Skip to main content
Log in

Care-ful Work: An Ethics of Care Approach to Contingent Labour in the Creative Industries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of creative industries typically contend that creative work is profoundly precarious, taking place on a freelance basis in highly competitive, individualized and contingent labour markets. Such studies depict creative workers as correspondingly self-enterprising, self-reliant, self-interested and calculative agents who valorise care-free independence. In contrast, we adopt the ‘ethics of care’ approach to explore, recognize and appreciate the communitarian, relational and moral considerations as well as interpersonal connectedness and interdependencies that underpin creative work. Drawing on in-depth interviews with creative workers in a range of marginal socio-cultural contexts, we argue that creative workers cultivate and sustain a diverse array of practices of care arising from an affective concern with the well-being of others. Far from being merely individualistic and crudely competitive actors, creative workers enact practical ethical responsibilities and affectivities towards a range of human and non-human others, including families, local communities and neighbourhoods, colleagues, artistic scenes and their adjacent genres, and surrounding national and linguistic cultures. In emphasizing the fundamental and structuring role of care in contingent labour markets our approach accords with recent trends in the social sciences that ‘affirmatively’—as opposed to ‘negatively’ and ‘suspiciously’—recognize that mutuality, solidarity and affectivity are powerful drivers of action on a par with or even exceeding market-driven self-centredness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alacovska, A. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(12), 1563–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alacovska, A. (2019). ‘Keep hoping, keep going’: Towards a hopeful sociology of creative work. The Sociological Review, 67(5), 1118–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alacovska, A., & Gill, R. (2019). De-westernizing creative labour studies: The informality of creative work from an ex-centric perspective. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(2), 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, K. L. (2018). Critical complicity: The feel of difference at work in home and field. Management Learning, 49(5), 613–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspers, P. (2006). Markets in fashion: A phenomenological approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. (2006). Moral economy and cultural work. Sociology, 40(3), 455–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. (2017). Creative justice: Cultural industries, work and inequality. London: Pickering & Chatto Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E. (2008). The later Foucault in organisation and management studies. Human Relations, 61(4), 515–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beech, N., Gilmore, C., Hibbert, P., & Ybema, S. (2015). Identity-in-the-work and musicians’ struggles: The production of self-questioning identity work. Work, Employment and Society, 30(3), 506–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self. Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge,

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, S. (2019). Mum’s the word: Public testimonials and gendered experiences of negotiating caring responsibilities with work in the film and television industries. European Journal of Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549419839876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissonnette, J., & Arcand, S. (2018). Music entrepreneurs in a linguistic minority context: effectuation as adaptation to the paradoxes of digital technologies. Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts, 7(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonnette, J., & Robineau, A. (2017). Étude sur le développement des artistes et des entreprises de la musique œuvrant au sein des communautés francophones en situation minoritaire. Moncton: Institut Canadien de Recherche sur les Minorités Linguistiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S., Houlihan, M., & Laaser, K. (2012). Contingent work and its contradictions: towards a moral economy framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(1), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, S., & Laaser, K. (2013). Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy. Work, Employment & Society, 27(3), 508–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, J. L., & Thériault, J. Y. (Eds.). (2005). Petites sociétés et minorités nationales, enjeux et perspectives comparées. Montréal: Presses de l’Université du Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, N., & Stoyanova, R. S. (2018). No funny business: Precarious work and emotional labour in stand-up comedy. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718758880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conor, B., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (2015). Gender and creative labour. Sociological Review, 63, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbeil, J. P. (2012). Le français et la francophonie. Langue, Recensement de la population de 2011. Ottawa: Statistique Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Peuter, G. (2014). Beyond the model worker: Surveying a creative precariat. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 6(1), 263–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endrissat, N., Kärreman, D., & Noppeney, C. (2017). Incorporating the creative subject: Branding outside–in through identity incentives. Human Relations, 70(4), 488–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2011). Feminism and the politics of the commons. https://tobh.pw/7ir9hhq1hfz.pdf.

  • Felski, R. (2011). Critique and the hermeneutics of suspicion. M/C Journal, 15(1).

