Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998–2012

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To describe the number and proportion of eligible women receiving mammograms funded by the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP).

Methods

Low-income, uninsured, and underinsured women aged 40–64 are eligible for mammography screening through the NBCCEDP. We used data from the NBCCEDP, the Current Population Survey, and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to describe the number and proportion of women screened by the NBCCEDP and overall.

Results

In 2011 and 2012, the NBCCEDP screened 549,043 women aged 40–64, an estimated 10.6 % (90 % confidence interval [CI] 10.4–10.9 %) of the eligible population. We estimate that 30.6 % (90 % CI 26.4–34.8 %) of eligible women aged 40–64 were screened outside the NBCCEDP, and 58.8 % (90 % CI 54.6–63.0 %) were not screened. The proportion of eligible women screened by the NBCCEDP varied across states, with an estimated range of 3.2 % (90 % CI 2.9–3.5 %) to 52.8 % (90 % CI 36.1–69.6 %) and a median of 13.7 % (90 % CI 11.0–16.4 %). The estimated proportion of eligible women aged 40–64 who received mammograms through the NBCCEDP was relatively constant over time, 11.1 % (90 % CI 10.2–11.9 %) in 1998–1999 and 10.6 % (90 % CI 10.4–11.9 %) in 2011–2012 (p = 0.23), even as the number of women screened increased from 343,692 to 549,043.

Conclusions

Although the NBCCEDP provided screening services to over a half million low-income uninsured women for mammography, it served a small percentage of those eligible. The majority of low-income, uninsured women were not screened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L (2009) Screening for breast cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 151:727–737

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabatino SA, Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Breen N, Tangka F, Shaw KM (2008) Disparities in mammography use among US women aged 40–64 years, by race, ethnicity, income, and health insurance status, 1993 and 2005. Med Care 46:692–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Cancer screening—United States, 2010. MMWR 61:41–46

    Google Scholar 

  4. Finkelstein A, Taubman S, Wright B, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse JP, Allen H, Baicker K, Oregon Health Study Group (2012) The Oregon health insurance experiment: evidence from the first year. Quart J Econ 127:1057–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trivedi AN, Rakowski W, Ayanian JZ (2008) Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in medicare health plans. N Engl J Med 358:375–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee NC, Wong FL, Jamison PM, Jones SF, Galaska L, Brady KT, Wethers B, Stokes‐Townsend GA (2014) Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: the beginning. Cancer 120(Suppl 16):2540–2548

  7. Tangka FKL, Howard D, Royalty J, Danzell LP, O’Hara B, Miller J, Sabatino S, Joseph K, Guy G, Hall IJ (2014) Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997–2012. Cancer Causes Control (this supplement)

  8. Tangka FKL, Dalaker J, Chattopadhyay SK, Gardner JG, Royalty J, Hall IJ, DeGroff A, Blackman DK, Coates RJ (2006) Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002–2003. Cancer Causes Control 17:1145–1154

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2013) 2013 Poverty guidelines. http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/13poverty.cfm. Accessed 21 July 2014

  10. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith J (2013) Current Population Reports, P60–245. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2012. US Government Printing Office. http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p60-245.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014

  11. US Census Bureau (2013) Source and accuracy of estimates for income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2012. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/p60_245sa.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014

  12. US Census Bureau (2006) Current Population Survey: design and methodology. Technical paper 66. http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/tp-66.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014

  13. US Census Bureau. Modified race summary methodology. http://www.census.gov/popest/data/historical/files/MRSF-01-US1.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014

  14. Howard DH, Richardson LC, Thorpe KE (2009) Cancer screening and age in the United States and Europe. Health Aff 28:1838–1847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Machlin S, Yu W, Zodet M (2015) Computing standard errors for MEPS estimates. http://meps.ahrq.gov/survey_comp/standard_errors.jsp. Accessed 25 July 2015

  16. National Center for Health Statistics (2014). Health, United States, 2013: with special feature on prescription drugs. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus13.pdf#083. Accessed 21 July 2014

  17. Hoerger TJ, Ekwueme DU, Miller JW, Uzunangelov V, Hall IJ, Segel J, Royalty J, Gardner JG, Smith JL, Li C (2011) Estimated effects of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on breast cancer mortality. Am J Prev Med 40:397–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Mills RJ (2004) US Census Bureau Current Population Reports, P60-226, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2003. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sharpe RE Jr, Levin DC, Parker L, Rao VM (2013) The effect of the controversial US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on the use of screening mammography. J Am Coll Radiol 10:21–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang AT, Fan J, Van Houten HK, Tilburt JC, Stout NK, Montori VM, Shah ND (2014) Impact of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on screening mammography rates on women in their 40s. PLoS ONE 9:e91399

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Howard DH, Adams EK (2012) Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force breast cancer screening recommendation. Prev Med 55:485–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pace LE, He Y, Keating NL (2013) Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Cancer 119:2518–2523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. White A, Miller J, Royalty J, Ryerson BA, Benard V, Helsel W, Kammerer W (2015). Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009–2012. Cancer Causes Control (this supplement)

  24. Levy AR, Bruen BK, Ku L (2012) Health care reform and women’s insurance coverage for breast and cervical cancer screening. Prev Chronic Dis 9:E159

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office (2014) Updated estimates of the effects of the insurance coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act, April 2014. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/45231-ACA_Estimates.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2014

  26. Kaiser Family Foundation (2014) The coverage gap: uninsured poor adults in states that do not expand Medicaid. http://kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/the-coverage-gap-uninsured-poor-adults-in-states-that-donot-expand-medicaid/. Accessed 21 July 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Howard received support for this research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (12IPA1203126).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Howard.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the US Census Bureau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howard, D.H., Tangka, F.K.L., Royalty, J. et al. Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998–2012. Cancer Causes Control 26, 657–668 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0553-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0553-0

Keywords

Navigation