Summary:
Median nerve electrical stimulation (MNES) produces early and strong averaged magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) signals, despite considerable single trial (ST) variability, demonstrated in separate MEG and EEG studies. Here, simultaneous MEG/EEG recordings are used to assess whether same or different aspects of ST variability are influencing EEG and MEG. Clustering techniques provided groupings for the ST timeseries for cortical responses to MNES derived from one modality. These groupings were applied to the corresponding ST timeseries derived from the other modality to quantify the similarity in variability captured by MEG and EEG signals. Estimates of early cortical activity elicited by MNES derived from MEG and EEG signals were very similar, provided ongoing mu rhythm was removed. Similarity between EEG and MEG estimates included both results based on average signals and measures of ST variability. Either MEG or EEG can provide a robust measure of the early cortical activity elicited by MNES as well as of its variability. Reliable indices of early cortical responses to MNES can be derived from either MEG or EEG data. These indices can be based on average signals, as is routinely done with clinical EEG, but it could also rely on hitherto little utilized measures of ST variability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Wood, C.C., Darcey, T.M., Spencer, D.D. and Williamson, P.D. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. J. Neurophysiol., 1989, 62: 694–710.
Arezzo, J.C., Vaughan, H.G. and Legatt, A.D. Topography and intra-cranical sources of somatosensory evoked-potentials in the monkey .2. Cortical Components. EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1981, 51: 1–18.
Balzamo, E., Marquis, P., Chauvel, P. and Regis, J. Short-latency components of evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation recorded by intracerebral electrodes in the human pre- and postcentral areas. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2004, 115: 1616–1623.
Barba, C., Valeriani, M., Colicchio, G., Tonali, P. and Restuccia, D. Parietal generators of low- and high-frequency MN (median nerve) SEPs: data from intracortical human recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2004, 115: 647–657.
Baumgartner, C., Sutherling, W.W., Sho, D. and Barth, D.S. Spatiotemporal modeling of cerebral evoked magnetic fields to median nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 79: 27–35.
Bell, J. and Sejnowski, T.J. An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput., 1995, 7: 1004–1034.
Bezdek, J.C. A convergence theorem for the fuzzy ISODATA clustering algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., 1980, PAMI-2 1: 1–8.
Brandt, M.E. Visual and auditory evoked phase resetting of the alpha EEG. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1997, 26: 285–298.
Buchner, H., Fuchs, M., Wischmann, H.A., Dossel, O., Ludwig, I., Knepper, A. and Berg, P. Source analysis of median nerve and finger stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials: multichannel simultaneous recording of electric and magnetic fields combined with 3D-MR tomography. Brain Topogr., 1994, 6: 299–310.
Chen, Z.Y., Wong, H.K. and Chan, Y.H. Variability of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery. J. Spinal Disord. Tech., 2004, 17(6): 470–476.
Cheyne, D., Gaetz, W., Garnero, L., Lachaux, J.P., Ducorps, A., Schwartz, D. and Varela, F.J. Neuromagnetic imaging of cortical oscillations accompanying tactile stimulation. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 2003, 17: 599–611.
Ferree, T.C., Eriksen, K.J. and Tucker, D.M. Regional head tissue conductivity estimation for improved EEG analysis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2000, 47: 1584–1592.
Gaetz, W.C. and Cheyne, D.O. Localization of human somatosensory cortex using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography. Neurosci. Lett., 2003, 340: 161–164.
Golub, G.H. and Charles, V.L. Matrix Computations. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Goncalves, S., de Munck, J.C., Verbunt, J.P., Heethaar, R.M. and da Silva, F.H. In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2003, 50: 1124–1128.
Gross, J. and Ioannides, A.A. Linear transformations of data space in MEG. Phys. Med. Biol., 1999, 44: 2081–2097.
Haig, A.R., Gordon, E., Rogers, G. and Anderson, J. Classification of single-trial ERP sub-types: application of globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 94: 288–297.
Hari, R., Reinikainen, K., Kaukoranta, E., Hamalainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Penttinen, A., Salminen, J. and Teszner, D. Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 57: 254–263.
