Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scaling microbial biomass, metabolism and resource supply

  • Synthesis and Emerging Ideas
  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The microbiome concept has drawn attention to the complex signal and syntrophic networks that underlie microbial community organization. This self-organization may lead to patterns in the allometric scaling of microbial community metabolism that differ from those of macrobial communities. Using meta-analyses, we analyzed the power scaling relationships between community production, respiration, extracellular enzyme activity and biomass for bacteria and fungi across aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The scaling exponents for community production versus biomass for fungi and bacteria were 0.85 ± 0.06 (95 % CI) and 0.72 ± 0.07, respectively. The scaling exponent for fungal respiration versus production was 0.61 ± 0.06. Previous studies reported exponents of 0.41, 0.44 and 0.58 for bacterial respiration versus production. Carbon use efficiency increased with biomass for both fungi and bacteria with an exponent of 0.27 ± 0.06. The potential activities of four widely measured extracellular enzymes were directly related to community production with power scaling exponents of 1.0–1.2. The frequency distribution of biomass turnover times (median 112 h for bacteria and 1,128 h for fungi) overlapped substantially with those for environmental substrate turnover, presented in a prior analysis of extracellular enzyme kinetics. These metabolic relationships, which have scaling exponents of 0.5, are linked by the ratio of assimilation to carbon use efficiency. This connection ties ecological stoichiometry and metabolic theory to microbial community homeostasis. At the ecosystem scale, allometry of microbial communities has similarities to that of eusocial insects but differs from that of plant communities, perhaps as a result of proto-cooperative processes that contribute to microbial community organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37:937–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azarra M, La Ferla R, Maimone G, Monticelli AS, Zacone R, Civitarese G (2012) Prokaryotic dynamics and heterotrophic metabolism in a deep convection site of Eastern Mediterranean Sea (the Southern Adriatic Pit). Cont Shelf Res 44:106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bääth E (1994) Thymidine and leucine incorporation in soil bacteria with different cell Size. Microb Ecol 27:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker PAHM, Berendsen RL, Doornbos RF, Wintermans PCA, Pieterse CMJ (2013) The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics. Front Plant Sci 4:article 165

  • Blankinship JC, Becerra CA, Schaeffer SM, Schimel JP (2014) Separating cellular metabolism from exoenzyme activity in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 71:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böer SI, Arnosti C, van Beusekom JEE, Boetius A (2009) Temporal variations in microbial activities and carbon turnover in subtidal sandy sediments. Biogeosciences 6:1149–1165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West BG (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MD, Suberkropp K (2004) Respiration and annual fungal production associated with decomposing leaf litter in two streams. Freshw Biol 49:1112–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo MM, Allan JD, Sinsabaugh RL, Kling GW (2004) The influence of seasonality and landscape characteristics on bacterial production in lowland rivers of the Orinoco basin. Freshw Biol 49:1400–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chróst RJ, Rai H (1993) Ectoenzyme activity and bacterial secondary production in nutrient-impoverished and nutrient-enriched freshwater mesocosms. Microb Ecol 25:131–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Chróst RJ, Riemann B (1994) Storm-stimulated enzymatic decomposition of organic matter in benthic/pelagic coastal mesocosms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 108:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007) C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85:235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappinscott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas LA, Egge JK, Thingstad TF, Topper B (2011) Organic carbon and mineral nutrient limitation of oxygen consumption, bacterial growth and efficiency in the Norwegian Sea. Polar Biol 34:871–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Giorgio PA, Cole JJ (1998) Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:503–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JP, Okie JG, Moses ME, Sibly RM, Brown JH (2010) Shifts in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evolutionary transitions of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:12941–12945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias S, Banin E (2012) Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:990–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T, Watts T, Hobbie SE, Fagan W, Schade J, Hood J, Sterner RW (2003) Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust K, Raes J (2012) Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:538–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay SEG (2014) Unpublished data from Hudson River NY. Available at http://www.caryinstitute.org/science-program/research-projects/hudson-river-ecosystem-study/hudson-river-ecosystem-study-data