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1995). “ Holding hands at midnight”: The paradox of caring labor. Feminist Economics, 1(1), 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (Ed.). (2012). For love or money: Care provision in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. An interview with M. Foucault, 1984 by R. Fornet-Betancour et al. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, S., O’Brien, D., & Laurison, D. (2017). ‘Like skydiving without a parachute’: How class origin shapes occupational trajectories in British acting. Sociology, 51(5), 992–1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy. An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2014a). Academics, cultural workers and critical labour studies. Journal of Cultural Economy, 7(1), 12–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2014b). Unspeakable inequalities: Post feminism, entrepreneurial subjectivity and the repudiation of sexism among cultural workers. Social Politics, 21(4), 509–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M. (2015). Hack for good: Speculative labour, app development and the burden of austerity. The Fiberculture Journal, 25(186), 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Hanbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T., & Smith, R. J. (2015). Care and repair and the politics of urban kindness. Sociology, 49(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie, J. (2013). Fair play—art, performance and neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., & Vidal-Naquet, P. A. (2017). Might constraint be compatible with care? Home care as a situational ethics. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(5), 741–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2017). Capitalism and the media: Moral economy, well-being and capabilities. Media, Culture and Society, 39(2), 202–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, D. (2017). Critique nouvelle—an essay on affirmative-performative entrepreneurship research. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 16(1), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hracs, B. J., Grant, J. L., Haggett, J., & Morton, J. (2011). A tale of two scenes: civic capital and retaining musical talent in Toronto and Halifax. The Canadian Geographer, 55(3), 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivancheva, M., Lynch, K., & Keating, K. (2019). Precarity, gender and care in the neoliberal academy. Gender, Work and Organization, 26(4), 448–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H. (2012). Net work: Ethics and values in Web design. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1988). The micro-social order: towards a reconception. In N. Fielding (Ed.), Action and structure (pp. 21–53). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2018). Independent television production in the UK: From cottage industry to big business. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckman, S. (2012). Locating cultural work: The politics and poetics of rural, regional and remote creativity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2007). Love labour as a distinct and non-commodifiable form of care labour. The Sociological Review, 55(3), 550–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K., & Kalaitzke, M. (2018). Affective and calculative solidarity: The impact of individualism and neoliberal capitalism. European Journal of Social Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431018786379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, A., & Smith, C. (2009). Creative labour: Working in the creative industries. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (1998). British fashion design: Rag trade or image industry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2016). Be creative: Making a living in the new culture industry. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, A. (2015). Working for free in the VIP: Relational work and the production of consent. American Sociological Review, 80(6), 1099–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, P. M. (2006). Artistic labor markets: Contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 765–811). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2019). A practical ethics of care: Tinkering with different ‘goods’ in residential nursing homes. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04099-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, M. A. (2014). Virtues and human personhood in the social sciences. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity (pp. 21–41). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morén Alegret, H. (2016). La facturació discogràfica cau a un mínim històric. Anuari de la musica 2016 Enderrock, pp. 70–75.

  • Naudin, A. (2017). Cultural entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, G. (2012). Venture labour. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. K., & Smith, J. (1999). Working hard and making do: Surviving in small town America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2010). Moral education in an age of globalization. Educational Philosophy and Theory Banner, 42(4), 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K., & Ward, J. (2018). The art of the good life: Culture and sustainable prosperity. Cultural Trends, 27(1), 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, D., & Willmott, H. (2009). The decline of labour process analysis and the future sociology of work. Sociology, 43(5), 931–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V., & Land, C. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge companion to alternative organization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S., & Parker, M. (2017). Antagonism, accommodation and agonism in critical management studies: Alternative organizations as allies. Human Relations, 70(11), 1366–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primorac, J. (2014). The position and perspectives of cultural and creative industries in Southeastern Europe. Medijska istraživanja, 20(1), 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raw, A., & McKie, L. (2019). Exploring women’s mutuality in confronting care-precarity: ‘Care Accounts’—a conceptual tool. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519856236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1977). The question of proof in Freud’s psychoanalytic writings. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 25(4), 835–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, L., & Handy, J. (2012). An addictive environment: New Zealand film production workers’ subjective experiences of project-based labour. Human Relations, 65(5), 657–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, M. (2016). Fighting precarity with co-operation? Worker co-operatives in the cultural sector. New Formations, 88, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2000). Moral economy and political economy. Studies in Political Economy, 61(1), 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, C. (2016). The psychic life of neoliberalism. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(6), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini, P. (2018). Performance action: The politics of art activism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. T., & Thwaites, R. (2018). The composition of precarity: ‘Emerging’ composers’ experiences of opportunity culture in contemporary classical music. British Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. F. (2004). Extending conceptual boundaries: Work, voluntary work and employment. Work, Employment & Society, 18(1), 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townley, B., & Beech, N. (Eds.). (2010). Managing Creativity: Exploring the Paradox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresserras Gaju, J. M. (2013). Catalunya i la mundialització: Nous reptes per a la llengua i la cultura. In J. Albareda (Ed.), Catalunya, nació d’Europa 1714–2014 (pp. 766–789). Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umney, C. (2017). Moral economy, intermediaries and intensified competition in the labour market for function musicians. Work, Employment & Society, 31(5), 834–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umney, C., & Kretsos, L. (2015). ‘That’s the experience’: Passion, work precarity, and life transitions among London jazz musicians. Work and Occupations, 42(3), 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2010). Creative economy report. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2018). Creative economy outlook. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail, J., & Hollands, R. (2012). Cultural work and transformative arts: The dilemmas of the amber collective. Journal of Cultural Economy, 5(3), 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J., Sorensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberghe, F. (2017). Sociology as Moral Philosophy (and Vice Versa). Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 54(4), 405–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. C. (2009). Repaying favours: Unravelling the nature of community exchange in an English locality. Community Development Journal, 44(4), 488–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion: Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1995). Learning to care: Elementary kindness in an age of indifference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • XES. (2019). Xarxa d’economia solidària (XES) de Catalunya. http://xes.cat.

  • Zelizer, V. A. (2012). How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean? Politics & Society, 40(2), 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

These researches were supported by Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit (Grant no: MK_211), Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Alacovska.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

The research involved human participants and hence entailed dealing with personal data that have been managed, stored and protected in accordance with the Research Data Management requirements and Ethical Approval procedures in operation at the relevant national research institutions.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the participants in the study. All the participants were guaranteed confidentiality, anonymity and privacy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alacovska, A., Bissonnette, J. Care-ful Work: An Ethics of Care Approach to Contingent Labour in the Creative Industries. J Bus Ethics 169, 135–151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04316-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04316-3

Keywords

Navigation