Skip to main content
Log in

Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With increasing clinical use of cardiac CT imaging it is important that all health care providers referring for or administering such examinations are familiar with the concepts and values of radiation dosimetry in CT as well as with the basic principles of radiation protection. There are important technical differences pertinent to radiation dose between the CT scanner types that are currently being used for imaging of the heart and coronary arteries. As a result of these differences, the radiation dose typically is higher when a cardiac examination is performed with multidetector-row CT (MDCT) than when it is performed with electron beam CT. Several techniques have been described to reduce radiation dose of MDCT imaging by varying the X-ray tube current during a CT examination. The volume computed tomographic dose index (CTDIvol), the dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (E) are the most useful parameters to describe and compare radiation doses received from cardiac CT examinations. When comparing radiation doses between scanning protocols and scanner types, the degree of image noise must be considered. Diagnostic, rather than aesthetic, quality of images should be the most important factor guiding the development of scanning protocols for cardiac CT imaging. Cardiac CT examinations should be ordered only by qualified health care providers, and the ordering clinicians should be aware of their responsibility of weighing risks of the radiation exposure against the expected benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. TC Gerber RS Kuzo N Karstaedt GE Lane RL Morin PF Sheedy RE Safford JL Blackshear JH Pietan (2002) ArticleTitleCurrent results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 77 55–71 Occurrence Handle11794459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D Ropers S Ulzheimer E Wenkel U Baum T Giesler H Derlien W Moshage WA Bautz WG Daniel WA Kalender S Achenbach (2001) ArticleTitleInvestigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88 792–795 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01855-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrktlCnsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11589852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AR Deibler RS Kuzo M Vöhringer EE Page RE Safford JN Patton GE Lane RL Morin TC Gerber (2004) ArticleTitleImaging of congenital coronary anomalies with multislice spiral computed tomography. Mayo Clin Proc 79 1017–1023 Occurrence Handle15301329 Occurrence Handle10.4065/79.8.1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. RL Morin TC Gerber CH McCollough (2003) ArticleTitleRadiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107 917–922 Occurrence Handle12591765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. A Berrington de Gonzalez S Darby (2004) ArticleTitleRisk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363 345–351 Occurrence Handle15070562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. TF Jakobs CR Becker B Ohnesorge T Flohr C Suess UJ Schoepf MF Reiser (2002) ArticleTitleMultislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12 1081–1086 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00330-001-1278-x Occurrence Handle11976849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P Hunold FM Vogt A Schmermund JF Debatin G Kerkhoff T Budde R Erbel K Ewen J Barkhausen (2003) ArticleTitleRadiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multi-detector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226 145–52 Occurrence Handle12511683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. T Trabold M Buchgeister A Kuttner M Heuschmid AF Kopp S Schroder CD Claussen (2003) ArticleTitleEstimation of radiation exposure in 16-detector row computed tomography of the heart with retrospective ECG-gating. ROFO-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden V 175 1051–1055 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3szltlyksw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. CH McCollough FE Zink (1999) ArticleTitlePerformance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys 26 2223–2230 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.598777 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Flt1Crtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10587202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DP Boyd MJ Lipton (1983) ArticleTitleCardiac computed tomography. Proc IEEE 71 298–307 Occurrence Handle10.1109/PROC.1983.12588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. CH McCollough FE Zink RL Morin (1994) ArticleTitleRadiation dosimetry for electron beam CT. Radiology 192 637–643 Occurrence Handle8058927 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2czjs1yltQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. GE Healthcare. Computed tomography: E-speed. Available at: http://www.gemedicalsystemseurope.com/euen/rad/ct/products/espeed.html. Accessed June 28, 2004.

  13. Siemens Medical Systems. Shifting Paradigms in CT. Available at: http://www.medical.siemens.com/siemens/en_US/rg_marcom_FBAs/files/brochures/magazi_medical_ solutions/science/Science_Artikel_Speed4D.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2004.

  14. TB Shope RM Gagne GC Johnson (1981) ArticleTitleA method for describing the doses delivered by transmission X-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 8 488–495 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.594995 Occurrence Handle7322067 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL3MXks12lt7k%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. JR Cameron D Zimmerman G Kenney R Buch R Bland R Grant (1964) ArticleTitleThermoluminescent radiation dosimetry utilizing LiF. Health Phys 10 25–29 Occurrence Handle14100860 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaF2cXltVGjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004032-196401000-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A Suzuki MN Suzuki (1978) ArticleTitleUse of a pencil-shaped ionization chamber for measurement of exposure resulting from a computed tomography scan. Med Phys 5 536–539 Occurrence Handle732777 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FptlGksg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. W Pavlicek J Horton R Turco (1979) ArticleTitleEvaluation of the MDH Industries, Inc. pencil chamber for direct beam CT measurements. Health Phys 37 773–774 Occurrence Handle544564 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c7otFOltQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. RA Jucius GX Kambic (1980) ArticleTitleMeasurements of computed tomography X-ray fields utilizing the partial volume effect. Med Phys 7 379–382 Occurrence Handle7393165 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c3jt1altA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/mainindex.htm. Accessed June 28, 2004.

  20. InstitutionalAuthorNameInternational Electrotechnical Commission. (2002) Medical Electrical Equipment. Part 2-44: Particular Requirements for the Safety of X-ray Equipment for Computed Tomography. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Central Office Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  21. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991; 21: 1–201.

    Google Scholar 

  22. CH McCollough BA Schueler (2000) ArticleTitleCalculation of effective dose. Med Phys 27 828–837 Occurrence Handle10841384 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvlvFyktw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. RL Morin (1988) Monte Carlo Simulation in the Radiological Sciences. CRC Press Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  24. DG Jones P. Shrimpton (1991) Survey of CT Practice in the U.K. Part 3: Normalised Organ Doses Calculated Using Monte Carlo Techniques. NRPB 250. National Radiological Protection Board Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  25. M Zankl W Panzer G Drexler (1991) The Calculation of Dose from External Photon Exposures Using Reference Human Phantoms and Monte Carlo Methods. Part IV: Organ Dose From Computed Tomographic Examinations. GSF-Bericht 30/91. GSF–Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Institut für Strahlenschutz Neuherberg

    Google Scholar 

  26. CH McCollough (2003) ArticleTitlePatient dose in cardiac computed tomography. Herz 28 1–6 Occurrence Handle12616315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. WA Kalender H Wolf C Suess M Gies H Greess WA Bautz (1999) ArticleTitleDose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 9 323–328 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003300050674 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gtFyksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10101657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. M Gies WA Kalender H Wolf C Suess (1999) ArticleTitleDose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. Med Phys 26 2235–2247 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.598779 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Flt1CrtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10587204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. WA Kalender H Wolf C Suess (1999) ArticleTitleDose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26 2248–2253 Occurrence Handle10.1118/1.598738 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Flt1Crug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10587205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gerber TC, Stratman BP, Kuzo R, Morin RL. Effect of acquisition technique on radiation dose and image quality in computed tomographic coronary angiography with submillimeter collimation. Invest Radiol (in press).

  31. TC Gerber R Kuzo RE Safford (2005) ArticleTitlePosterior Mitral Valve Leaflet Prolapse Diagnosed With Multislice Computed Tomography. Heart 91 130 Occurrence Handle15657210 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2FjtVWqtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. Available at: http://www.icrp.org/docs/ICRP_87_CT_s.pps. Accessed June 28, 2004.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. Gerber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerber, T.C., Kuzo, R.S. & Morin, R.L. Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21, 165–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-5338-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-5338-6

Keywords

Navigation