Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Artificial ponds increase local dragonfly diversity in a global biodiversity hotspot

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human demands have led to an increased number of artificial ponds for irrigation of crops year-round. Certain insect species have established in these ponds, including dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata). There has been discussion around the value of artificial ponds for encouraging dragonfly diversity, with little work in biodiversity hotspots rich in rare and endemic species. We focus here on the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) global biodiversity hotspot, which has many endemic dragonfly species but has few natural ponds. Yet it has many artificial ponds mostly used for irrigation on local farms. This leads to an interesting question: to what extent do these artificial ponds provide habitats for dragonflies in this biologically rich, agriculturally fragmented landscape? To answer this, we recorded dragonfly species richness and abundances from 17 artificial ponds and 13 natural stream deposition pools as reference, in an area of the CFR where there are no local, natural, perennial ponds. Thirteen environmental and physical variables were recorded at the ponds and pools. We found that although ponds attracted no rare or threatened dragonfly species, they increased the area of occupancy and population sizes of many generalist species. These came from nearby natural deposition pools or from unknown sources elsewhere in the region, so providing refuges which otherwise would not be there. Interestingly, some CFR endemic species were also recorded at our artificial ponds. Overall dragonfly assemblages and those of true dragonflies (Anisoptera) and damselflies (Zygoptera) differed between artificial ponds and deposition pools, suggesting that artificial ponds are to some extent a novel ecosystem. Habitat type, elevation and temperature were significant drivers in structuring overall species assemblages. For the Anisoptera, riparian vegetation and level of landscape connectivity was important, while temperature was not. In contrast, Zygoptera species were most affected by river catchment, habitat type and temperature. In sum, these artificial ponds are stepping stone habitats across an increasingly fragmented landscape. Managing these ponds with perennial water, constant water levels, and maximum complexity and heterogeneity of habitats in terms of vegetation will conserve a wide range of generalists and some specialists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angelibert S, Giani N (2003) Dispersal characteristics of three odonate species in a patchy habitat. Ecography 26:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apinda-Legnouo EA, Samways MJ, Simaika JP (2013) Value of artificial ponds for aquatic beetle and bug conservation in the cape floristic region biodiversity hotspot. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 24:525–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Axmacher JC, Holtmann G, Scheuermann L, Brehm G, Hohenstein K, Fiedler K (2004) Diversity of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Heometridae) along an Afrotropical elevational rainforest transect. Divers Distrib 10:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bella Della V, Bazzanti M, Chiarotti F (2005) Macroinvertebrate diversity and conservation status of Mediterranean ponds in Italy: water permanence and mesohabitat influence. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 15:583–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs J, Willams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Weatherby A (2005) 15 years of pond assessment in Britain: results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 15:693–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond P, Goldblatt P (1984) Plants of the cape flora: a descriptive catalogue. National Botanical Gardens of South Africa, Claremont

    Google Scholar 

  • Bried JT, Hager BJ, Hunt PD, Fox JN, Jensen HJ, Vowels KM (2012) Bias of reduced-effort community surveys for adult Odonata of lentic waters. Insect Cons Divers 5:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bried JT, Dillon AM, Hager BJ, Patten MA, Luttbeg B (2015) Criteria to infer local species residency in standardized adult dragonfly surveys. Freshw Sci 34:1105–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briers RA, Biggs JT (2005) Spatial patterns in pond invertebrate communities: separating environmental and distance effects. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 15:549–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carchini G, Di Domenico M, Pacione T, Solimini AG, Tanzilli C (2003) Species distribution and habitat features in lentic Odonata, Italy. J Zool 70:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark TE, Samways MJ (1996) Dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of biotype quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. J Appl Ecol 33:1001–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KF, Willson KH, Harvey IF, Thomas CJ, Sherratt TN (1999) Dispersal of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecogr 22:524–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell RK (2006) EstimateS 9.1.0. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS/. 3 Oct 2015

