Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘New Estimates of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in China’S Forests: Effects of Age–Class and Method On Inventory-Based Carbon Estimation’

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We developed a volume-to-biomass method based on age groups representative of forest development stages to estimate live tree biomass, C, and biomass and C accumulation rates of China’s forests between 1973 and 1993. The data were from plot-level forest inventory, national-level inventory statistics, and ecological site studies specified to estimate biomass in different tree components. Our results indicate that carbon storage in China’s forests was 4.34 Pg C in the early 1990s, an increase of 13% since the early 1970s. The annual forest C sequestration rate from the late 1980s to early 1990s was 0.068 Pg C/yr and approximately four- to five-times higher than in the 1970s and 1980s. The large C sink in China’s forests in the early 1990s was likely related to age structure changes that had developed to more productive stages, a consequence of reforestation and afforestation programs from the 1960s. The results were compared with other C store estimates, which were based on the same inventory data. Various methods can produce estimates that differ in the direction of C flux as well as its magnitude. Separating age groups with the volume–biomass method could cause a 27% difference in estimated carbon pools but an 89% difference in C sequestration rates whereas the biomass density method would provide an estimate that differs by 65% in the C pools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexeyev, V. A. and Birdsey, R. A.: 1996, Carbon Storage in Forests and Peatlands of Russia, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep/ NE-244, p. 137.

  • Alexeyev, V., Birdsey, R., Stakanov, V., and Korotkov, I.: 1995, ‘Carbon in vegetation of Russian forest: Methods to estimate storage and geographical distribution’, Water, Air, and Soil Pollut. 82, 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apps, M. J., Kurz, W. A., Beukema, S. J., and Bhatti, J. S.: 1999, ‘Carbon budget of Canadian forest product sector’, Environ. Sci. Policy 2, 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birdsey, R. A.: 1992, Carbon Storage and Accumulation in United States Forest Ecosystems, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep/ WO-59, p. 51.

  • Birdsey, R. A., and Heath, L. S.: 1995, ‘Carbon changes in U.S. forests’, in L. A. Joyce (ed.), Productivity of America’s Forest and Climate Change, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep/ RM-GTR-271, pp. 56–70.

  • Birdsey, R. A., and Schrueder, H. T.: 1992, An Overview of Forest Inventory and Analysis Estimation Procedures in the Eastern United States – With an Emphasis on the Components of Change, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep. RM-214, p. 11.

  • Brown, S., Gillespie, A. J. R., and Lugo, A. E.: 1989, ‘Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data’, Forest Sci. 35, 881–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., and Lugo, A. E.: 1984, ‘Biomass of tropical forests: A new estimate based on forest volumes’, Science 223, 1290–1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. L., and Schroeder, P. E.: 1999, ‘Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of wood biomass for eastern U.S. Forests’, Ecol. Appl. 9(3), 968–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Schroeder, P., and Birdsey, R.: 1997, ‘Aboveground biomass distribution of US eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development’, Forest Ecol. Manage. 96, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casperson, J. P., Pacala, S. W., Jenkins, J. C., Hurtt, G. C., Moorcroft, P. R., and Birdsey, R. A.: 2000, ‘Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests’, Science 290, 1148–1151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cost, N. D.: 1990, The Forest Biomass Resources of the United States, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep/ WO-57, p. 21.

  • Delucia, E. H., Hamilton, J. G., Naidu, S. L., Thomas, R. B., Andrews, J. A., Finzi, A., Lavine, M., Matamala, R., Mohan, J. E., Hendrey, G. R., Schlesinger, W. H.: 1999, ‘Net primary production of a forest ecosystem with experimental CO2 enrichment’, Science 284, 1177–1179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, J., Chen, A., Peng, C., Zhao, S., and Chi, L.: 2001, ‘Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998’, Science 292, 2320–2322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, J., Wang, G., Liu, G., and Xu, S.: 1998, ‘Forest biomass of China: An estimate based on the biomass–volume relationship’, Ecol. Appl. 8, 1084–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRSC: 1977, Forest Resource Statistics of China (1973–1976), Chinese Forestry Publishers, Beijing, China.

  • FRSC: 1982, Forest Resource Statistics of China (1977–1981), Chinese Forestry Publishers, Beijing, China.

  • FRSC: 1989, Forest Resource Statistics of China (1984–1988), Chinese Forestry Publishers, Beijing, China.

  • FRSC: 1994, Forest Resource Statistics of China (1989–1993), Chinese Forestry Publishers, Beijing, China.