  • Findlay S, Sinsabaugh RL (2003) Response of hyporheic biofilm bacterial metabolism and community structure to nitrogen amendments. Aquat Microb Ecol 33:127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay S, Sinsabaugh RL (2006) Stream microbial communities: a cross-regional comparison of metabolic function and community similarity. Microb Ecol 52:491–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay S, Sinsabaugh RL, Fischer DT, Franchini P (1998) Sources of dissolved organic carbon supporting planktonic bacterial production in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Ecosystems 1:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay SEG, Dye S, Kuehn KA (2002) Microbial growth and nitrogen retention in litter of Phragmites australis compared to Typha angustifolia. Wetlands 22:616–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay S, Sinsabaugh RL, Sobczak W, Hoostal M (2003) Metabolic and structural response of hyporheic bacterial communities to variations in supply of dissolved organic matter. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1608–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer H, Klope F, Wilzcek S, Pusch MT (2005) A river’s liver: microbial processes within the hyporheic zone of a large lowland river. Biogeochemistry 76:349–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman CM, Franchini P, Sinsabaugh RL (1998) The trophic dynamics of riverine bacterioplankton: relationships among substrate availability, ectoenzyme kinetics and growth. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1344–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco-Vidal L, Moran XAG (2011) Relationships between coastal bacterioplankton growth rates and biomass production: comparison of leucine and thymidine uptake with single-cell physiological characteristics. Environ Microbiol 61:328–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost PC, Benstead JP, Cross WF, Hillebrand H, Larson JH, Xenopoulos MA, Yoshida T (2006) Threshold elemental ratios of carbon and phosphorus in aquatic consumers. Ecol Lett 9:774–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M, Escribano R, Cuevas LA (2012) Bacterial response to a weak 2006 El Nino condition in an upwelling area of the Humboldt Current System. J Mar Biol Assoc 92:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajewski AJ, Chróst RJ (1995) Production and enzymatic decomposition of organic matter by microplankton in a eutrophic lake. J Plankton Res 17:709–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossart H-P, Simon M (2002) Bacterioplankton dynamics in the Gulf of Aqaba and the northern Red Sea in early spring. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 239:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulis V, Suberkropp K, Rosemond AD (2008) Comparison of fungal activities on wood and leaf litter in unaltered and nutrient-enriched headwater streams. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1094–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BH, Elonen CM, Anderson LE, Lehter JC (2014a) Microbial respiration and ecoenzyme activity in sediments from the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone. Aquat Microb Ecol 72:105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BH, Elonen CM, Jicha TM, Kolka RK, Lehto LLP, Sebestyen SD, Seifert-Monson LR (2014b) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial processing of organic matter in northern bogs and fens reveals a common P-limitation between peatland types. Biogeochemistry. doi:10.1007/s10533-014-9991-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang YL, Zeng YH, Yu ZL, Zhang J, Feng H, Lin XC (2013) In silico and experimental methods revealed highly diverse bacteria with quorum sensing and aromatics biodegradation systems—A potential broad application on bioremediation. Bioresour Technol 148:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inubushi K, Sakamoto K, Sawamoto T (2005) Properties of microbial biomass in acid soils and their turnover. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 51:605–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser C, Franklin O, Dieckmann U, Richter A (2014) Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay. Ecol Lett. doi:10.1111/ele.12269

    Google Scholar 

  • Karner M, Herndl GJ (1992) Extracellular enzymatic activity and secondary production in free-living and marine-snow associated bacteria. Mar Biol 113:341–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Karner M, Fuks D, Herndl GJ (1992) Bacterial activity along a trophic gradient. Microb Ecol 24:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrasch B, Ullrich S, Mehrens R, Zimmerman-Timm H (2003) Free and particle- associated extracellular enzyme activity and bacterial production in the lower Elbe estuary, Germany. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 31:297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhoff AJ, Enquist BJ (2006) Ecosystem allometry: the scaling of nutrient stocks and primary productivity across plant communities. Ecol Lett 9:419–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal RA, Olivier BG, Röling WFM, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ (2013) Community flux balance analysis for microbial consortia at balanced growth. PLoS One 8(5):e64567. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeberl M, Schmidt R, Ramadan EM, Bauer R, Berg G (2013) The microbiome of medicinal plants: diversity and importance for plant growth, quality, and health. Front Microbiol 4:article 400