  • Cowell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosoph Trans R Soc Lon B 345:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico F, Darblade S, Avignon S, Blanc-Manel S, Ormerod SJ (2004) Odonates as indicators of shallow lake restoration by liming: comparing adult and larval responses. Restor Ecol 3:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies BR, Biggs J, Williams P, Whitfield M, Nicolet P, Sear D, Bray S, Maund S (2008) Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day J, Day B (2009) The endemic aquatic invertebrate fauna of the cape floristic realm: what does the future hold? In IOP Conf Ser. IOP Publishing. Earth Environ Sci 6:312015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco P, Nogueira DS, Correa CC, Vieira TB, Silva KD, Pinto NS, Bichsel D, Hirota ASV, Vieira RRS, Carneiro FM, de Oliveira AB, Carvalho P, Bastos RP, Ilg C, Oertli B (2014) Patterns in the organization of Cerrado pond biodiversity in Brazilian pasture landscapes. Hydrobiologia 723:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marco P, Batista JD, Cabette HSR (2015) Community assembly of adult odonates in tropical streams: an ecophysiological hypothesis. PLoS One 10:e0123023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declerck S, De Bie T, Ercken D, Hampel H, Schrijvers S, van Wichelen J, Gillard V, Mandiki R, Losson B, Bauwens D, Keijers S, Vyverman W, Goddeeris B, De Meester Brendonck L, Martens K (2006) Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biol Conserv 131:523–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Anaya JA, Novelo-Gutierrez R, Campbell WB (2011) Diversity and distribution of Odonata (Insecta) larvae along an altitudinal gradient in Coalcoman mountains, Michoacan, Mexico. J Trop Biol 59:1559–1577

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PBC, Samways MJ (2007) Montane refugia for endemic and Red Listed dragonflies in the Cape Floristic Region biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 16:787–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PBC, Samways MJ (2011) Micro-hotspot determination and buffer zone value for Odonata in a globally significant biosphere reserve. Biol Conserv 144:772–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harabiš F, Dolný A (2012) Human altered ecosystems: suitable habitats as well as ecological traps for dragonflies (Odonata): the matter of scale. J Insect Conserv 16:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms TM, Kinkead KE, Dinsmore SJ (2014) Evaluating the effects of landscape configuration on site occupancy and the movement dynamics of Odonates in Iowa. J Insect Conserv 18:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart LA, Bowker MB, Tarboton W, Downs CT (2014) Species composition, distribution and habitat types of Odonata in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and the associated conservation implications. PLoS One 9:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinden H, Oertli B, Menetrey N, Sager L, Lachavanne J-B (2005) Alpine pond biodiversity: what are the related environmental variables? Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 15:613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortal J, Borges PAV, Gaspar C (2006) Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. J Animal Ecol 75:274–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indermuehle N, Oertli B, Menetrey N, Sager L (2004) An overview of methods potentially suitable for pond biodiversity assessment. Arch Sci 57:121–130

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN 2015. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2015-3. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 6 Oct 2015

  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2016) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 12. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jocqué M, Martens K, Riddoch B, Brendonck L (2006) Faunistics of ephemeral rock pools in southeastern Botswana. Arch Hydrobiol 165:415–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juen H, Soares H, Cabette R, De Marco Jnr P (2007) Odonate assemblage structure in relation to basins and aquatic habitat structure in Pantanal wetlands. Hydrobiologia 579:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadoya T, Suda S, Washitani I (2004) Dragonfly species richness on man-made ponds: effects of pond size and pond age on newly established assemblages. Ecol Res 19:461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kietzka GJ, Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2014) Landscape ecological networks are successful in supporting a diverse dragonfly assemblage. Insect Conserv Divers 8:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinvig RG, Samways MJ (2000) Conserving dragonflies (Odonata) along streams running through commercial forestry. Odonatologica 29:195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutcher TE, Bried JT (2014) Adult Odonata conservatism as an indicator of freshwater wetland condition. Ecol Indic 38:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley SJ (2006) The effects of dispersal and recruitment limitation on community structure of odonates in artificial ponds. Ecography 29:585–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy ED (1990) The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreaux J, da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited. Cemex, Mexico City

