Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of a prior diagnosis of DCIS on survival from invasive breast cancer

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A diagnosis of invasive breast cancer after DCIS can be described as a new primary cancer or as a local invasive recurrence. It is of interest to determine if, among women with early-stage breast cancer, a past history of DCIS influences survival. We retrieved the records of 306,249 women diagnosed with stage I or stage II breast cancer between 2004 and 2012, in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registries database, of whom 5395 had a previous diagnosis of DCIS. For each patient, we extracted information on the year of diagnosis, age at diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, grade, estrogen receptor status, type of surgery (lumpectomy/mastectomy), use of radiotherapy (no/yes), prior DCIS (no/yes), cause of death, and follow-up time. For each case with prior DCIS, we recorded information on the year of diagnosis of DCIS, laterality of DCIS, and treatments received for DCIS. We matched 3979 patients with a prior DCIS to 3979 patients without a prior DCIS, according to the various prognostic features of the invasive cancer. We estimated the risk of death from breast cancer for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, with and without a prior diagnosis of DCIS. We identified 306,249 women with stage I/II breast cancer, of whom 2335 had a prior ipsilateral DCIS and 3060 had a prior contralateral DCIS. Breast cancer-specific survival at 9 years was 94.6 % for patients with a prior DCIS (ipsilateral or contralateral) and was 95.2 % for patients with no prior DCIS (p = 0.32). In a matched analysis (3979 matched pairs), the hazard ratio for death from breast cancer for patients with a prior ipsilateral DCIS, compared to patients with no prior DCIS, was 0.91 (95 % CI = 0.49–1.68; p = 0.75). A prior diagnosis of ipsilateral DCIS does not impact upon the prognosis of women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. This suggests that primary breast cancers and local invasive recurrences following DCIS are similar conditions and should be treated in the same way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds) (2012) WHO classification of tumours of the breast, 4th edn. IARC, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arvold ND, Punglia RS, Hughes ME et al (2012) Pathologic characteristics of second breast cancers after breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 118(24):6022–6030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee LA, Silverstein MJ, Chung CT et al (2006) Breast cancer-specific mortality after invasive local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma-in situ of the breast. Am J Surg 192:416–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang E, Bucholz TA, Meric F et al (2002) Classifying local disease recurrences after breast conservation therapy based on location and histology: new primary tumours have more favourable outcomes than true local disease recurrences. Cancer 95(10):2059–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1233–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347(16):1227–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Sun P (2015) Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol 1(7):888–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Falk R, Hofvind S, Skaane P, Haldorsen T (2011) Second events following ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a register-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:929–938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Warnberg F, garmo H, Emdin S et al (2014) Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ: 20 years follow-up in the randomized SweDCIS trial. J Clin Oncol 32:3613–3618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donker M, Litiere S, Werutsky G et al (2013) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31:4054–4059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuart KE, Houssami N, Taylor R, Hayen A, Boyages J (2015) Long-term outcomes of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. BMC Cancer 15:890

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sopik V, Nofech-Moses S, Sun P (2016) The relationship between local recurrence and death in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155(1):175–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith TE, Lee D, Turner B, Carter D, Haffty B (2000) True recurrence versus new primary breast tumour relapse: an analysis of clinical and pathologic differences and their implications in natural history, prognoses, and therapeutic management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48(5):1281–1289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dent R, Valentini A, Hanna W et al (2014) Factors associated with breast cancer mortality after local recurrence. Curr Oncol 21(3):418–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Engel J, Eckel R, Kerr J et al (2003) The process of metastasisation for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 39:1794–1806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson S, Wapnir I, Dignam J et al (2009) Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2466–2473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wapnir I, Anderson S, Mamounas E et al (2006) Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols of node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2028–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Witteveen A, Kwast A, Sonke G, Ijzerman M, Siesling S (2015) Survival after locoregional recurrence or second primary breast cancer: impact of the disease-free interval. PLoS One 10(4):e0120832

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yi M, Buchholz T, Meric-Bernstam F et al (2011) Classification of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences after breast conservation therapy can predict patient prognosis and facilitate treatment planning. Ann Surg 253(3):572–579

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven A. Narod.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sopik, V., Iqbal, J., Sun, P. et al. Impact of a prior diagnosis of DCIS on survival from invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158, 385–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3894-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3894-9

Keywords

Navigation