  • Komínková D, Kuehn KA, Steiner D, Büsing N, Gessner MO (2000) Microbial biomass, growth, and respiration associated with submerged litter of Phragmites australis decomposing in a littoral reed stand of a large lake. Aquat Microb Ecol 22:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn KA, Lemke MJ, Suberkropp K, Wetzel RG (2000) Microbial biomass and production associated with decaying leaf litter of the emergent macrophyte Juncus effusus. Limnol Oceanogr 45:862–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn KA, Ohsowski BM, Francoeur SN, Neely RK (2011) Contributions of fungi to carbon flow and nutrient cycling from standing dead Typha angustifolia leaf litter in a temperate freshwater marsh. Limnol Oceanogr 56:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee ZM, Schmidt TM (2014) Bacterial growth efficiency varies in soils under different land management practices. Soil Biol Biochem 69:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maire V, Alvarez G, Colombet J, Comby A, Despinasse R, Dubreucq E, Joly M, Lehours A-C, Perrier V, Shahzad T, Fontaine S (2013) An unknown oxidative metabolism substantially contributes to soil CO2 emissions. Biogeosciences 10:1155–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manini E, Luna GM, Danovaro R (2004) Benthic bacterial response to variable estuarine water inputs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 50:185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Porporato A (2009) Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization: theory and models across scales. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1355–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A (2010) Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr 80:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, Porporato A, Ågren GI (2012) Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04225.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Garcia S, Fernandez E, Alvarez-Salgado X-A, Gonzalez J, Lonberg C, Maranon E, Moran XAG, Teira E (2010) Differential responses of phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria to organic and inorganic nutrient additions in coastal waters off the NW Iberian Peninsula. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 416:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead DL, Lashermes G, Sinsabaugh RL (2012) A theoretical model of C- and N-acquiring exoenzyme activities balancing microbial demands during decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 53:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori S, Yamaji K, Ishida A, Prokushkin SG, Masyagina OV, Hagihara A, Rafiqul Hoque ATM, Suwa R, Osawa A, Nishizono T, Ueda T, Kinjo M, Miyagi T, Kajimoto T, Koike T, Matsuura Y, Toma T, Zyryanov OA, Abaimov AP, Awaya Y, Araki MG, Kawasaki T, Chiba Y, Umari M (2010) Mixed-power scaling of whole-plant respiration from seedlings to giant trees. PNAS 107:1447–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murrell MC (2003) Bacterioplankton dynamics in a subtropical estuary: evidence for substrate limitation. Aquat Microb Ecol 32:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell SY, Fallon RD (1991) Toward a method for measuring instantaneous fungal growth rates in field samples. Ecology 72:1547–1559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell SY, Arsuffi TL, Palm LA (1996) Misting and nitrogen fertilization of shoots of a salt marsh grass: effects upon fungal decay of leaf blades. Oecologia 108:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rath J, Schiller C, Herndl GJ (1993) Ectoenzymatic activity and bacterial dynamics along a trophic gradient in the Caribbean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 102:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resat H, Bailey V, McCue LA, Konopka A (2012) Modeling microbial dynamics in heterogeneous environments: growth on soil carbon sources. Microb Ecol 63:883–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riemann L, Steward GF, Azam F (2000) Dynamics of bacterial community composition and activity during a mesocosm diatom bloom. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:578–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson C (2008) Heterotrophic bacterial respiration. In: Kirchman DJ (ed) Microbial ecology of the oceans, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 299–334

