1994) ArticleTitleDistribution of black bears in the southeastern coastal plain Proc. Annu. Conf. of the Southeast. Assoc. of Fish and Wildl. Agencies. 48 270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • JG Woods D Paetkau D Lewis BN McLellan M Proctor C Strobeck (1999) ArticleTitleGenetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27 616–627

    Google Scholar 

  • S Wright (1943) ArticleTitleIsolation by distance Genetics 28 114–138

    Google Scholar 

  • S Wright (1965) ArticleTitleThe interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating Evolution 19 395–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu R Zeng Z-B (2001) ArticleTitleJoint linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping in natural populations Genetics 157 899–909

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah A. Triant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Triant, D.A., Pace, R.M. & Stine, M. Abundance, genetic diversity and conservation of Louisiana black bears (Ursus americanus luteolus) as detected through noninvasive sampling. Conserv Genet 5, 647–659 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-004-1861-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-004-1861-1

Keywords

Navigation