Skip to main content
Log in

Source Localisation of Visual Evoked Potentials in Congenitally Deaf Individuals

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that individuals deprived of auditory input can compensate with specific superior abilities in the remaining sensory modalities. To better understand the neural basis of deafness-induced changes, the present study used electroencephalography to examine visual functions and cross-modal reorganization of the auditory cortex in deaf individuals. Congenitally deaf participants and hearing controls were presented with reversing chequerboard stimuli that were systematically modulated in luminance ratio. The two groups of participants showed similar modulation of visual evoked potential (VEP) amplitudes (N85, P110) and latencies (P110) as a function of luminance ratio. Analysis of VEPs revealed faster neural processing in deaf participants compared with hearing controls at early stages of cortical visual processing (N85). Deaf participants also showed higher amplitudes (P110) than hearing participants. In contrast to our expectations, the results from VEP source analysis revealed no clear evidence for cross-modal reorganization in the auditory cortex of deaf participants. However, deaf participants tended to show higher activation in posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Moreover, modulation of PPC responses as a function of luminance was also stronger in deaf than in hearing participants. Taken together, these findings are an indication of more efficient neural processing of visual information in the deaf, which may relate to functional changes, in particular in multisensory parietal cortex, as a consequence of early auditory deprivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armington JC (1968) Electroretinogram visual evoked potential and area-luminance relation. Vision Res 8:263–276. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(68)90014-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong BA, Neville HJ, Hillyard SA, Mitchell TV (2002) Auditory deprivation affects processing of motion, but not color. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 14:422–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Neville HJ (2002) Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Rev Neurosci 3:443–452. doi:10.1038/nrn848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Tomann A, Hutton C, Mitchell T, Corina D, Liu G, Neville H (2000) Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. J Neurosci 20:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Brozinsky C, Tomann A, Mitchell T, Neville H, Liu GY (2001) Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing. J Neurosci 21:8931–8942

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1995) An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7:1129–1159. doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bizley JK, King AJ (2009) Visual influences on ferret auditory cortex. Hear Res 258:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.017

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bledowski C, Prvulovic D, Hoechstetter K, Scherg M, Wibral M, Goebel R, Linden DEJ (2004) Localizing p300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: a combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 24:9353–9360. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1897-04.2004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bledowski C, Kadosh KC, Wibral M, Rahm B, Bittner RA, Hoechstetter K, Scherg M, Maurer K, Goebel R, Linden DEJ (2006) Mental chronometry of working memory retrieval: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related potentials approach. J Neurosci 26:821–829. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3542-05.2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bottari D, Nava E, Ley P, Pavani F (2010) Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals. Restor Neurol Neurosci 28:167–179. doi:10.3233/rnn-2010-0502

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottari D, Caclin A, Giard MH, Pavani F (2011) Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals. PLoS One 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025607

  • Brosch M, Selezneva E, Scheich H (2005) Nonauditory events of a behavioral procedure activate auditory cortex of highly trained monkeys. J Neurosci 25:6797–6806. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1571-05.2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Büchel C, Friston KJ (1997) Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fmri. Cereb Cortex 7:768–778. doi:10.1093/cercor/7.8.768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley KA, Tobey EA (2011) Cross-modal plasticity and speech perception in pre- and postlingually deaf cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 32:2–15. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e8534c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Zhang M, Zhou XL (2006) Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (ior) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people. Brain Res 1109:117–127. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.043

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chlubnova J, Kremlacek J, Kubova Z, Kuba M (2005) Visual evoked potentials and event related potentials in congenitally deaf subjects. Physiol Res 54:577–583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark VP, Fan S, Hillyard SA (1995) Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 2:170–187. doi:10.1002/hbm.460020306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codina C, Pascalis O, Mody C, Toomey P, Rose J, Gummer L, Buckley D (2011) Visual advantage in deaf adults linked to retinal changes. PLoS One 6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020417

  • Debener S, Hine J, Bleeck S, Eyles J (2008) Source localization of auditory evoked potentials after cochlear implantation. Psychophysiology 45:20–24. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00610.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Debener S, Thorne J, Schneider TR, Viola F (2010) Using ICA for the analysis of multi-channel EEG data. In: Ullsperger M, Debener S (eds) Simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Recording, analysis, and application. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 121–134

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) Eeglab: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial eeg dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Russo F, Martinez A, Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Hillyard SA (2002) Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp 15:95–111. doi:10.1002/hbm.10010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dye MWG, Hauser PC, Bavelier D (2009) Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view. PLoS One 4. doi:e5640 10.1371/journal.pone.0005640

  • Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine I, Finney EM, Boynton GM, Dobkins KR (2005) Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 17:1621–1637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finney EM, Fine I, Dobkins KR (2001) Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat Neurosci 4:1171–1173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finney EM, Clementz BA, Hickok G, Dobkins KR (2003) Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects: evidence from meg. NeuroReport 14:1425–1427. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000079894.11980.6a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazanfar AA, Schroeder CE (2006) Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends Cogn Sci 10:278–285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giraud AL, Truy E, Frackowiak R (2001) Imaging plasticity in cochlear implant patients. Audiol Neuro-Otol 6:381–393. doi:10.1159/000046847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez Gonzalez CM, Clark VP, Fan S, Luck SJ, Hillyard SA (1994) Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr 7:41–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauthal N, Sandmann P, Debener S, Thorne JD (2013) Visual movement perception in deaf and hearing individuals. Advances in cognitive psychology 9:53–61. doi:10.2478/v10053-008-0131-z

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hine J, Debener S (2007) Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1274–1285. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johannes S, Munte TF, Heinze HJ, Mangun GR (1995) Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Cognit Brain Res 2:189–205. doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)90008-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung TP, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee TW, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, Sejnowski TJ (2000a) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37:163–178. doi:10.1017/s0048577200980259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ (2000b) Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1745–1758. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00386-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertz N, Gizewski ER, de Greiff A, Forsting M (2005) Cross-modal plasticity in deaf subjects dependent on the extent of hearing loss. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25:884–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loke WH, Song SR (1991) Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals. Bull Psychon Soc 29:437–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomber SG, Meredith MA, Kral A (2010) Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nat Neurosci 13:1421. doi:10.1038/nn.2653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez A, Di Russo F, Anllo-Vento L, Hillyard SA (2001) Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1980–1998. doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00660-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merabet LB, Pascual-Leone A (2010) Neural reorganization following sensory loss: the opportunity of change. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:44–52

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musacchia G, Schroeder CE (2009) Neuronal mechanisms, response dynamics and perceptual functions of multisensory interactions in auditory cortex. Hear Res 258:72–79. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.06.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ, Lawson D (1987) Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task - an event-related potential and behavioural-study.2. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res 405:268–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ, Schmidt A, Kutas M (1983) Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res 266:127–132. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(83)91314-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noachtar S, Hashimoto T, Luders H (1993) Pattern visual-evoked potentials recorded from human occipital cortex with chronic subdural electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:435–446. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(93)90032-k

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C, Brigell M, Marmor MF, Tormene AP, Holder GE, Vaegan (2004) Visual evoked potentials standard (2004). Doc Ophthalmol 108:115–123. doi:10.1023/b:doop.0000036790.67234.22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Onofrj M, Fulgente T, Thomas A, Curatola L, Peresson M, Lopez L, Locatelli T, Martinelli V, Comi G (1995a) Visual evoked potentials generator model derived from different spatial frequency stimuli of visual field regions and magnetic resonance imaging coordinates of v1, v2, v3 areas in man. Int J Neurosci 83:213–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Onofrj M, Fulgente T, Thomas A, Malatesta G, Peresson M, Locatelli T, Martinelli V, Comi G (1995b) Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of vep generators. Brain Topogr 7:217–231. doi:10.1007/bf01202381

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Marqui RD (2002) Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sloreta): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 24:5–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pavani F, Bottari D (2011) Visual abilities in individuals with profound deafness: a critical review. In: Murray MM, Wallace MT (eds) The neural bases of multisensory processes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 423–448

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ (2001) Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neuro-Otol 6:363–380. doi:10.1159/000046846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponton CW, Moore JK, Eggermont JJ (1999) Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scand Audiol 28:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rover J, Bach M (1985) Visual evoked-potentials to various check patterns. Doc Ophthalmol 59:143–147. doi:10.1007/bf00160610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jancke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M (2009) Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation. Brain 132:1967–1979. doi:10.1093/brain/awp034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmann P, Dillier N, Eichele T, Meyer M, Kegel A, Pascual-Marqui RD, Marcar VL, Jancke L, Debener S (2012) Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users. Brain 135:555–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekihara K, Sahani M, Nagarajan SS (2005) Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for meg source reconstruction. Neuroimage 25:1056–1067. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz H, Volkmann J, Jancke L, Freund HJ (1991) Anatomical left-right asymmetry of language-related temporal cortex is different in left-handers and right-handers. Ann Neurol 29:315–319. doi:10.1002/ana.410290314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zemon V, Ratliff F (1982) Visual evoked-potentials - evidence for lateral interactions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA Biol Sci 79:5723–5726. doi:10.1073/pnas.79.18.5723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Georg Christoph Lichtenberg stipend of the federal state of Lower Saxony (Germany) to Nadine Hauthal, the PhD-Programme “Function and pathophysiology of the auditory system” and the Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all”, Task Group 7.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Hauthal.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 291 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hauthal, N., Thorne, J.D., Debener, S. et al. Source Localisation of Visual Evoked Potentials in Congenitally Deaf Individuals. Brain Topogr 27, 412–424 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0341-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0341-7

Keywords

Navigation