Abstract
Purpose
Previous studies have evaluated intra-study heterogeneities of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but inter-study heterogeneities remain poorly understood. We investigate the heterogeneities of outcomes among control groups of HFpEF trials.
Methods
We included randomized controlled trials recruiting HFpEF patients with ejection fraction ≥ 40% and reporting Kaplan-Meier curves for at least 36 months. The Kaplan-Meier curves of control groups were extracted and calculated for hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Two virtual trials were developed to validate the reliability and accuracy of our method.
Results
Of 4161 studies, we included six trials containing 7682 HFpEF patients in control groups. The DIG trial had the highest all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure mortality, and composite endpoints of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (all p < 0.001). The TOPCAT trial had the lowest all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization (all p < 0.001). Adoption of different ejection fraction cut-off values for HFpEF diagnosis did not significantly change the outcomes of control groups in the DIG trial (45% vs. 50%: hazard ratio, 1.05, 95% confidence interval, 0.97–1.13, p = 0.271), or in the CHARM-Preserved trial (40% vs. 50%: hazard ratio, 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 0.93–1.09, p = 0.864) during 36-month follow-up.
Conclusions
The control groups of HFpEF trials have heterogeneous outcomes. Future trials should consider these heterogeneities when designing protocols.
References
Luo H, Xu Y, Yue F, Zhang C, Chen C. Quality of inclusion criteria in the registered clinical trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: is it time for a change? Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:210–4.
Shah SJ, Katz DH, Selvaraj S, et al. Phenomapping for novel classification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2015;3:269–79.
Zheng SL, Chan FT, Nabeebaccus AA, et al. Drug treatment effects on outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2018;5:407–15.
Wei Y, Royston P. Reconstructing time-to-event data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Stata J. 2017;17:786–802.
Luo H, Zhang C, Liu H. A month-by-month analysis of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;1:2047487318785465.
Ahmed A, Rich MW, Love TE, et al. Digoxin and reduction in mortality and hospitalization in heart failure: a comprehensive post hoc analysis of the dig trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;2:178–86.
Pitt B, Pfeffer MA, Assmann SF, et al. Spironolactone for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. New Engl J Med. 2014;15:1383–92.
Yamamoto K, Origasa H, Hori M. Effects of carvedilol on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the Japanese diastolic heart failure study (J-DHF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2013;1:110–8.
Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved trial. Lancet. 2003;9386:777–81.
Cleland JG, Tendera M, Adamus J, Freemantle N, Polonski L, Taylor J. The perindopril in elderly people with chronic heart failure (PEP-CHF) study. Eur Heart J. 2006;19:2338–45.
Zile MR, Gaasch WH, Anand IS, et al. Mode of death in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction: results from the irbesartan in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction study (I-PRESERVE) trial. Circulation. 2010;12:1393–405.
Abdul-Rahim AH, Shen L, Rush CJ, Jhund PS, Lees KR, McMurray JJV. Effect of digoxin in patients with heart failure and mid-range (borderline) left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;7:1139–45.
Lund LH, Claggett B, Liu J, Lam CS, Jhund PS, Rosano GM, et al. Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction in CHARM: characteristics, outcomes and effect of candesartan across the entire ejection fraction spectrum. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20:1230–9.
Ahmed A, Rich MW, Fleg JL, et al. Effects of digoxin on morbidity and mortality in diastolic heart failure: the ancillary digitalis investigation group trial. Circulation. 2006;5:397–403.
Patel HC, Hayward C, Dungu JN, et al. Assessing the eligibility criteria in phase iii randomized controlled trials of drug therapy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the critical play-off between a “pure” patient phenotype and the generalizability of trial findings. J Card Fail. 2017;7:517–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 21919 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, H., Zhang, C., Wang, J. et al. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Trials Have Heterogeneous Control Groups: a Comparison of Kaplan-Meier Curves. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 32, 577–580 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6827-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6827-5