Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In Pursuit of Eudaimonia: How Virtue Ethics Captures the Self-Understandings and Roles of Corporate Directors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent special issue in the Journal of Business Ethics gathered together a variety of papers addressing the challenges of putting virtue ethics into practice (Fontrodona et al in J Bus Ethics 113(4):563–565, 2013). The editors prefaced their outline of the various papers with the assertion that exploring the practical dimension of virtue ethics can help business leaders discover their proper place in working for a better world, as individuals and within the family, the business community and society in general (Fontrodona et al in J Bus Ethics 113(4):563–565, 2013). Scholars are yet to explore the role of virtuous organisational leaders in the pursuit of Eudaimonia. This paper is a qualitative study which considered company directors’ self-understandings in light of a virtue ethics conceptual framework. The aim of the study is to explore whether virtue ethics rather than deontology and consequentialism is a better vehicle for expressing directors’ self-understandings about their ideals and role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Director, Interview, Page.

References

  • Alzola, M. A. (2008). Character and environment: The status of virtues in organisations. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1993). The morality of happiness. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (2004). Being virtuous and doing the right thing American Philosophy Association. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Proceedings and addresses of the American philosophical association. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3219725.

  • Annas, J. (2008). The phenomenology of virtue. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (2009). Virtue ethics symposium conducted at the meeting of the Oxford University Press.

  • Arjoon, S. (2000). Virtue theory as a dynamic theory of business. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(2), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjoon, S. (2005). Corporate governance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 343–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arksey, H., & Knight, P. (1999). Interviewing for social scientists. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. G., Audi, R., & Zwolinski, M. (2010). Recent work in ethical theory and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(4), 559–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (2012). Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, A., & Maniam, B. (2008). A comparison of U.S. corporate governance and European corporate governance. Business Review Cambridge, 9(2), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, R. (2013). Managerial work in a practice-embodying institution: The role of calling, the virtue of constancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 679–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (2009). Interviewing experts. Basingstroke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, M. (2000). Basic ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragues, G. (2006). Seek the good life, not money: The Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, V. (2008). Empirical business ethics research and paradigm analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 429–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, S. (1991). Ethics with Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (1999). Are you ethical? Please tick yes or no: On researching ethics in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, C. (2006). A practical guide to research methods. Oxford: Howtobooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine, F., & Heath, S. (2009). Doing social science: Evidence and methods in empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duska, R. (1993). Aristotle: A pre-modern post-modern? Implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(3), 227–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer-DeWitt, P. (2014). Apple’s Tim Cook picks a fight with climate change deniers. Fortune (March 1). Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2014/03/01/apples-tim-cook-picks-a-fight-with-climate-change-deniers/.

  • Fernando, M., & Moore, G. (2015). MacIntyrean virtue ethics in business: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona, J., Sison, A., & de Bruin, B. (2013). Editorial introduction: Putting virtues into practice. A challenge for business and organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 563–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frierson, P. (2003). Freedom and anthropology in Kant’s moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandossy, R., & Sonnenfeld, J. (2005). I see nothing, I hear nothing: culture, corruption and apathy. International journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2(3), 228–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Network of Directors’ Institutes. (2016). Global network of directors’ institutes. Retrieved from http://www.gndi.org/.

  • Gray, D. (2004). Doing research in the real world. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronbacher, G. (1998). The need for economic personalism. The Journal of Markets and Morality, 1(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. (2008). Socratic questions and Aristotelian answers: A virtue-based approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(3), 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. (2011). Virtue, profit, and the separation thesis: An Aristotelian view. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, K. P., Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. (2010). How boards strategise: A strategy as practice view. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. Retrieved from http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file23021.pdf.

  • Homiak, M. (2015). Moral character. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/moral-character/.

  • Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, R. (2013). Virtue ethics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue/.

  • IESE Business School. Global Executive MBA. Retrieved 2013, from http://www.iese.edu/.

  • Interface Global. (2016). Interface’s history. Retrieved from http://www.interfaceglobal.com/company/history.aspx.