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Savage VM, Gillooly JF, Woodruff WH, West GB, Allen AP, Enquist BJ, Brown JH (2004) The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology. Funct Ecol 18:257–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage VM, Deeds EJ, Fontana W (2008) Sizing up allometric scaling theory. PLoS Comput Biol 4(9):e1000171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimel JP, Weintraub MN (2003) The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model. Soil Biol Biochem 35:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlickeisen E, Tietjen TE, Arsuffie TL, Groeger AW (2003) Detritus processing and microbial dynamics of an aquatic macrophyte and terrestrial leaf in a thermally constant, spring-fed stream. Microb Ecol 45:411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Findlay S (1995) Microbial production, enzyme activity and carbon turnover in surface sediments of the Hudson River Estuary. Microb Ecol 30:127–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Follstad Shah JJ (2012) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and ecological theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:313–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Moorhead DL (1994) Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production: a model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1305–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Findlay S, Franchini P, Fischer D (1997) Enzymatic analysis of riverine bacterioplankton production. Limnol Oceanogr 42:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ (2009) Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature 462:795–798

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Manzoni S, Moorhead DL, Richter A (2013) Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modeling. Ecol Lett. doi:10.1111/ele.12113

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Belnap J, Follstad Shah JJ, Hill BH, Kuske C, Litvak ME, Martinez N, Moorhead DL, Findlay SG, Kuehn KA, Warnock D (2014) Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability. Biogeochemistry 121:287–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siuda W, Chróst RJ (2002) Decomposition and utilization of particulate organic matter by bacteria in lakes of different trophic status. Pol J Environ Stud 11:53–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC, Simon M, Alldredge AL, Azam F (1992) Intense hydrolytic enzyme activity on marine aggregates and implications for rapid particle dissolution. Nature 359:139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland MS, McCulley RL, Bradford MA (2013) The effect of a quorum-quenching enzyme on leaf litter decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 64:65–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturluson M, Nielsen TG, Wassmann P (2008) Bacterial abundance, biomass and production during spring blooms in the northern Barents Sea. Deep Sea Res II 55:2186–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su R, Amonette R, Kuehn KA, Sinsabaugh RL, Neely RK (2007) Microbial dynamics associated with decaying Typha angustifolia litter in two contrasting Lake Erie coastal wetlands. Aquat Microb Ecol 46:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suberkropp K (2001) Fungal growth, production and sporulation during leaf decomposition in two streams. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5063–5068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suberkropp K, Gulis V, Rosemond AM, Benstead JP (2010) Ecosystem and physiological scales of microbial responses to nutrients in a detritus-based stream: results of a 5-year continuous enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 55:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Groenigen K-J, Bloem J, Bååth E, Boeckx P, Rousk J, Bode´ S, Forristal D, Jones MB (2010) Abundance, production and stabilization of microbial biomass under conventional and reduced tillage. Soil Biol Biochem 42:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters JS (2014) Theoretical and empirical perspectives on the scaling of supply and demand in social insect colonies. Entomol Exp Appl 150:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CJ, Boyer JN, Jochem FJ (2009) Microbial activity and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content in a subtropical seagrass estuary (Florida Bay): evidence for limited bacterial use of seagrass production. Mar Biol 156:341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CJ, Scott AB, Wilson HF, Xenopoulos MA (2012) Effects of land use on water column bacterial activity and enzyme stoichiometry in stream ecosystems. Aquat Sci 74:483–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang XL, Gao J, Ma AZ, Fu SL, Zhuang GQ (2013) Bioactive molecules in soil ecosystems: masters of the underground. Int J Mol Sci 5:8841–8868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ZoBell CE (1943) The effect of solid surfaces on bacterial activity. J Bacteriol 46:39–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

RLS acknowledges support from the NSF Ecosystem Sciences program (DEB-0918718) and the Sevilleta LTER Program. KAK acknowledges support from NSF (DEB-0315686, DBI-0420965, DBI-0521018) and the Michigan Sea Grant College Program (NA76RG0133) under NOAA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Sinsabaugh.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Cory Cleveland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinsabaugh, R.L., Shah, J.J.F., Findlay, S.G. et al. Scaling microbial biomass, metabolism and resource supply. Biogeochemistry 122, 175–190 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-0058-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-014-0058-z

Keywords

Navigation