Abstract
Carbon markets, like other commodity markets, are volatile. They react to stochastic “disequilibrium” spot prices, which may be affected by inadequate policies, speculations and bubbles. The market-based emission trading, therefore, does not necessarily minimize abatement costs and achieve emission reduction goals. We introduce a basic stochastic model integrating emissions reduction, monitoring and trading costs allowing us to analyze the robustness of emission and uncertainty reduction policies under environmental safety constraints asymmetric information and other multiple anthropogenic and natural uncertainties. Explicit treatment of uncertainties provides incentives for reducing them before trading. We illustrate functioning of the robust market with numerical results involving such countries as the US, Australia, Canada, Japan, EU27, Russia, Ukraine. In particular, we analyze if the knowledge about uncertainties may affect portfolios of technological and trade policies or structure of the market and how uncertainty characteristics may affect market prices and change the market structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amann M (2009) Integrated assessment tools: the greenhouse and air pollution interactions and synergies (GAINS) model. Pollut Atmosph Special Issue 73–76
Baumol W, Oates W (1975) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Sydney
Betz R, Sato M (2006) Emissions trading: lessons learnt from the 1st phase of the EU ETS and prospects for the 2nd phase. Clim Pol 6:351–359
Dales JH (1968) Pollution property and prices: an essena in policy-making and economics. University of Toronto Press
De Jong C, Walet K (eds) (2004) A guide for emission trading: risk management and business implications. Risk Books, London
Ermoliev Y, von Winterfeldt D (2012) Systemic risk and security management. In: Ermoliev Y, Makowski M, Marti K (eds) Managing Safety of heterogeneous systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–49
Ermoliev Y, Wets R (eds) (1988) Numerical techniques of stochastic optimization. Computational mathematics. Springer Verlag, Berlin
Ermoliev Y, Michalevich M, Nentjes A (2000) Markets for tradable emission and ambient permits: a dynamic approach. Environ Res Econ 15:39–56
Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y (2005) Catastrophic risk management: flood and seismic risks case studies. In: Wallace SW, Ziemba WT (eds) Applications of stochastic programming. MPS-SIAM Series on Optimization, Philadelphia
Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y, Fischer G, Jonas M, Makowski M (2010a) Cost effective and environmentally safe emission trading under uncertainty. In: Marti K, Ermoliev Y, Makowski M (eds) Coping with uncertainty: robust solutions. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 79–99
Ermolieva T, Ermoliev Y, Fischer G, Jonas M, Makowski M, Wagner F (2010b) Carbon emission trading and carbon taxes under uncertainties. Clim Chang 103(1–2)
Evstigneev I, Flam S (2001) Sharing nonconvex cost. J Glob Optim 20:257–271
Gillenwater M, Sussman F, Cohen J (2007) Practical policy applications of uncertainty analysis for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Lieberman D, Jonas J, Nahorski Z, Nilson S (eds) Accounting for climate change: uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories–verification, compliance, and trading. Springer Verlag
Godal O, Ermoliev Y, Klassen G, Obersteiner M (2003) Carbon trading with imperfectly observable emissions. Environ Res Econ 25:151–169
IPCC (2000) Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Hayama
Kerr S (ed) (2000) Global emissions trading: key issues for industrialized countries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, US
Lieberman D, Jonas M, Nahorski Z, Nilsson S (2007) Accounting for climate change: uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories―verification, compliance, and trading. Springer Verlag, Berlin
McCain R (2010) Game theory: a nontechnical introduction to the analysis of strategy. World Scientific Publishing, ISBN-13 978-981-4289-65-8
Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Price and advertising signals of product quality. J Polit Econ 94:796–821
Montgomery DW (1972) Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J Public Econ 75:273–291
Nahorski Z, Horabik J, Jonas M (2007) Compliance and emissions trading under the Kyoto protocol: rules for uncertain inventories. In: Lieberman D, Jonas M, Nahorski Z, Nilsson S (eds) Accounting for climate change: uncertainty in greenhouse gas inventories–verification, compliance, and trading. Springer Verlag 119–138
Nahorski Z, Stanczak J, Palka P (2010) Multi-agent approach to simulation of the greenhouse gases emission permits market. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 22–24 September 2010, Lvov, Ukraine, 183–195
Obersteiner M, Ermoliev Y, Gluck M, Jonas M, Nilsson S, Shvidenko A (2000) Avoiding a lemons market by including uncertainty in the Kyoto protocol: same mechanism–improved rules. Interim report IR-00-043. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg
Rockafellar T, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value at risk. J Risk 2(3):21–41
Roos J (2011) EU emissions trading triggered dash for coal. The Breakthrough Institute, http://breakthrougheurope.org/
Stavins R (2010) The problem of the commons: still unsettled after 100 years. Discussion paper RFF DP 10–46. Resources for the Future. Washington DC, www.rff.org
Stikkelman R, Dijkema G, Chappin E (2010) Emissions trading fails to reduce CO2 emissions. Delft University of Technology. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management
Wagner F, Amann M (2009) GAINS contribution to ETMA request #2B-v1, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Wagner F, Amann M, Borken-Kleefeld J, Cofala J, Höglund-Isaksson L, Purohit P, Rafaj P, Schöpp W, Winiwarter W (2012) Sectoral marginal abatement cost curves: implications for mitigation pledges and air pollution co-benefits for Annex I countries. Sustain Sci 7:169–184
Winiwarter W (2007) National greenhouse gas inventories: understanding uncertainties versus potential for improving reliability. Water Air Soil Pollut 7:443–450. doi:10.1007/s11267-006-9117-3
Winiwarter W, Muik B (2010) Statistical dependence in input data of national greenhouse gas inventories: effects on the overall inventory uncertainty. Clim Chang 103:19–36. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9921-7
Winiwarter W, Rypdal K (2001) Assessing the uncertainty associated with national greenhouse gas emission inventories: a case study for Austria. Atmos Environ 35:5425–5440
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments that helped us to improve the manuscript. We also thank Guest Editor Dr. Jean P. Ometto for his suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of a Special Issue on “Third International Workshop on Uncertainty in Greenhouse Gas Inventories” edited by Jean Ometto and Rostyslav Bun.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ermolieva, T., Ermoliev, Y., Jonas, M. et al. Uncertainty, cost-effectiveness and environmental safety of robust carbon trading: integrated approach. Climatic Change 124, 633–646 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0824-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0824-2