Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal and spatial variability of the global water balance

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An analysis of simulated global water-balance components (precipitation [P], actual evapotranspiration [AET], runoff [R], and potential evapotranspiration [PET]) for the past century indicates that P has been the primary driver of variability in R. Additionally, since about 2000, there have been increases in P, AET, R, and PET for most of the globe. The increases in R during 2000 through 2009 have occurred despite unprecedented increases in PET. The increases in R are the result of substantial increases in P during the cool Northern Hemisphere months (i.e. October through March) when PET increases were relatively small; the largest PET increases occurred during the warm Northern Hemisphere months (April through September). Additionally, for the 2000 through 2009 period, the latitudinal distribution of P departures appears to co-vary with the mean P departures from 16 climate model projections of the latitudinal response of P to warming, except in the high latitudes. Finally, changes in water-balance variables appear large from the perspective of departures from the long-term means. However, when put into the context of the magnitudes of the raw water balance variable values, there appears to have been little change in any of the water-balance variables over the past century on a global or hemispheric scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Smith M, Pereira LS, Perrier A (1994) An update for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bull 43:35–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW (2003) Effects of IPCC SRES emissions scenarios on river runoff: a global perspective. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7:619–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai A, Qian T, Trenberth KE, Milliman HD (2009) Changes in continental freshwater discharge from 1948 to 2004. J Climate 22:2773–2792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne KA, Willmott CJ (1996) Global distribution of plant-extractable water capacity of soil. Int J Climatol 16:841–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekstrom M, Jones PD, Fowler HJ, Lenderink G, Buishand TA, Conway D (2007) Regional climate model data used within the SWURVE project 1: projected changes in seasonal patterns and estimation of PET. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1069–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedney N, Cox PM, Betts RA, Boucher O, Huntingford C, Stott PA (2006) Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records. Nature 439:835–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerten D, Rost S, von Bloh W, Lucht W (2008) Causes of change in 20th century global river discharge. Geophys Res Lett 35. doi:10.1029/2008GL035258

  • Gleick PH (2000) Water: the potential consequences of climate variability and change for the water resources of the U.S. The Report of the Water Sector Assessment Team of the National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security, Oakland, California, 151 p

  • Gray ST, McCabe GJ (2010) Combined water balance and tree-ring approaches to understanding the potential hydrologic effects of climate change on the Yellowstone River. Water Resour Res 46:W05513. doi:10.1029/2008WR007650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris I, Jones PD, Osborn TJ, Lister DH (2013) Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations–the CRU TS3.10 dataset. Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.3711

  • Hay LE, McCabe GJ (2010) Hydrologic effects of climate change on the Yukon River basin. Climate Change 100:509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Godderis Y, Probst JL, Guyot JL (2004) Evidence for global runoff increase related to climate warming. Adv Water Resour 27:631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, Mather JR (1992) An evaluation of the average annual global water balance. Geogr Rev 82:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, McCabe GJ (2005) A re-evaluation of the average annual global water balance. Phys Geogr 26:467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legates DR, Lins HF, McCabe GJ (2005) Comments on “Evidence for global runoff increase related to climate warming” by Labat et al. Adv Water Resour 28:1310–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Ayers MA (1989) Hydrologic effects of climate change in the Delaware River basin. Water Resour Bull 25:1231–1242

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Markstrom SL (2007) A monthly water-balance model driven by a graphical user interface. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File report 2007–1088 6 p

  • McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (1999) Future snowpack conditions in the western United States derived from general circulation model climate simulations. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:1473–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (2008) Joint variability of global runoff and global sea-surface temperatures. J Hydrometeorol 9:816–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Wolock D (2011a) Century-scale variability in global annual runoff examined using a water balance model. Int J Climatol 31:1739–1748. doi:10.1002/joc.2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (2011b) Independent effects of temperature and precipitation on modeled runoff in the conterminous United States. Water Resour Res 47. doi:10.1029/2011WR010630

  • Milliman JD, Farnsworth KL, Jones PD, Xu KN, Smith LC (2008) Climatic and anthropogenic factors affecting river discharge to the global ocean, 1951–2000. Global Planet Chang 62:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Dunne KA, Vecchia AV (2005) Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature 438:347–350. doi:10.1038/nature04312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijssen B, O'Donnell GM, Hamlet A, Lettenmaier DP (2000) Hydrologic sensitivity of global rivers to climate change. Clim Change 50:515–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Piao S, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, de Noblet-Ducoudre N, Labat D, Zaehle S (2007) Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:15242–15247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rango A, Martinec J (1995) Revisiting the degree-day method for snowmelt computations. Water Resour Bull 31:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG, Al-Adhami MJ, Bowles DS (1991) A preliminary comparison of snowmelt models for erosion prediction. Proc. 59th Annual Western Snow Conference, Juneau, Alaska, p 79–90

  • Trenberth KE, Dai A, Rasmussen RM, Parsons DB (2003) The changing character of precipitation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 84:1205–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje PG, Bojariu R, Easterling DR, Klein Tank AMG, Parker DE, Rahimzadeh F, Renwick JA, Rusticucci MM, Soden BJ, Zhai P-M (2007) Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, McCabe GJ (1999) Effects of potential climatic change on annual runoff in the conterminous United States. J Am Water Resour Assoc 35:1341–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory J. McCabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCabe, G.J., Wolock, D.M. Temporal and spatial variability of the global water balance. Climatic Change 120, 375–387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0798-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0798-0

Keywords

Navigation