Abstract
Flow-through aquifer columns were operated for 12 weeks to evaluate the benefits of aerobic biostimulation for the bioremediation of source-zone soil contaminated with chlorobenzenes (CBs). Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) was used to measure the concentration of total bacteria (16S rRNA gene) and oxygenase genes involved in the biodegradation of aromatic compounds (i.e., toluene dioxygenase, ring hydroxylating monooxygenase, naphthalene dioxygenase, phenol hydroxylase, and biphenyl dioxygenase). Monochlorobenzene, which is much more soluble than dichlorobenzenes, was primarily removed by flushing, and biostimulation showed little benefit. In contrast, dichlorobenzene removal was primarily due to biodegradation, and the removal efficiency was much higher in oxygen-amended columns compared to a control column. To our knowledge, this is the first report that oxygen addition can enhance CB source-zone soil bioremediation. Analysis by qPCR showed that whereas the biphenyl and toluene dioxygenase biomarkers were most abundant, increases in the concentration of the phenol hydroxylase gene reflected best the higher dichlorobenzene removal due to aerobic biostimulation. This suggests that quantitative molecular microbial ecology techniques could be useful to assess CB source-zone bioremediation performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CB:
-
Chlorobenzene
- DCB:
-
Dichlorobenzene
- DNAPL:
-
Dense non-aqueous phase liquid
- MCB:
-
Monochlorobenzene
- MCL:
-
Maximum contaminant level
- MNA:
-
Monitored natural attenuation
- qPCR:
-
quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
- rRNA:
-
ribosomal RNA
- VOC:
-
Volatile organic compounds
References
Abraham WR, Wenderoth DF, Glasser W (2005) Diversity of biphenyl degraders in a chlorobenzene polluted aquifer. Chemosphere 58:529–533
Adamson DT, McDade JM, Hughes JB (2003) Inoculation of DNAPL source-zone to initiate reductive dechlorination of PCE. Environ Sci Technol 37:2525–2533
Adrian L, Szewzyk U, Wecke J, Gorisch H (2000) Bacterial dehalorespiration with chlorinated benzenes. Nature 408:580–583
Alfreider A, Vogt C, Babel W (2002b) Expression of chlorocatechol 1,2-dioxygenase and chlorocatechol 2,3-dioxygenase genes in chlorobenzene-contaminated subsurface samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1372–1376
Alvarez PJJ, Illman W (2005) Bioremediation and natural attenuation of groundwater contaminants: process fundamentals and mathematical models. John Wiley & Sons
Balcke GU, Turunen LP, Geyer R, Wenderoth DF, Schlosser D (2004) Chlorobenzene biodegradation under consecutive aerobic–anaerobic conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49:109–120
Baldwin BR, Nakatsu CH, Nies L (2003) Detection and enumeration of aromatic oxygenase genes by multiplex and real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3350–3358
Beil S, Mason JR, Timmis KN, Pieper DH (1998) Identification of chlorobenzene dioxygenase sequence elements involved in dechlorination of 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene. J Bacteriol 180:5520–5528
Beller HR, Kane SR, Legler TC, Alvarez PJJ (2002) A real-time polymerase chain reaction method for monitoring anaerobic, hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria based on a catabolic gene. Environ Sci Technol 36:3977–3984
Cope N, Hughes JB (2001) Biologically-enhanced removal of PCE from NAPL source-zones. Environ Sci Technol 35:2014–2021
Da Silva MLB, Alvarez PJJ (2004) Enhanced anaerobic biodegradation of benzene-toluene-ethylbenzene-xylene-ethanol mixtures in bioaugmented aquifer columns. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4720–4726
Da Silva MLB, Daprato RC, Gomez DE, Hughes JB, Ward CH, Alvarez PJJ (2006) Comparison of bioaugmentation and biostimulation for the enhancement of DNAPLS source-zone bioremediation. Water Environ Res 78:2456–2465
Dermietzel J, Vieth A (2002) Chloroaromatics in groundwater: chances of bioremediation. Environ Geol 41:683–689
Futumata H, Harayama S, Watanabe K (2001) Group-specific monitoring of phenol hydroxylase genes for a functional assessment of phenol-stimulated TCE bioremediation. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4671–4677
