Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Myocardial wall motion and thickening assessment in early gated SPECT images of acute coronary syndrome patients likely to have inferolateral perfusion defects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare semi-quantitative visual scores of perfusion, motion and thickening with an automated hypoperfusion index (HI) in patients with suspected acute inferolateral perfusion defects. In the absence of perfusion defects motion and thickening abnormalities were assessed. Sixty-eight patients with chest pain at rest and either ST depression ≥0.1 mV in ≥1 of leads I, aVL, V1–V6 on 12-lead ECG or ST elevation ≥0.05 mV in ≥1 posterior lead on the body surface map comprised the study population. A rest gated perfusion scan was performed within 24 h of symptoms. Scans were scored for perfusion, motion and thickening semi-quantitatively. The scores were compared to the automated HI. A 12 h Troponin T >0.09 ng/ml indicated myocardial infarction (MI). Sixty-five patients (96%, 65/68) had MI. The summed perfusion score correlated well with the HI (ρ = 0.90, P < 0.01) and agreement between scorers was good (κ = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.57–0.94). The summed motion score correlated with the HI (ρ = −0.61, P < 0.01) and agreement between scorers was moderate (κ = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.52–0.79). Summed thickening score correlated with HI (ρ = −0.67, P < 0.01) and agreement between scorers was good (κ = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.64–0.88). Of the 1156 segments assessed (68 × 17), 542 had normal perfusion. Of these normally perfused segments, 113 (21%, 113/542) had a motion abnormality and 102 (19%, 102/542) had a thickening abnormality. Three patients with proven myocardial infarction had normal myocardial perfusion (HI ≤ 5) but exhibited wall motion and thickening abnormalities. In conclusion, assessment of wall motion and thickening in addition to perfusion in acute myocardial perfusion imaging may improve the diagnostic sensitivity for acute MI. Of the scores addressing motion and thickening, interobserver agreement was better for the summed thickening score.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varetto T, Cantalupi D, Altieri A, Orlandi C (1993) Emergency room technetium-99 m sestamibi imaging to rule out acute myocardial ischemic events in patients with nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1804–1808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kontos MC, Jesse RL, Schmidt KL, Ornato JP, Tatum JL (1997) Value of acute rest sestamibi perfusion imaging for evaluation of patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:976–982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heller GV, Stowers SA, Hendel RC, Herman SD, Daher E, Ahlberg AW et al (1998) Clinical value of acute rest technetium-99 m tetrofosmin tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with acute chest pain and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1011–1017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, Feldman JA, Griffith JL, Heller GV et al (2002) Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischaemia: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 288:2693–2700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bilodeau L, Theroux P, Gregoire J, Gagnon D, Arsenault A (1991) Technetium-99 m sestamibi tomography in patients with spontaneous chest pain: correlations with clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:1684–1691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeroudi MO, Cheirif J, Habib G, Bolli R (1994) Prolonged wall motion abnormalities after chest pain at rest in patients with unstable angina: a possible manifestation of myocardial stunning. Am Heart J 127:1241–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerber BL, Wijns W, Vanoverschelde JL, Heyndrickx GR, De Bruyne B, Bartunek J et al (1999) Myocardial perfusion and oxygen consumption in reperfused noninfarcted dysfunctional myocardium after unstable angina: direct evidence for myocardial stunning in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1939–1946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Owens C, McClelland A, Walsh S, Smith B, Adgey J (2008) Comparison of value of leads from body surface maps to 12-lead electrocardiogram for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 102:257–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee (2000) Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 21:1502–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benoit T, Vivegnis D, Foulon J, Rigo P (1996) Quantitative evaluation of myocardial single-photon emission tomographic imaging: application to the measurement of perfusion defect size and severity. Eur J Nucl Med 23:1603–1612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith WH, Kastner RJ, Calnon DA, Segalla D, Beller GA, Watson DD (1997) Quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography imaging: a counts-based method for display and measurement of regional and global ventricular systolic function. J Nucl Cardiol 4:451–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcassa C, Marzullo P, Parodi O, Sambuceti G, L’Abbate A (1990) A new method for noninvasive quantification of segmental myocardial wall thickening using technetium-99 m sestamibi 2-methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile scintigraphy—results in normal subjects. J Nucl Med 31:173–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flaschkampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA et al (2005) American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1440–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Christian TF, Clements IP, Gibbons RJ (1991) Non invasive identification of myocardium at risk in patients with acute myocardial infarction and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms with Technetium-99 m-sestamibi. Circulation 83:1615–1620

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico A, Friedman J et al (1996) Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease. Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 93:905–914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was completed with the assistance of Mrs B Smith SRN, Miss A Tomlin SN, and Mrs Helen Long MSC BSE Chief Cardiac Physiologist and her department. This work was supported by a research grant from the British Heart Foundation [Grant number: PG/04/105/17734].

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanne Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neill, J., Harbinson, M. & Adgey, J. Myocardial wall motion and thickening assessment in early gated SPECT images of acute coronary syndrome patients likely to have inferolateral perfusion defects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26, 881–891 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9641-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9641-0

Keywords

Navigation