Skip to main content
Log in

A Reliable Statistical Method to Detect Eyeblink-Artefacts from Electroencephalogram Data Only

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For data preprocessing and artefact removal in an ERP experiment we were confronted with the question how blink artefacts can be detected reliably, even in the absence of usable electrooculogram (EOG) data. We propose an objective and quantitative method for the automatic detection of eyeblink artefacts from raw data using extreme value statistics, with a p-value acting as a threshold parameter. For testing the method, we used 29 channel electroencephalogram recordings of 55 healthy subjects. A total 7,700 s of EEG were analysed. The proposed method was found to detect blink artefacts reliably, showing that extreme value statistics can be employed to detect blink artefacts, even in the absence of EOG recordings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is the case for a uniform distribution, for example, but not for an amplifier running into saturation.

  2. The pROC-software issued a warning about possible unexpected results with different specificity levels, but we see currently no method to evaluate their correctness as the manual offers only a short explanation but no solution to the problem.

References

  • Anderer P, Roberts S, Schlögl A, Gruber G, Klösch G, Herrmann W, Rappelsberger P, Filz O, Barbanoj M, Dorffner G, Saletu B (1999) Artifact processing in computerized analysis of sleep EEG—a review. Neuropsychobiology 40:150–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berg P (1986) The residual after correcting event-related potentials for blink artifacts. Psychophysiology 23(3):354–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croft R, Barry R (2000) Removal of ocular artifact from the EEG: a review. Neurophysiol Clin 30(1):5–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton JW, Bateman D, Hauberg S (2008) GNU octave manual version 3. Network Theory Limited, London

  • Elul R (1969) Gaussian behavior of the electroencephalogram: changes during performance of mental task. Sci 164(3877):328–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Yang Y, Lin P, Wang P, Zheng C (2010) Automatic removal of eye-movement and blink artifacts from EEG signals. Brain Topogr 23:105–114. doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0131-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser T, Sroka L, Möcks J (1986) The correction of EOG artifacts by frequency dependent and frequency independent methods. Psychophysiology 23(6):704–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghandeharion H, Erfanian A (2010) A fully automatic ocular artifact suppression from EEG data using higher order statistics: improved performance by wavelet analysis. Med Eng Phys 32:720–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girton D, Kamiya J (1973) A simple on-line technique for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 34(2):212–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 55(4):468–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel E (2004) Statistics of extremes. Dover books on mathematics. Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard SA, Galambos R (1970) Eye movement artifact in the CNV. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 28(2):173–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Falkenstein M (2008) The correction of eye blink artefacts in the EEG: a comparison of two prominent methods. PLoS ONE 3(8):e3004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ille N, Berg P, Scherg M (2002) Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies. J Clin Neurophysiol 19(2):113–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CA, Gorodnitsky IF, Kutas M (2004) Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation. Psychophysiology 41(2):313–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jung T-P, Humphries C, Lee T-W, Makeig S, Mckeown M, Iragui V, Sejnowski T (1998) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts: comparison between ICA and PCA. In: Neural networks for signal processing VIII, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE signal processing cociety workshop, pp 63–72

  • Jung T-P, Makeig S, Humphries C, Lee T-W, McKeown MJ, Iragui V, Sejnowski TJ (2000) Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37(2):163–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawabata N (1976) Test of statistical stability of the electroencephalogram. Biol Cybern 22:235–238. doi:10.1007/BF00365089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenemans JL, Molenaar PC, Verbaten MN, Slangen JL (1991) Removal of the ocular artifact from the EEG: a comparison of time and frequency domain methods with simulated and real data. Psychophysiology 28(1):114–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz S, Nadarajah S (2000) Extreme value distributions. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lins O, Picton T, Berg P, Scherg M (1993) Ocular artifacts in recording eegs and event-related potentials ii: source dipoles and source components. Brain Topogr 6:65–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  • Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12:77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlögl A, Keinrath C, Zimmermann D, Scherer R, Leeb R, Pfurtscheller G (2007) A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clin Neurophysiol 118(1):98–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skrandies W, Shinoda H (2012) Topographical changes of ERPs related to human semantic learning. Int J Psychophysiol 85(3):337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugimoto H, Ishii N, Iwata A, Suzumura N, Tomita T (1978) On the stationarity and normality of the electroencephalographic data during sleep stages. Comput Progr Biomed 8(3–4):224–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verleger R (1993) Valid identification of blink artefacts: are they larger than 50 μv in EEG records?. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 87(6):354–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vigário RN (1997) Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 103(3):395–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallstrom GL, Kass RE, Miller A, Cohn JF, Fox NA (2004) Automatic correction of ocular artifacts in the EEG: a comparison of regression-based and component-based methods. Int J Psychophysiol 53(2):105–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Benjamin Würzer for helping with data recording and visually screening the EEG data for artefacts. All computations for this article were performed with the following free open source software packages: GNU-Octave (Eaton et al. 2008), pROC (Robin et al. 2011), and GNU-R (R Development Core Team 2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, A., Skrandies, W. A Reliable Statistical Method to Detect Eyeblink-Artefacts from Electroencephalogram Data Only. Brain Topogr 26, 558–568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0281-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0281-2

Keywords

Navigation