Abstract
Large-eddy simulation is a formidable method for predicting winds around complex terrain, but predictions can be highly dependent on the lateral boundary conditions used in the computations. When periodic boundary conditions are not an option because of terrain complexity, inflow and outflow boundary conditions must be adopted. A common practice in micro-scale wind simulations with incompressible flow solvers is to orient the terrain such that the incoming wind is always orthogonal to the inflow face and impose constant pressure outlet boundary conditions on a flat terrain far away from the region of interest. However, terrain reorientation becomes computationally expensive to ingest meandering winds as inflow. In the present work, we demonstrate shortcomings of this existing practice when oblique inflow angle is imposed at the inlet faces. To address these shortcomings, we pursue a Neumann-type pressure boundary condition at the outflow boundaries with a global mass conservation correction step on the momentum field. Additionally, we revise the so-called box perturbation method to generate evenly distributed turbulence at inlet faces with oblique inflow direction. We use the canonical channel flow, the Perdigão terrain, and the Askervein hill examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed fixes. The major benefits of our proposed approach are savings in computational cost due to the ability to use a smaller simulation domain and elimination of laborious terrain reorientation and tapering, and mesh generation steps for every new wind direction. We expect our approach to be beneficial, particularly, for model-chain approaches for arbitrarily complex terrain simulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data sets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abdallah S, Dreyer J (1988) Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions for the pressure Poisson equation of incompressible flow. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 8(9):1029–1036
Blosch E, Shyy W, Smith R (1993) The role of mass conservation in pressure-based algorithms. Numer Heat Transf B Fundam 24(4):415–429
Chorin AJ (1968) Numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Math Comput 22(104):745
DeLeon R, Jacobsen D, Senocak I (2013) Large-eddy simulations of turbulent incompressible flows on GPU clusters. Comput Sci Eng 15(1):26–33
DeLeon R, Sandusky M, Senocak I (2018) Simulations of turbulent flow over complex terrain using an immersed-boundary method. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 167(3):399–420
DeLeon R, Umphrey C, Senocak I (2019) Turbulent inflow generation through buoyancy perturbations with colored noise. AIAA J 57(2):532–542
Dhunny AZ, Lollchund MR, Rughooputh SDDV (2017) Wind energy evaluation for a highly complex terrain using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Renew Energy 101:1–9
Diebold M, Higgins C, Fang J, Bechmann A, Parlange MB (2013) Flow over hills: a large-eddy simulation of the Bolund case. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148(1):177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9807-0
Dong S, Karniadakis GE, Chryssostomidis C (2014) A robust and accurate outflow boundary condition for incompressible flow simulations on severely-truncated unbounded domains. J Comput Phys 261:83–105
Fernando HJS, Mann J, Palma JMLM, Lundquist JK, Barthelmie RJ, Belo-Pereira M, Brown WOJ, Chow FK, Gerz T, Hocut CM et al (2019) The Perdigão: peering into microscale details of mountain winds. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 100(5):799–819
Gresho PM, Sani RL (1987) On pressure boundary conditions for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 7(10):1111–1145
Jacobsen DA, Senocak I (2011) A full-depth amalgamated parallel 3D geometric multigrid solver for GPU clusters. In: 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Jacobsen DA, Senocak I (2013) Multi-level parallelism for incompressible flow computations on GPU clusters. Parallel Comput 39(1):1–20
Mehta D, Zuijlen AV, Koren B, Holierhoek J, Bijl H (2014) Large eddy simulation of wind farm aerodynamics: a review. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod 133:1–17
Meneveau C, Lund TS, William HC (1996) A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J Comput Phys 319:353–385
Mickle RE, Cook NJ, Hoff AM, Jensen NO, Salmon JR, Taylor PA, Tetzlaff G, Teunissen HW (1988) The Askervein Hill Project: vertical profiles of wind and turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 43(1):143–169
Mohd-Yusof J (1997) Combined immersed-boundary/b-spline methods for simulations of flow in complex geometries. Cent Turbul Res Annu Res Briefs 161(1):317–327
Muñoz-esparza D, Kosovic B, Van Beeck J, Mirocha J (2015) A stochastic perturbation method to generate inflow turbulence in large-eddy simulation models: application to neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layers. Phys Fluids 27(3):035102
Munters W, Meneveau C, Meyers J (2016) Shifted periodic boundary conditions for simulations of wall-bounded turbulent flows. Phys Fluids 28(2):025112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941912
Prandtl L (1925) Bemerkungen über die Entstehung der Turbulenz. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech/Z Angew Math Mech 1(6):431–436
Ryan SD, Ripley RC (2020) A geometric multigrid treatment of immersed boundaries for simulating atmospheric dispersion in complex urban environments. Atmos Environ 237(117):685
Salmon JR, Bowen AJ, Hoff AM, Johnson R, Mickle RE, Taylor PA, Tetzlaff G, Walmsley JL (1988) The Askervein Hill Project: mean wind variations at fixed heights above ground. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 43(3):247–271
Sani RL, Gresho PM (1994) Résumé and remarks on the open boundary condition minisymposium. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 18(10):983–1008
Senocak I, Ackerman AS, Stevens DE, Mansour NN (2004) Topography modeling in atmospheric flows using the immersed boundary method. 2004 Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames/Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA, pp 331–341
Senocak I, Ackerman AS, Kirkpatrick MP, Stevens DE, Mansour NN (2007) Study of near-surface models for large-eddy simulations of a neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124(3):405–424
Senocak I, Sandusky M, DeLeon R, Wade D, Felzien K, Budnikova M (2015) An immersed boundary geometric preprocessor for arbitrarily complex terrain and geometry. J Atmos Ocean Technol 32(11):2075–2087. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00023.1
Shyy W (1987) Effects of open boundary on incompressible Navier–Stokes flow computation: numerical experiments. Numer Heat Transf Part A Appl 12(2):157–178
Shyy W (1994) Computational modeling for fluid flow and interfacial transport. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81760-0.50011-3
Silva Lopes A, Palma JMLM, Castro FA (2007) Simulation of the Askervein flow. Part 2: large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125(1):85–108
Taylor PA, Teunissen HW (1985) The Askervein Hill Project: Report on the Sept./Oct. 1983
Taylor PA, Teunissen HW (1987) The Askervein Hill project: overview and background data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 39(1):15–39
Thibault JC, Senocak I (2012) Accelerating incompressible flow computations with a Pthreads-CUDA implementation on small-footprint multi-GPU platforms. J Supercomput 59(2):693–719
Umphrey C, Senocak I (2016) Turbulent inflow generation for the large-eddy simulation technique through globally neutral buoyancy perturbations. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut, vol 0
Walmsley JL, Taylor PA (1996) Boundary-layer flow over topography: impacts of the Askervein study. Springer
Wu W, Lynch AH, Rivers A (2005) Estimating the uncertainty in a regional climate model related to initial and lateral boundary conditions. J Clim 18(7):917–933
Wu X (2017) Inflow turbulence generation methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 49(1):23–49
Wu X, Moin P (2009) Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 630:5–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112009006624
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, TH., Senocak, I. Lateral Boundary Conditions for Complex Terrain Wind Simulations with Oblique Inflow Direction. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 187, 567–590 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-023-00786-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-023-00786-1