Hari, R. and Forss, N. Magnetoencephalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 1999, 354: 1145–1154.
Ioannides, A.A., Bolton, J.P.R. and Clarke, C.J.S. Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Probl., 1990, 6: 523–542.
Ioannides, A.A. Real time human brain function: observations and inferences from single trial analysis of magnetoencephalographic signals. Clin. Electroencephalogr., 2001, 32: 98–111.
Ioannides, A.A., Kostopoulos, G.K., Laskaris, N.A., Liu, L., Shibata, T., Schellens, M., Poghosyan, V. and Khurshudyan, A. Timing and connectivity in the human somatosensory cortex from single trial mass electrical activity. Hum. Brain Mapp., 2002, 15: 231–246.
Ioannides, A.A., Poghosyan, V. Dammers, J. and Streit, M. Real-time activity and connectivity in healthy individuals and schizophrenic patients. NeuroImage, 2004, 23: 473–482.
Jansen, B.H., Agarwal, G., Hegde, A. and Boutros, N.N. Phase synchronization of the ongoing EEG and auditory EP generation. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2003, 114: 79–85.
Jung, T.P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T.W., McKeown, M.J., Iragui, V. and Sejnowski, T.J. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 2000, 37: 163–178.
Jung, T.P., Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E. and Sejnowski, T.J. Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials. Hum. Brain Mapp., 2001, 14: 166–185.
Kakigi, R. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation. Neurosci. Res., 1994, 20: 165–174.
Komssi, S., Huttunen, J., Aronen, H.J. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2004, 115: 534–542.
Krings, T., Chiappa, K.H., Cuffin, B.N., Cochius, J.I., Connolly, S. and Cosgrove, G.R. Accuracy of EEG dipole source localization using implanted sources in the human brain. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1999, 110: 106–114.
Laskaris, N.A. and Ioannides, A.A. Exploratory data analysis of evoked response single trials based on minimal spanning tree. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2001, 112: 698–712.
Laskaris, N.A., Liu, L.C. and Ioannides, A.A. Single-trial variability in early visual neuromagnetic responses: an explorative study based on the regional activation contributing to the N70m peak. Neuroimage, 2003, 20: 765–783.
Lehmann, D. Principles of spatial analysis. In: A.S. Gevins, A. Remond (Eds.), Handbook of Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, revised series, Vol. 1. Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987: 309–354.
Liu, A.K., Dale, A.M. and Belliveau, J.W. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Hum. Brain Mapp., 2002, 16: 47–62.
Liu, E.H., Wong, H.K., Chia, C.P., Lim, H.J., Chen, Z.Y. and Lee, T.L. Effects of isoflurane and propofol on cortical somatosensory evoked potentials during comparable depth of anaesthesia as guided by bispectral index. Br. J. Anaesth., 2005, 94(2): 193–197.
Liu, L. and Ioannides, A.A. A correlation study of averaged and single trial MEG signals: the average describes multiple histories each in a different set of single trials. Brain Topogr., 1996, 8: 385–396.
Luders, H., Dinner, D.S., Lesser, R.P. and Morris, H.H. Evoked potentials in cortical localization. J. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 3: 75–84.
Lutz, A., Lachaux, J.P., Martinerie, J. and Varela, F.J. Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2002, 99: 1586–1591.
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E. and Sejnowski, T.J. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science, 2002, 295: 690–694.
Mast, J. and Victor, J.D. Fluctuations of steady-state VEPs: interaction of driven evoked potentials and the EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 389–401.
Mauguiere, F., Merlet, I., Forss, N., Vanni, S., Jousmaki, V., Adeleine, P. and Hari, R. Activation of a distributed somatosensory cortical network in the human brain. A dipole modelling study of magnetic fields evoked by median nerve stimulation. Part I: Location and activation timing of SEF sources. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1997, 104: 281–289.
Mauguiere, F. and Desmedt, J.E. Focal capsular vascular lesions can selectively deafferent the prerolandic or the parietal cortex: somatosensory evoked potentials evidence. Ann. Neurol., 1991, 30: 71–75.
Mazzini, L. Clinical applications of event-related potentials in brain injury. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am., 2004, 15(1): 163–175.
