Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic differences in survival among breast cancer patients in the Netherlands not explained by tumor size

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There seem to be socioeconomically differences in survival for females with breast cancer, usually associated with a higher stage of disease. However, differences within tumor size have not been studied. Aim of this study is to assess differences in survival according to socioeconomic status (SES), stratified for tumor size and stage at diagnosis, for females with breast cancer in the Netherlands. All females diagnosed with breast cancer (1995–2005) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were linked to a SES database according to postal code. A multivariable logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with SES. Overall survival (OS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated. Overall, 127,599 patients were included. Higher SES was associated with lower T-stage (P < 0.0001). A decreased survival (OS and RS) was found for patients with a lower SES. Also within different size groups, RS was different. Overall, 10-year OS for the high SES group was 65 and 58% for the low SES group (hazard ratio 1.1, P < 0.001) and RS was 79 versus 74% (relative excess risk, RER 1.2; P < 0.001). The socioeconomic differences remained statistically significant (P < 0.001) after adjustment for age, year of diagnosis, grade, TNM stage, and treatment. For the lowest SES group 777 deaths could be avoided. Socioeconomic differences in survival of breast cancer patients were observed in the Netherlands. Higher stage at diagnosis of patients with a lower SES only partly explains the decreased survival. Policies aimed at the reduction of socioeconomic health inequalities might be important to improve survival of breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Singh GK, Lin YD et al (2009) Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 20(4):417–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor A, Cheng KK (2003) Social deprivation and breast cancer. J Public Health Med 25(3):228–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomson CS, Hole DJ, Twelves CJ, Brewster DH, Black RJ (2001) Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: distribution by socioeconomic status and effect on differences in survival. J Epidemiol Community Health 55(5):308–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP, Lutz JM, Quinn MJ, Coleman MP (1995) Deprivation and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 72(3):738–743

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pollock AM, Vickers N (1998) Deprivation and emergency admissions for cancers of colorectum, lung, and breast in south east England: ecological study. BMJ 317(7153):245–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutqvist LE, Bern A (2006) Socioeconomic gradients in clinical stage at presentation and survival among breast cancer patients in the Stockholm area 1977–1997. Int J Cancer 119(6):1433–1439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Faggiano F, Partanen T, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer incidence and mortality. IARC Sci Publ 138:65–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Loon AJ, Brug J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Burg J (1995) Differences in cancer incidence and mortality among socio-economic groups. Scand J Soc Med 23(2):110–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braaten T, Weiderpass E, Lund E (2009) Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. BMC Public Health 9:178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP (2006) Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol 17(1):5–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G (2006) Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 119(5):1145–1151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Twelves CJ, Thomson CS, Gould A, Dewar JA (1998) Variation in the survival of women with breast cancer in Scotland. The Scottish Breast Cancer Focus Group and The Scottish Cancer Therapy Network. Br J Cancer 78(5):566–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Macleod U, Ross S, Gillis C, McConnachie A, Twelves C, Watt GC (2000) Socio-economic deprivation and stage of disease at presentation in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol 11(1):105–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon NH (1995) Association of education and income with estrogen receptor status in primary breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 142(8):796–803

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Norredam M, Groenvold M, Petersen JH, Krasnik A (1998) Effect of social class on tumour size at diagnosis and surgical treatment in Danish women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 47(11):1659–1663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C (2002) Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(7):490–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L (2004) Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 108(5):754–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Louwman WJ, van de Poll-Franse LV, Fracheboud J, Roukema JA, Coebergh JW (2007) Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 105(3):369–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wojcik BE, Spinks MK, Optenberg SA (1998) Breast carcinoma survival analysis for African American and white women in an equal-access health care system. Cancer 82(7):1310–1318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tesser P, Van Praag C, Van Dugteren F, Herweijer L, Van der Wouden H (1995) Rapportage minderheden 1995. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau/VUGA, Rijswijk/Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luke C, Nguyen AM, Priest K, Roder D (2004) Female breast cancers are getting smaller, but socio-demographic differences remain. Aust N Z J Public Health 28(4):312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schrijvers CT, Coebergh JW, van der Heijden LH, Mackenbach JP (1995) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands, 1980–1989. Eur J Cancer 31A(10):1660–1664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeffreys M, Sarfati D, Stevanovic V, Tobias M, Lewis C, Pearce N et al (2009) Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in New Zealand: the role of extent of disease at diagnosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(3):915–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen-Heijnen ML, Maas HA, Houterman S, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Coebergh JW (2007) Comorbidity in older surgical cancer patients: influence on patient care and outcome. Eur J Cancer 43(15):2179–2193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Griggs JJ, Culakova E, Sorbero ME, van Ryn M, Poniewierski MS, Wolff DA et al (2007) Effect of patient socioeconomic status and body mass index on the quality of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25(3):277–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee-Feldstein A, Anton-Culver H, Feldstein PJ (1994) Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival. Delivery systems and medical outcomes. JAMA 271(15):1163–1168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dominguez-Berjon F, Borrell C, Rodriguez-Sanz M, Pastor V (2006) The usefulness of area-based socioeconomic measures to monitor social inequalities in health in Southern Europe. Eur J Public Health 16(1):54–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hyndman JC, Holman CD, Hockey RL, Donovan RJ, Corti B, Rivera J (1995) Misclassification of social disadvantage based on geographical areas: comparison of postcode and collector’s district analyses. Int J Epidemiol 24(1):165–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Byers TE, Wolf HJ, Bauer KR, Bolick-Aldrich S, Chen VW, Finch JL et al (2008) The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States: findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer 113(3):582–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yood MU, Johnson CC, Blount A, Abrams J, Wolman E, McCarthy BD et al (1999) Race and differences in breast cancer survival in a managed care population. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(17):1487–1491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bickell NA, Wang JJ, Oluwole S, Schrag D, Godfrey H, Hiotis K et al (2006) Missed opportunities: racial disparities in adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Clin Oncol 24(9):1357–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF 2007-3968) and the Netherlands Cancer Registry.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Bastiaannet or G. J. Liefers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bastiaannet, E., de Craen, A.J.M., Kuppen, P.J.K. et al. Socioeconomic differences in survival among breast cancer patients in the Netherlands not explained by tumor size. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127, 721–727 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1250-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1250-z

Keywords

Navigation