Abstract
This article takes up the project of studying psychological categories as homologies. Ethologists have numerous theoretical ideas concerning the phylogeny and ontogeny of behavioral homologies. They also have well-developed operational methods for testing behavioral homologies. Many of these theoretical ideas and operational criteria can be applied to psychological homologies. This paper suggests that insights from ethology should be incorporated in adaptationist and functionalist approaches to psychology. Doing so would strengthen those approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abouheif E (1999) Establishing homology criteria for regulatory gene networks: prospects and challenges. In: Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) 1999, Homology. John Wiley, New York, pp 207–221
Alcock J (2003) A textbook history of animal behavior. Animal Behav 65:3–10
Atran S (2005) Adaptationism for human cognition: strong, spurious or weak? Mind Language 20:39–67
Bateson P (2001) Where does our behavior come from? J Biosci 26:561–570
Bateson P (2003) The promise of behavioral biology. Animal Behav 65:11–17
Bateson P (2004) The origins of human differences. Daedalus 133(4):36–46
Bickle J (2006) Multiple realizability. In Zalta E (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/multiple-realizability
Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) (1999) Homology. John Wiley, New York
Boyd R, Silk J (2000) How humans evolved, 2nd edn. Norton, New York
Brigandt I (2003) Homology in comparative, molecular, and evolutionary developmental biology: the radiation of a concept. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 299B:9–17
Burian R (1992) Adaptation: historical perspectives. In: Keller E, Lloyd E (eds) Keywords in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 7–12
Burkhardt R (2005) Patterns of behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the founding of ethology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Carroll S (2005) Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of Evo Devo. Norton, New York
Cracraft J (2005) Phylogeny and Evo-Devo: characters, homology, and the historical analysis of the evolution of development. Zoology 108:345–356
Ereshefsky M (2001) The poverty of the linnaean hierarchy: a philosophical study of biological taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ghiselin M (2005) Homology as a relation of correspondence between parts of individuals. Theory Biosci 124:91–103
Gottlieb G (2001) A developmental psychobiological systems view: early formulation and current status. In: Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 41–54
Gottlieb G, Lickliter R (2004) The various roles of animal models in understanding human development. Soc Dev 4:311–325
Greene H (1994) Homology and behavioral repertories. In: Hall B (ed) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 370–393
Greene H (1999) Natural history and behavioral homology. In: Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) Homology. John Wiley, New York, pp 173–182
Griffiths PE (1994) Cladistic classification and functional explanation. Philos Sci 61:206–227
Griffiths PE (1996) The historical turn in the study of adaptation. Brit J Philos Sci 47:511–532
Griffiths PE (1997) What emotions really are: the problem of psychological categories. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Griffiths PE (2007) Evo-Devo meets the mind: towards a developmental evolutionary psychology. In: Sansom R, Brandon R (eds) Integrating evolution and development: from theory to practice. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hall BK (ed) (1994) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego
Hall BK (2003) Descent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biol Rev 78:409–433
Jablonka E, Lamb M (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Johnston T (2001) Toward a systems view of development: an appraisal of Lehrman’s critique of Lorenz. In: Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 15–24
Lauder G (1994) Homology, form, and function. In: Hall B (ed) Homology: the hierarchical basis of comparative biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 151–196
Lehrman D (1953) A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior. Quarter Rev Biol28:337–363. Reprinted in Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 25–40
Matthen M (1998) Biological universals and the nature of fear. J Philos XVC (3):105–132
Matthen M (2000) What is a hand? What is a mind? Revue Internationale de Philosophie 214:653–672
Matthen M (2002) Human rationality and the unique origin constraint. In: Ariew A, Cummins R, Perlman M (eds) Functions: new essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 341–372
Müller G (2003) Homology: the evolution of morphological organization. In: Müller G, Newman S (eds) Origination of organismal form: beyond the gene in developmental and evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 52–69
Patterson C (1982) Morphological characters and homology. In: Joysey K, Friday A (eds) Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic Press, London, pp 21–74
Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. Norton, New York
Raff R (1996) The shape of nature: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Remane A (1952) Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest und Portig, Leipzig
Richards R (1987) Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Richardson R (2007) The adaptive programme of evolutionary psychology. In: Thagard P (ed) The philosophy of psychology and cognitive science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 369–428
Sterelny K (2003) Thought in a hostile world: the evolution of human cognition. Blackwell, Oxford
Sterelny K, Griffiths P (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Striedter G, Northcutt G (1999) Biological hierarchies and the concept of homology. Brain Behav Evol 38:177–189
Tooby J, Cosmides L (1992) The psychological foundation of culture. In: Barkow J, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 19–136
Tudge C (2000) The variety of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Wagner G (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am Zool 36:36–43
Wagner G (1999) A research programme for testing the biological homology concept. In: Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) Homology. John Wiley, New York, pp 125–134
Wagner G (ed) (2001) The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, London
Wagner G (2007) The developmental genetics of homology. Nat Rev Genet 8:473–479
Wenzel J (1992) Behavioral homology and phylogeny. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23:361–381
Wenzel J (1993) Application of the biogenetic law to behavioral ontogeny: a test using nest architecture in paper wasps. J Evol Biol 6:229–247
Acknowledgements
My thanks to Ingo Brigandt, David Buller, Stephen Downes, Paul Griffiths, David Hull, Alan Love, and Elliott Sober for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Financial support was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Calgary Institute for the Humanities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ereshefsky, M. Psychological categories as homologies: lessons from ethology. Biol Philos 22, 659–674 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9091-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-007-9091-9