Skip to main content
Log in

Homogeneous and porous modified bacterial cellulose achieved by in situ modification with low amounts of carboxymethyl cellulose

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the rehydration ability of bacterial cellulose (BC), many macromolecules have been used as modifiers in previous reports. However, the aggregation of additives in the BC matrix appears to be inevitable. We investigated different parts of a BC pellicle, which was achieved by in situ modification with carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in culture with Gluconacetobacter xylinus ATCC53582 or Enterobacter sp. FY-07. We observed a concentration gradient of CMC in the BC pellicle from G. xylinus ATCC53582, but not with Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Low concentrations of CMC (0.01 %, m/v) are sufficient to modify BC in situ in culture with Enterobacter sp. FY-07, in which CMC could sufficiently contact with the newly formed BC. The crystallinity of the modified BC decreased by more than 39.8 %, and its rehydration ability and water holding capacity increased by 43.3 and 31.0 %, respectively. Unlike the pellicle of modified BC achieved from obligate aerobes, such as G. xylinus ATCC53582, that produced by Enterobacter sp. FY-07 exhibited better homogeneity and porosity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asako H, Masaki T, Hiroyuki Y, Fumitaka H (1998) In situ crystallization of bacterial cellulose III. Influences of different polymeric additives on the formation of microfibrils as revealed by transmission electron microscopy. Cellulose 5:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Zhang L (2011) Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects. Carbohydr Polym 84:40–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charreau H, Foresti ML, Vazquez A (2013) Nanocellulose patents trends: a comprehensive review on patents on cellulose nanocrystals, microfibrillated and bacterial cellulose. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 7:56–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Cho SY, Jin HJ (2010) Modification and applications of bacterial celluloses in polymer science. Macromol Res 18:309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng KC, Catchmark JM, Demirci A (2011) Effects of CMC addition on bacterial cellulose production in a biofilm reactor and its paper sheets analysis. Biomacromolecules 12:730–736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, Brown RM Jr (2006) Microbial cellulose-the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials 27:145–151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan JM, Gough JE, Eichhorn SJ (2013) Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine (Lond) 8:287–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes SC, Sadocco P, Alonso-Varona A, Palomares T, Eceiza A, Silvestre AJ, Mondragon I, Freire CS (2013) Bioinspired antimicrobial and biocompatible bacterial cellulose membranes obtained by surface functionalization with aminoalkyl groups. Appl Mater Inter 5:3290–3297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habibi Y (2014) Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev. doi:10.1039/C3CS60204D

  • Haigler CH, Brown RM, Benziman M (1980) Calcofluor white ST Alters the in vivo assembly of cellulose microfibrils. Science 21:903–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigler CH, White AR, Brown RM, Cooper KMJ (1982) Alteration of in vivo cellulose ribbon assembly by carboxymethyl cellulose and other cellulose derivatives. Cell Biol 94:64–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong L, Wang YL, Jia SR, Huang Y, Gao C, Wan YZ (2006) Hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose composites synthesized via a biomimetic route. Mater Lett 60:1710–1713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HC, Chen LC, Lin SB, Hsu CP, Chen HH (2010) In situ modification of bacterial cellulose network structure by adding interfering substances during fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101:6084–6091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida T, Mitarai M, Sugano Y (2003) Role of water-soluble polysaccharides in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnol Bioeng 83:474–478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis M (2003) Chemistry: cellulose stacks up. Nature 426:611–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung HI, Jeong JH, Lee OM, Park GT, Kim KK, Park HC, Lee SM, Kim YG, Son HJ (2010a) Influence of glycerol on production and structural-physical properties of cellulose from Acetobacter sp. V6 cultured in shake flasks. Bioresour Technol 101:3602–3608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung HI, Lee OM, Jeong JH, Jeon YD, Park KH, Kim S, An WG, Son HJ (2010b) Production and characterization of cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 using a cost-effective molasses-corn steep liquor medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:486–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keshk S, Sameshima K (2006) The utilization of sugar cane molasses with/without the presence of lignosulfonate for the production of bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:291–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindström T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lam E, Male KB, Chong JH, Leung AC, Luong JH (2012) Applications of functionalized and nanoparticle-modified nanocrystalline cellulose. Trends Biotechnol 30:283–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KY, Bismarck A (2012) Susceptibility of never-dried and freeze-dried bacterial cellulose towards esterification with organic acid. Cellulose 19:891–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linder A, Bergman R, Bodin A, Gatenholm P (2003) Mechanism of assembly of xylan onto cellulose surfaces. Langmuir 19:5072–5077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Zyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol R 66:506–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma T, Ji KH, Wang W, Wang JH, Li ZY, Ran HT, Liu B, Li GQ (2012) Cellulose synthesized by Enterobacter sp. FY-07 under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Bioresour Technol 126:18–23

  • Mondal MIH (2013) Mechanism of structure formation of microbial cellulose during nascent stage. Cellulose 20:1073–1088

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadine H, Dieter K (2009) Alteration of bacterial nanocellulose structure by in situ modification using polyethylene glycol and carbohydrate additives. Cellulose 16:899–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Kim HC, Kim HY, Chung YS, Park WH, Youk JH (2005) Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 340:2376–2391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1277–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AEJ, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokoh C, Takabe K, Fujita M, Saiki H (1998) Cellulose synthesized by Acetobacter xylinum in the presence of acetyl glucomannan. Cellulose 5:249–261

  • Ul-Islam M, Shah N, Ha JH, Park JK (2011) Effect of chitosan penetrationon physico-chemical and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose. Korean J Chem Eng 28:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Kang M, Kim SM, Khan T, Park JK (2013) Effect of post-synthetic processing conditions on structural variations and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 20:253–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wesarg F, Schlott F, Grabow J, Kurland HD, Heßler N, Kralisch D, Müller FA (2012) In situ synthesis of photocatalytically active hybrids consisting of bacterial nanocellulose and anatase nanoparticles. Langmuir 28:13518–13525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Z, Wen F, Gao S, Ang MY, Pallathadka PK, Liu L, Yu H (2010) Preparation of three-dimensional interconnected macroporous cellulosic hydrogels for soft tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31:8141–8152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31170075) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013AA064402).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo Qiang Li.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1450 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, T., Zhao, Q.Q., Ji, K.H. et al. Homogeneous and porous modified bacterial cellulose achieved by in situ modification with low amounts of carboxymethyl cellulose. Cellulose 21, 2637–2646 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0316-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0316-1

Keywords

Navigation