Moradi, F., Liu, L.C., Cheng, K., Waggoner, R.A., Tanaka, K. and Ioannides, A.A. Consistent and precise localization of brain activity in human primary visual cortex by MEG and fMRI. Neuroimage, 2003, 18: 595–609.
Mosher, J.C., Leahy, R.M. and Lewis, P.S. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1999, 46: 245–259.
Nikouline, V.V., Wikstrom, H., Linkenkaer-Hansen, K., Kesaniemi, M., Ilmoniemi, R.J. and Huttunen, J. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields: relation to pre-stimulus mu rhythm. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2000, 111: 1227–1233.
Pal, N.R. and Bezdek, J.C. On cluster validity for the Fuzzy c-Means model. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 1995, 3: 370–379.
Papakostopoulos, D. and Crow, H.J. Direct recording of the somatosensory evoked potentials from the cerebral cortex of man and the difference between precentral and postcentral potentials. In: J.E. Desmedt (Ed.), Clinical Uses of Cerebral Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, Prog. Clin. Neurophysiology, Vol. 7. Basel: Karger, 1980: 15–26.
Peterson, N.N., Schroeder, C.E. and Arezzo, J.C. Neural generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in the awake monkey. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1995, 96: 248–260.
Pizzella, V., Tecchio, F., Romani, G.L. and Rossini, P.M. Functional localization of the sensory hand area with respect to the motor central gyrus knob. Neuroreport, 1999, 10: 3809–3814.
Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. and Vetterling, W.T. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Ramze Rezaee, M., Lelieveldt, B.P.F. and Reiber, J.H.C. A new cluster validity index for the fuzzy c-mean. Pattern Recognition Lett., 1998, 19: 237–246.
Rodionov, V., Goodman, C., Fisher, L., Rosenstein, G.Z. and Sohmer, H. A new technique for the analysis of background and evoked EEG activity: time and amplitude distributions of the EEG deflections. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2002, 113: 1412–1422.
Rousseeuw, P.J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 1987, 20: 53–65.
Salenius, S., Schnitzler, A., Salmelin, R., Jousmaki, V. and Hari, R. Modulation of human cortical rolandic rhythms during natural sensorimotor tasks. Neuroimage, 1997, 5: 221–228.
Seitz, R.J., Butefisch, C.M., Kleiser, R. and Homberg, V. Reorganisation of cerebral circuits in human ischemic brain disease. Restor Neurol. Neurosci., 2004, 22(3–5): 207–229.
Tang, A.C., Pearlmutter, B.A., Malaszenko, N.A. and Phung, D.B. Independent components of magnetoencephalography: single-trial response onset times. Neuroimage, 2002, 17: 1773–1789.
Tiihonen, J., Hari, R. and Hämäläinen, M. Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol./Evoked Potentials, 1989, 74: 290–296.
Tripp, J.H. Physical concepts and mathematical models. In: S.J. Williamson, G.L. Romani, L. Kaufman and I. Modena (Eds.), Biomagnetism: An Interdisciplinary Approach. New York: Plenum, 1983: 101–139.
Van Veen, B.D., Van Dronglen, W., Yuchtman, M. and Suzuki, A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1997, 44: 867–880.
Vanni, S., Rockstroh, B. and Hari, R. Cortical sources of human short-latency somatosensory evoked fields to median and ulnar nerve stimuli. Brain Res., 1996, 737: 25–33.
Vigario, R., Sarela, J., Jousmaki V., Hamalainen, M. and Oja, E. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 2000, 47: 589–593.
Wood, C.C., Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yarita, M. and Allison, T. Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: Identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. Science, 1985, 227: 1051–1053.
Xie, L.X. and Beni, G. Validity measure for fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans. Pat. Ana. Mach. Intell., 1991, 3: 841–847.
Zouridakis, G., Jansen, B.H. and Boutros, N.N. A fuzzy clustering approach to EP estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1997, 44: 673–680.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zainea, O., Kostopoulos, G. & Ioannides, A. Clustering of Early Cortical Responses to Median Nerve Stimulation from Average and Single Trial MEG and EEG Signals. Brain Topogr 17, 219–236 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-005-6031-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-005-6031-3