Gibson DT, Parales RE (2000) Aromatic hydrocarbon dioxygenases in environmental biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:236–243
Howard PH (1989) Handbook of environmental fate and exposure data for organic chemicals. Lewis Publishers Chelsea, MI
Kao CM, Prosser J (1999) Intrinsic bioremediation of trichloroethylene and chlorobenzene: field and laboratory studies. J Hazard Mater B69:67–79
Kaschl A, Vogt C, Uhlig S, Nijenhuis I, Weiss H, Kastner M, Richnow HH (2005) Isotopic fractionation indicates anaerobic monochlorobenzene biodegradation. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1315–1324
Lendvay JM, Löffler FE, Dollhopf M, Aiello MR, Daniels G, Fathepure BZ, Gebhard M, Heine R, Helton R, Shi J, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Major CL, Barcelona MJ, Petrovskis E, Hickey R, Tiedje JM, Adriaens P (2003) Bioreactive barriers: a comparison of bioaugmentation and biostimulation for chlorinated solvent remediation. Environ Sci Technol 37:1422–1431
Lichstein HC, Soule MH (1943) Studies of the effect of sodium azide on microbic growth and respiration: I. The effect of sodium azide on microbic growth. University of Michigan
Lorbeer H, Starke S, Gozan M, Tiehm A, Werner P (2002) Bioremediation of chlorobenzene-contaminated groundwater on granular activated carbon barriers. Water, Air, Soil Pollut 2:183–193
McDade JM, McGuire TM, Newell CJ (2005) Analysis of DNAPL source-depletion costs at 36 field sites. Remediat J 15:9–18
McGuire TM, McDade JM, Newell CJ (2006) Performance of DNAPL source depletion technologies at 59 chlorinated solvent-impacted sites. Ground Water Monit Remediat 26:73–84
Sleep BE, Seepersad DJ, Mo K, Heidorn CM, Hrapovic L, Morril PL, McMAster ML, Hood ED, Lebron C, Lollar BS, Major DW, Edwars EA (2006) Biological enhancement of tetrachloroethene dissolution and associated microbial community changes. Environ Sci Technol 40:3623–3633
Suzuki MT, Taylor LT, DeLong EF (2000) Quantitative analysis of small-subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5′-nuclease assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4605–4614
Van der Meer JR, Werlen C, Nishino SF, Spain JC (1998) Evolution of a pathway for chlorobenzene metabolism leads to natural attenuation in contaminated groundwater. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4185–4193
Vogt C, Alfreider A, Lorbeer H, Ahlheim J, Feist B, Boehme O, Weiss H, Babel W, Wuensche L (2002) Two pilot plant reactors designed for the in situ bioremediation of chlorobenzene-contaminated ground water: hydrogeological and chemical characteristics and bacterial consortia. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 2:161–170
Vogt C, Alfreider A, Lorbeer H, Hoffmann D, Wuensche L, Babel W (2004) Bioremediation of chlorobenzene-contaminated ground water in an in situ reactor mediated by hydrogen peroxide. J Contam Hydrol 68:121–141
Wackett LP, Hershberger CD (2001) Biocatalysis and biodegradation. ASM Press, Washington
Wenderoth DF, Rosenbrock P, Abraham WR, Pieper DH, Hofle MG (2003) Bacterial community dynamics during biostimulation and bioaugmentation experiments aiming at chlorobenzene degradation in groundwater. Micro Ecol 46:161–176
Zheng YR, Carr CS, Hughes JB (2001) Influence of hydraulic retention time on extent of PCE dechlorination and preliminary characterization of the enrichment culture. Bioremediat J 5:169–168
Acknowledgements
This study was performed with private support in conjunction with facilities and resources of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Rice University. The authors thank Nathan Howell for providing laboratory and technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dominguez, R.F., da Silva, M.L.B., McGuire, T.M. et al. Aerobic bioremediation of chlorobenzene source-zone soil in flow-through columns: performance assessment using quantitative PCR. Biodegradation 19, 545–553 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-007-9160-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-007-9160-4