  • Goodale, C. L., Apps, M. J., Birdsey, R. A., Field, C. B., Heath, L. S., Houghton, R. A., Jenkins, J. C., Kohlmaier, G. H., Kurz, W., Liu, S., Nabuurs, G. J., Nilsson, S., and Shvidenko, A. X.: 2002, ‘Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere’, Ecol. Appl. 12(3), 891–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R. A., Hackler, J. L., and Lawrence, K. T.: 1999, ‘The US carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change’, Science 285, 574–578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC: 2000, Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Jenkins, J. C., Birdsey, R. A., and Pan, Y.: 2001, ‘Potential biomass and NPP estimation for the Mid-Atlantic region (USA) using forest inventory data’, Ecologic. Appl. 11(4), 1174–1193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. C., Chojnacky, D. C., Heath, L. S., and Birdsey, R. A.: 2003, ‘National-scale biomass estimators for United State’s tree species’, Forest Sci. 49(1), 12–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, P. E., Mielikäinen, K., and Kuusela, K.: 1992, ‘Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971–1990’, Science 256, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H., and Whittaker, R. H.: 1975, Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer Verlag, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liski, J., and Kauppi, P.: 2000, ‘Wood biomass and the carbon cycle’, in Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand (Industrialized Temperate/Boreal Countries), UN-ECE/FAO Contributions to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2002, United Nations, New York, pp. 155–171.

  • Luo, T.: 1996, The Distribution Patterns and Modeling of Biomass and Net Primary Production in China Main Forests, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis (Chinese), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, p. 211.

  • McGuire, A. D., Melillo, J. M., and Joyce, L. A.: 1995, ‘The role of nitrogen in the response of forest net primary production to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide’, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 473–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myneni, R. B., Dong, J., Tucker, C. J., Kaufmann, R. K., Kauppi, P. E., Liski, J., Zhou, L., Alexeyev, V., and Hughes, M. K.: 2001, ‘A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests’, PNAS 98, 14784–14789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, S., Shivdenko, A., Stolbovoi, V., Gluck, M., Jonas, M., and Obersteiner, M.: 2000, Full Carbon Account for Russia, IIASI, Laxenburg, Austria, Interim Report IR-00-021.

  • Schimel, D., House, J. I., Hibbard, K. A., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Peylin, P., Braswell, B. H., Apps, M. J., Baker, D., Bondeau, A., Canadell, J., Churkina, G., Cramer, W., Denning, A. S., Field, C. B., Friedlingstein, P., Goodale, C., Heimann, M., Houghton, R. A., Melillo, J. M., Moor, B., Murdiyarso, D., Noble, I., Pacala, S. W., Prentice, I. C., Raupach, M. R., Rayner, P. J., Scholes, R. J., Steffen, W. L., Wirth, C.: 2001, ‘Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems’, Nature 414, 169–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, P., Brown, S., Mo, J., Birdsey, R., and Cieszewski, C.: 1997, ‘Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data’, Forest Sci. 43(3), 424–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki, K. K., Hozumi, Y. K., and Kira, T.: 1964a, ‘A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pine model. I: Basic analysis’, Jap. J. Ecol. 14, 94–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinozaki, K. K., Hozumi, Y. K., and Kira, T.: 1964b, ‘A quantitative analysis of plant form – the pine model theory. II: Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology’, Jap. J. Ecol. 14, 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. E., and Heath, L. S.: 2000, ‘Considerations for interpreting probabilistic estimates of uncertainty of forest carbon’, in L. A. Joyce and R. Birdsey (eds.), The Impact of Climate Change on America’s Forests, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep/ RMRS-GTR-59, pp. 102–111.

  • Smith, J. E., Heath, L. S., and Jenkens, J. C.: 2002, Forest Tree Volume to Biomass Models and stimates for Live and Standing Dead Trees of U.S. Forest, USDA For Serv. Gen Tech. Rep. NE-298, p. 57.

  • Waring, R. H., and Schlesinger, W. H. : 1985, Forest Ecosystems: Concept and Management, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, p. 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X-Q., and Xu, D.: 2003, ‘Potential carbon sequestration in China’s forests’, Environ. Sci. Policy 6, 421–432.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yude Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Luo, T., Birdsey, R. et al. ‘New Estimates of Carbon Storage and Sequestration in China’S Forests: Effects of Age–Class and Method On Inventory-Based Carbon Estimation’. Climatic Change 67, 211–236 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5

Keywords

Navigation