  • Koehn, D. (1995). A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(3), 533–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (1998). Virtue ethics, the firm and moral psychology. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 497–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (1979). Two conceptions of happiness. The Philosophical Review, 88(2), 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2002). Founders: Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, J. (1988). Character and ethical theory. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 13(1), 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, J. (1991). Character. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laverty, S. (2008). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, K., & Willis, D. (2004). Descriptive versus interpretive phenomenology: Their contributions to nursing knowledge. Qualitative Research Design, 14(5), 726–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J., & Beck-Dudley, C. (1994). Are deontology and teleology mutually exclusive? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 615–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, B., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1995). An analysis of response bias in executives’ self-reports. Journal of Marketing Management, 11(8), 835–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D. (2005). Ethical education in accounting: Integrating rules, values and virtues. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, D. (2012). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2005). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 659–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2008). Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(04), 483–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2012). Virtue in business: Alliance boots and an empirical exploration of MacIntyre’s conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 33(3), 363–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, K., & Brammer, S. (2016). Governance and virtue: The case of public order policing. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research method. Whitewater: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patagonia. (2016). Don’t buy this jacket. Retrieved 12 Sept, 2016, from https://www.patagonia.com/worn-wear.html.

  • Perez-Lopez, A. (1991). Teoria de la accion humana en las organizaciones. La accion personal. Madrid: Rialp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G. (2001). Research in business ethics. Koers-Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 66(3), 197–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2016). Aristotle: Ethics. In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/aris-eth/.

  • Schwartz, M., Dunfee, T., & Kline, M. (2005). Tone at the top: An ethics code for directors? Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1–3), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekerka, L. (2009). Organizational ethics education and training: A review of best practices and their application. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(2), 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfridges. (2016). Buying better, inspiring change. Retrieved Sept 12, 2016, from http://www.selfridges.com/QA/en/content/buyingbetter.

  • Sherman, N. (1989). The fabric of character: Aristotle’s theory of virtue. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, R., & Straits, B. (2010). Approaches to social science research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. (2003). The moral capital of leaders: Why virtue matters. Cheltenam: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics: An Aristotelian perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. (2011). Aristotelian corporate governance. In A. Brink (Ed.), Corporate governance and business ethics (pp. 179–201). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. (2016). Happiness and virtue ethics in business: The ultimate value proposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A., & Ferrero, I. (2015). How different is neo-Aristotelian virtue from positive organizational virtuousness? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(S2), S78–S98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(02), 211–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A., & Fontrodona, J. (2013). Participating in the common good of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 611–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (2003). Victims of circumstances? A defense of virtue ethics in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (2005). What’s character got to do with it? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 71(3), 648–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (2006). On ethics and living well. Belmont: Thomson-Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia. (2003). Australian standard: Good governance principles 8000–2003. Sydney: Standards Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Termes, R. (1995). Ethics in financial institutions. In A. Argandona (Ed.), The ethical dimension of financial institutions and markets (pp. 118–135). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, M. (1997). Survey of theories employed in business ethics. PHD. Research Paper (No. 349). IESE, Barcelona. Retrieved from http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0349-E.pdf.

  • Whetstone, J. (2001). How virtue fits within business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (Vol. 2). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers, M., Hillman, A., & Cannella, A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zealand, Securities Commission New. (2004). Corporate governance in New Zealand: Principles and guidelines. Wellington: Securities Commission New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Level 1, WY Building, WY 123, 120 Mayoral Drive, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand

    Patricia Grant

  2. Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand

    Patricia Grant & Peter McGhee

  3. Department of Management Studies, Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago

    Surendra Arjoon

  4. Level 1, WY Building, WY 101, 120 Mayoral Drive, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand

    Peter McGhee

Authors
  1. Patricia Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Surendra Arjoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter McGhee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Grant.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Waikato research ethics committee (Hamilton, New Zealand) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, P., Arjoon, S. & McGhee, P. In Pursuit of Eudaimonia: How Virtue Ethics Captures the Self-Understandings and Roles of Corporate Directors. J Bus Ethics 153, 389–406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3432-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3432-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation