Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lymph node status in inflammatory breast cancer

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Positive lymph node status in breast cancer is known to be an adverse prognostic factor, but the effect of lymph node (LN) status in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has not been evaluated. This study was designed to investigate the association between lymph node status and overall survival (OS) in individuals with IBC. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry, we collected data on 761 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic IBC from 2004 to 2008. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to evaluate univariate and multivariate associations between estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, treatment, and OS. Positive nodal status was associated with a significant decrease in OS (p < 0.001). Five-year survival for LN-positive and LN-negative patients was 49 and 66 %, respectively. In node-positive patients, ER or PR positivity was associated with improved OS, (p = 0.025, p = 0.007). In node-positive patients, the combination of surgery and radiation therapy improved OS when compared with surgery alone (p = 0.002). Nearly 80 % of the patients in this study had nodal metastasis. Positive nodal status was found to be an adverse prognostic factor. ER/PR positivity and treatment with surgery and radiation in node-positive patients was found to improve outcomes. Further studies are required to characterize the biology of IBC and guide the optimal treatment of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dawood S, Ueno NT, Valero V et al (2011) Differences in survival among women with stage III inflammatory and noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer appear early: a large population-based study. Cancer 117(9):1819–1826. doi:10.1002/cncr.25682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawood S, Merajver SD, Viens P et al (2011) International expert panel on inflammatory breast cancer: consensus statement for standardized diagnosis and treatment. Ann Oncol 22(3):515–523. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq345

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hance KW, Anderson WF, Devesa SS et al (2005) Trends in inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program at the National Cancer Institute. J Natl Cancer Inst 97(13):966–975. doi:10.1093/dji172

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zell JA, Tsang WY, Taylor TH et al (2009) Prognostic impact of human epidermal growth factor-like receptor 2 and hormone receptor status in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): analysis of 2,014 IBC patient cases from the California Cancer Registry. Breast Cancer Res 11(1):R9. doi:10.1186/bcr2225

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parton M, Dowsett M, Ashley S et al (2004) High incidence of HER-2 positivity in inflammatory breast cancer. Breast 13(2):97–103. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2003.08.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ueno NT, Buzdar AU, Singletary SE et al (1997) Combined-modality treatment of inflammatory breast carcinoma: Twenty years of experience at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer Chemoth Pharm 40(4):321–329. doi:10.1007/s002800050664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang S, Parker SL, Pham T et al (1998) Inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute, 1975–1992. Cancer 82(12):2366–2372. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980615)82:12<2366:aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-n

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawood S, Ueno NT, Valero V et al (2012) Identifying factors that impact survival among women with inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23(4):870–875. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rehman S, Reddy CA, Tendulkar RD (2012) Modern outcomes of inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 84(3):619–624. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy BT et al (2007) Trends for inflammatory breast cancer: is survival improving? Oncologist 12(8):904–912. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-8-904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dawood S, Lei X, Dent R et al (2014) Survival of women with inflammatory breast cancer: a large population based study. Ann Oncol 25(6):1143–1151. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cristofanilli M, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Buzdar AU et al (2004) Paclitaxel improves the prognosis in estrogen receptor negative inflammatory breast cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Clin Breast Cancer 4(6):415–419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program ( http://www.seer.cancer.gov ) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2011 Sub (1973–2009) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969–2010 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2012, based on the November 2011 submission

  14. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15(7):2483–2493

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz GF, Birchansky CA, Komarnicky LT et al (1994) Induction chemotherapy followed by breast conservation for locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 73(2):362–369. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19940115)73:2<362:aid-cncr2820730221>3.0.co;2-l

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCready DR, Hortobagyi GN, Kau SW et al (1989) The prognostic significance of lymph node metastases after preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Arch Surg 124(1):21–25. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410010027005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL et al (1999) Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17(2):460–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abe O, Abe R, Enomoto K et al (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366(9503):2087–2106. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group) (2014) Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet 383(9935):2127–2135. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60488-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li J, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Allen PK et al (2011) Triple-negative subtype predicts poor overall survival and high locoregional relapse in inflammatory breast cancer. Oncologist 16(12):1675–1683. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0196

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378(9793):771–784. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60993-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stearns V, Ewing CA, Slack R et al (2002) Sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer may reliably represent the axilla except for inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 9(3):235–242. doi:10.1245/aso.2002.9.3.235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cristofanilli M, Valero V, Buzdar AU et al (2007) Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and patterns of recurrence: understanding the biology of a unique disease. Cancer 110(7):1436–1444. doi:10.1002/cncr.22927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bristol IJ, Woodward WA, Strom EA et al (2008) Locoregional treatment outcomes after multimodality management of inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol 72(2):474–484. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dawood S, Cristofanilli M (2011) Inflammatory breast cancer: what progress have we made? Oncol NY 25(3):264–273

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375(9712):377–384. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61964-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported in part by SC CTSI (NIH/NCATS) through Grant UL1TROOO130 and P30CA014089 from the National Cancer Institute. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute of Health.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie E. Lang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wecsler, J.S., Tereffe, W., Pedersen, R.C. et al. Lymph node status in inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 151, 113–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3367-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3367-6

Keywords

Navigation