Abstract
This paper takes a critical perspective on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and examines the ways in which an industry organization discursively manages the relationship between the industry and its stakeholders in a situation where the legitimacy of the industry is called into question. Drawing on the literature on organizational narcissism and sensemaking the paper develops the construct of narcissistic CSR orientation and empirically elaborates on three defensive rhetorical strategies through which the organization makes sense of the accountability and responsibility of the industry for the negative societal effects of their business. The paper advances knowledge in the field of critical CSR by proposing a new framework for critically examining organization-stakeholder relationships and organizational responses to stakeholder demands in contexts where the interests of organizations are in conflict with the public good.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ABA:
-
American Beverage Association
- CSPI:
-
Center for Science in the Public Interest
- CSR:
-
Corporate Social Responsibility
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
References
Agle, B., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R., & Wood, D. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(2), 134–156.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.
Ashman, I., & Winstanley, D. (2007). For or against corporate identity? Personification and the problem of moral agency. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 83–95.
Aula, P. (2010). Social media, reputation risk and ambient publicity management. Strategy & Leadership, 38(6), 43–49.
Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.
Banerjee, S. B. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 265–274.
Barnett, M. L. (2006a). Finding a working balance between competitive and communal strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1753–1773.
Barnett, M. L. (2006b). Waves of collectivizing: A dynamic model of competition and cooperation over the life of an industry. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(4), 272–292.
Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.
Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 576–609.
Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 864–888.
Brown, A. D. (1997). Narcissism, identity, and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 643–686.
Brown, A. D., & Starkey, K. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 102–120.
Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467–480.
Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G. D., Sedikides, C., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Narcissism and comparative self-enhancement strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(3), 329–347.
Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.
Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2000). Self-absorption and self-seduction in the corporate identity game. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. Holten Larsen (Eds.), The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand (pp. 256–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Craig, R., & Amernic, J. (2011). Detecting linguistic traces of destructive narcissism at-a-distance in a CEO’s letter to shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 563–575.
de Bakker, F. G. A., & den Hond, F. (2008). Introducing the politics of stakeholder influence. Business and Society, 47(1), 8–20.
Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44–56.
Doane, D. (2005). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Minnows, mammoths and markets. Futures, 37, 215–229.
Dorfman, L., Cheyne, A., Friedman, L. C., Wadud, A., & Gottlieb, M. (2012). Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: How do they compare? PLoS Medicine, 9, e1001241.
Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55(7), 553–560.
Duchon, D., & Burns, M. (2008). Organizational narcissism. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 354–364.
Duchon, D., & Drake, B. (2009). Organizational narcissism and virtuous behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 301–308.
Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2008). Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth? Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 771–773.
Fieseler, C., Fleck, M., & Meckel, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(4), 599–614.
Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London: Sage.
Fleming, P., Roberts, J., & Garsten, C. (2013). In search of corporate social responsibility: Introduction to special issue. Organization, 20(3), 337–348.
Ganesh, S. (2003). Organizational narcissism: Technology, legitimacy, and identity in an Indian NGO. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 558–594.
Gill, A. M., & Whedbee, K. (1997). Rhetoric. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as structure and process: Vol. 1. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 157–184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), 433–448.
Greenfield, W. M. (2004). In the name of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 47(1), 19–28.
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315–327.
Grunig, J. E. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. PRism, 6(2), 1–19.
Heracleous, L. (2006). A tale of three discourses: The dominant, the strategic and the marginalized. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 2322–2380.
Hillman, A. J., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Academy of Management Review, 24(6), 825–842.
Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.
Jones, M. T., & Fleming, P. (2003). Unpacking complexity through critical stakeholder analysis: The case of globalization. Business and Society, 42(4), 430–454.
Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414.
Ketola, T. (2008). A holistic corporate responsibility model: Integrating values, discourses and actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(3), 419–435.
King, G. (2007). Narcissism and effective crisis management: A review of potential problems and pitfalls. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 15(4), 183–193.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Kuhn, T., & Deetz, S. (2008). Critical theory and corporate social responsibility: Can/should we get beyond cynical reasoning. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 173–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindgreen, A., Maon, F., Reast, R., & Yani-De-Soriano, M. (2012). Guest editorial: Corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 393–395.
Lindorff, M., Jonson, E. P., & McGuire, L. (2012). Strategic corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors: The social value of harm minimisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 457–467.
Lubit, R. (2002). The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 127–138.
Maccoby, M. (2004). Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. Harvard Business Review, 82(1), 92–101.
Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49.
Malik, V. S., Schulze, M. B., & Hu, F. B. (2006). Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84(2), 274–288.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 71–89.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20–38.
Maon, F., Swaen, V., & Lindgreen, A. (2012). Make sense who may: Corporate social responsibility as a continuous multi-stakeholder co-construction process. In A. Lindgreen, P. Kotler, F. Maon, & J. Vanhamme (Eds.), A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: Pressures, conflicts, and reconciliation (pp. 317–330). Aldershot: Gower.
Matten, D. (2009). Review Essay: “It’s the politics, stupid!”: Reflections on the role of business in contemporary nonfiction. Business & Society, 48(4), 565–576. doi:10.1177/0007650309337123
Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1–2), 109–120.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
Morf, C. C., Weir, C., & Davidov, M. (2000). Narcissism and intrinsic motivation: The role of goal congruence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(4), 424–438.
Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). Editorial: A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business ethics: A European review, 15(4), 316–322.
O’Higgins, E. R. E. (2010). Corporations, civil society, and stakeholders: An organizational conceptualization. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 157–176.
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K. & Flegal, K. M. (2012). Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS Data Brief No. 82. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
Palazzo, G., & Richter, U. (2005). CSR business as usual? The case of the tobacco industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 387–401.
Phillips, N., & Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 435–481.
Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10(2), 249–265.
Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 617–633.
Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1144–1413.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.
Sethi, S. P. (1979). A conceptual framework for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review, 4(1), 63–74.
Sip & Savor (2013), American Beverage Association blog. http://www.ameribev.org/blog/.
Stein, M. (2003). Unbounded irrationality: Risk and organizational narcissism at Long Term Capital Management. Human Relations, 56(5), 523–540.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetoric strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67.
Sutherland Rahman, S., Waddock, S., Andriof, J., & Husted, B. (2003). Introduction. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking 2: Relationships, communication, reporting and performance (pp. 9–12). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Vaara, E. (2010). Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as a multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon. Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 29–50.
Vaara, E., & Tienari, J. (2008). A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNC’s. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 985–993.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
Vartanian, L. R., Schwartz, M. B., & Brownell, K. D. (2007). Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 97(4), 667–675.
Watson, T. J. (1995). Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, 16(5), 805–821.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Wodak, R. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 197–213). London: Sage.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2000). Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation (WHO Technical Report Series 894). Geneva.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2013). Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet No. 311. Updated March 2013. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed 11 Sept 2013.
Yoon, S. and Lam, T. H. (2013). The illusion of righteousness: corporate social responsibility practices of the alcohol industry. BMC Public Health 13(1), 630. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/630. Accessed 28 Nov 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
We need to open up new spaces and provide new frameworks for organization-stakeholder dialogs, as well as critically examine the dynamics of the relationships between corporations, NGOs, governments, community groups and funding agencies (Banerjee 2008).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iivonen, K., Moisander, J. Rhetorical Construction of Narcissistic CSR Orientation. J Bus Ethics 131, 649–664 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2298-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2298-1