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore NW (1997) Status survey and conservation action plan: dragonflies. IUCN/SSC Odonata Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Niba AS, Samways MJ (2006) Remarkable elevational tolerance in an African Odonata larval assemblage. Odonatologica 35:265–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Biggs J, Céréghino R, Grillas P, Joly P, Lachavanne J-B (2005a) Conservation and monitoring of pond diversity: introduction. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 15:535–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli B, Joye DA, Castella E, Juge R, Lehmann A, Lachavanne JB (2005b) PLOCH: a standardised method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in ponds. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosys 15:665–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn R, Samways MJ (1996) Determinants of adult dragonfly assemblage patterns at new ponds in South Africa. Odonatologica 25:49–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Primer-E. (2008) PERMANOVA and Primer 6. Primer-E, Lutton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2009) Conservation of insect assemblages of the Cape Peninsula biodiversity hotspot. J Insect Conserv 13:627–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raebel EM, Merckx T, Feber RE, Riordan P, Thompson DJ, Macdonald DW (2012a) Multi-scale effects of farmland management on dragonfly and damselfly assemblages of farmland ponds. Agric Ecosys Environ 161:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raebel EM, Merckx T, Feber RE, Riordan P, Macdonald DW, Thomson DJ (2012b) Identifying high-quality pond habitats for Odonata in lowland England: implications for agri-environment schemes. Insect Cons Divers 5:422–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo AG, Siegfried WR (1992) Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Cons Biol 6:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosset V, Simaika JP, Arthaud F, Bornette G, Samways MJ, Oertli B, Vallod D (2013) Comparative assessment of scoring methods to evaluate the conservation value of pond and small lake biodiversity. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Biodiv 23:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Richardson DM, Cowling RM, Lloyd JW, Lombard AT (2003) Current patterns of habitat transformation and future threats to biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112:63–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero A, Cereghino R, Figuerola J, Marty P, Angelibert S (2008) Farm ponds make a contribution to the biodiversity of aquatic insects in a French agricultural landscape. Biologies 331:298–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rychla A, Benndorf J, Buczyński P (2011) Impacts of pH and conductivity on species richness and community structure of dragonflies (Odonata) in small mining lakes. Fund Appl Limnol 179:41–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlén G, Ekestubbe K (2001) Identification of drsagonflies as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodivers Conserv 10:673–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1989a) Farm dams as nature reserves for dragonflies (Odonata) at various altitudes in the Natal Drakensberg, South Africa. Biol Conserv 48:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1989b) Taxon turnover in Odonata across a 3000 m altitudinal gradient in southern Africa. Odonatologica 18:263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2003) Threats to the tropical island dragonfly fauna (Odonata) of Mayotte, Comoro Archipelago. Biodivers Conserv 12:1785–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2008) Dragonflies and Damselflies of South Africa. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Grant PBC (2006) Honing Red List assessments of lesser-known taxa in biodiversity hotspots. Biodivers Conserv 16:2575–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Niba AS (2010) Climate and elevation range of South African dragonfly assemblage. BioRisk 5:85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Sharratt NJ (2010) Recovery of endemic dragonflies after removal of invasive alien trees. Conserv Biol 24:267–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Simaika JP (2016) Handbook of freshwater health: the dragonfly Biotic Index for South Africa. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Steytler NS (1996) Dragonfly (Odonata) distribution patterns in urban and forest landscapes, and recommendations for riparian management. Biol Conserv 78:279–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Caldwell PM, Osborn R (1996) Spatial patterns of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators for design of a conservation pond. Odonatologica 25:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Taylor S, Tarboton W (2005) Extinction reprieve following alien removal. Conserv Biol 19:1329–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ, Sharratt NJ, Simaika JP (2011) Effect of alien riparian vegetation and its removal on a highly endemic river macroinvertebrate community. Biol Invasions 13:1305–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scher O, Thiery A (2005) Odonata, amphibia and environmental characteristics in motorway stormwater retention ponds (southern France). Hydrobiologia 551:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler M, Fesl C, Chovanec A (2003) Dragonfly associations (Insecta: odonata) in relation to habitat variables: a multivariate approach. Hydrobiologia 497:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ (2008) Valuing dragonflies as service providers. In: Cordoba-Aguilar A (ed) Dragonflies: model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ (2009) An easy-to-use index of ecological integrity for prioritizing freshwater sites and for assessing habitat quality. Biodivers Conserv 18:1171–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simaika JP, Samways MJ (2011) Comparative assessment of indices of freshwater habitat conditions using different invertebrate taxon sets. Ecol Indic 11:370–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Samways MJ, Taylor S (2006) Assessing riparian quality using two complementary sets of bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 16:2695–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (2004) SPSS Version 13.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart DAB, Samways MJ (1998) Conserving dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages relative to river dynamics in an African savanna game reserve. Conserv Biol 12:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhling F, Martens A (2007) Dragonflies and damselflies of Namibia. Gamsberg Macmillan, Windhoek

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhling F, Sahlén G, Martens A, Marais E, Schütte C (2006) Dragonflies in arid tropical environments: a case study from Western Namibia. Biodivers Conserv 15:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente-Neto F, de Oliveira Roque F, Rodrigues ME, Juen L, Swan CM (2016) Toward a practical use of Neotropical odonates as bioindicators: testing congruence across taxonomic resolution and life stages. Ecol Indic 61:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, Sear D (2003) Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol Conserv 11:329–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Whitefield M, Briggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, Sear D (2004) Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol Conserv 226:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wishart MJ, Day JA (2002) Endemism in the freshwater fauna of the south-western Cape, South Africa. Verhandl Internat Vereinig Theoret Angew Limnol 28:1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of AgriSciences, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    John P. Simaika

  2. Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    Michael J. Samways & Philip P. Frenzel

Authors
  1. John P. Simaika
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael J. Samways
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philip P. Frenzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. Simaika.

Additional information

Communicated by Mark James Kennard.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simaika, J.P., Samways, M.J. & Frenzel, P.P. Artificial ponds increase local dragonfly diversity in a global biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 25, 1921–1935 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1168-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1168-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation