Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation: insights from remote sensing

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important goal of conservation biology is the maintenance of ecosystem processes. Incorporating quantitative measurements of ecosystem functions into conservation practice is important given that it provides not only proxies for biodiversity patterns, but also new tools and criteria for management. In the satellite era, the translation of spectral information into ecosystem functional variables expands and complements the more traditional use of satellite imagery in conservation biology. Remote sensing scientists have generated accurate techniques to quantify ecosystem processes and properties of key importance for conservation planning such as primary production, ecosystem carbon gains, surface temperature, albedo, evapotranspiration, and precipitation use efficiency; however, these techniques are still unfamiliar to conservation biologists. In this article, we identify specific fields where a remotely-sensed characterization of ecosystem functioning may aid conservation science and practice. Such fields include the management and monitoring of species and populations of conservation concern; the assessment of ecosystem representativeness and singularity; the use of protected areas as reference sites to assess global change effects; the implementation of monitoring and warning systems to guide adaptive management; the direct evaluation of supporting ecosystem services; and the planning and monitoring of ecological restorations. The approaches presented here illustrate feasible ways to incorporate the ecosystem functioning dimension into conservation through the use of satellite-derived information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcaraz-Segura D (2008) Remote sensing of ecosystem functioning in the Iberian Peninsula. Groundworks for biodiversity conservation in the face of global change effects. Universidad de Almería

  • Alcaraz-Segura D, Paruelo JM, Cabello J (2006) Identification of current ecosystem functional types in the Iberian Peninsula. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz-Segura D, Baldi G, Durante P, Garbulsky MF (2008a) Análisis de la dinámica temporal del NDVI en áreas protegidas: tres casos de estudio a distintas escalas espaciales, temporales y de gestión. Ecosistemas 17:108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz-Segura D, Cabello J, Paruelo JM, Delibes M (2008b) Trends in the surface vegetation dynamics of the National Parks of Spain as observed by satellite sensors. Appl Veg Sci 11:431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz-Segura D, Cabello J, Paruelo J (2009a) Baseline characterization of major Iberian vegetation types based on the NDVI dynamics. Plant Ecol 202:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcaraz-Segura D, Cabello J, Paruelo JM, Delibes M (2009b) Use of descriptors of ecosystem functioning for monitoring a national park network: a remote sensing approach. Environ Manage 43:38–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 384

  • Armsworth PR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Kremen C, Ricketts TH, Sanjayan MA (2007) Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conserv Biol 21:1383–1384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP, Margules CR (1986) Assessing representativeness. In: Usher MB (ed) Wildlife conservation evaluation. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 45–67

  • Bala G, Caldeira K, Wickett M, Phillips TJ, Lobell DB, Delire C, Mirin A (2007) Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6550–6555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsen BJ, Tveraa T (2012) Density-dependence vs. density-independence—linking reproductive allocation to population abundance and vegetation greenness. J Anim Ecol 81:364–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boone RB, Thirgood SJ, Hopcraft JGC (2006) Serengeti wildebeest migratory patterns modeled from rainfall and new vegetation growth. Ecology 87:1987–1994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1992) Population viability analysis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:481–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabello J, Alcaraz-Segura D, Altesor A, Delibes M, Liras E (2008) Funcionamiento ecosistémico y evaluación de prioridades geográficas en conservación. Ecosistemas 17:53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan TV, Björn LO, Chernov Y, Chapin T, Christensen TR, Huntley B, Ims RA, Johansson M, Jolly D, Jonasson S, Matveyeva N, Panikov N, Oechel W, Shaver G (2004) Effects on the function of arctic ecosystems in the short- and long-term perspectives. Ambio 33:448–458

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callicott JB, Crowder LB, Mumford K (1999) Current normative concepts in conservation. Conserv Biol 13:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caride C, Piñeiro G, Paruelo JM (2012) How does agricultural management modify ecosystem services in the argentine Pampas? The effects on soil C dynamics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 154:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Folke C (2006) Ecology for transformation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland EE, Chuine I, Menzel A, Mooney HA, Schwartz MD (2007) Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol Evol 22:357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coops NC, Wulder MA, Iwanicka D (2009) Demonstration of a satellite-based index to monitor habitat at continental-scales. Ecol Ind 9:948–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree R, Potter C, Mullen R, Sheldon J, Huang S, Harmsen J, Rodman A, Jean C (2009) A modeling and spatio-temporal analysis framework for monitoring environmental change using NPP as an ecosystem indicator. Remote Sens Environ 113:1486–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Ind 1:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Stolton S, Belokurov A, Krueger L, Lopoukhine N, MacKinnon K, Sandwith T, Sekhran N (2010) Natural Solutions: Protected areas helping people cope with climate change. IUCNWCPA, TNC, UNDP, WCS, The World Bank and WWF, Gland, Switzerland, Washington DC and New York, USA, p 130

  • Durante P, Oyonarte C, Valladares F (2009) Influence of land-use types and climatic variables on seasonal patterns of NDVI in Mediterranean Iberian ecosystems. Appl Veg Sci 12:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duro DC, Coops NC, Wulder MA, Han T (2007) Development of a large area biodiversity monitoring system driven by remote sensing. Prog Phys Geogr 31:235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B, Knight AT, Cowling RM, van Jaarsveld AS, Welz A (2007) Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol Econ 63:714–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld JG (2000) Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restor Ecol 8:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang JY, Piao SL, Zhou LM, He JS, Wei FY, Myneni RB, Tucker CJ, Tan K (2005) Precipitation patterns alter growth of temperate vegetation. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL024231

  • Feldpausch TR, Rondon MA, Fernandes ECM, Riha SJ, Wandelli E (2004) Carbon and nutrient accumulation in secondary forests regenerating on pastures in central Amazonia. Ecol Appl 14:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández N, Paruelo JM, Delibes M (2010) Ecosystem functioning of protected and altered Mediterranean environments: a remote sensing classification in Doñana, Spain. Remote Sens Environ 114:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer DT, Still CJ, Williams AP (2009) Significance of summer fog and overcast for drought stress and ecological functioning of coastal California endemic plant species. J Biogeogr 36:783–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J (2010) Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 16:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid CLJ, Paramor OAL, Brockington S, Bremner J (2008) Incorporating ecological functioning into the designation and management of marine protected areas. Hydrobiologia 606:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbulsky MF, Paruelo JM (2004) Remote sensing of protected areas to derive baseline vegetation functioning characteristics. J Veg Sci 15:711–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García M, Oyonarte C, Villagarcía L, Contreras S, Domingo F, Puigdefabregas J (2008) Monitoring land degradation risk using ASTER data: the non-evaporative fraction as an indicator of ecosystem function. Remote Sens Environ 112:3720–3736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie TW, Foody GM, Rocchini D, Giorgi AP, Saatchi S (2008) Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog Phys Geogr 32:203–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman RL, Tallis H, Kareiva P, Daily GC (2008) Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9445–9448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gower ST, Kucharik CJ, Norman JM (1999) Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, f(APAR), and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 70:29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande JM, Serrano D, Tavecchia G, Carrete M, Ceballos O, Diaz-Delgado R, Tella JL, Donazar JA (2009) Survival in a long-lived territorial migrant: effects of life-history traits and ecological conditions in wintering and breeding areas. Oikos 118:580–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigera G, Oesterheld M, Pacin F (2007) Monitoring forage production for farmers’ decision making. Agric Syst 94:637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall FG, Huemmrich KF, Goetz SJ, Sellers PJ, Nickeson JE (1992) Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance: success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE. J Geophys Res Atmos 97:19061–19089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley AJ, Nelson A, Mayaux P, Grégoire J-M (2007) The assessment of african protected areas. Luxembourg, p 77

  • Haslett JR, Berry PM, Bela G, Jongman RHG, Pataki G, Samways MJ, Zobel M (2010) Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodivers Conserv 19(10):2963–2977

    Google Scholar 

  • Havstad KM, Herrick JE (2003) Long-term ecological monitoring. Arid Land Res Manag 17:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Yang M, Pan Y, Zhu W (2005) Measurement of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China based on remote sensing. In: International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), pp 2965–2968

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horning N, Robinson JA, Sterling EJ, Turner W, Spector S (2010) Remote sensing for ecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83:195–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert AH, Haskell JP (2003) The effect of energy and seasonality on avian species richness and community composition. Am Nat 161:83–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ito TY, Miura N, Lhagvasuren B, Enkhbileg D, Takatsuki S, Tsunekawa A, Jiang ZW (2005) Preliminary evidence of a barrier effect of a railroad on the migration of Mongolian gazelles. Conserv Biol 19:945–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jax K (2010) Ecosystem functioning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R, Bedford WB (1973) The use of natural areas to establish environmental baselines. Biol Conserv 5:168–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobbagy EG, Sala OE, Paruelo JM (2002) Patterns and controls of primary production in the Patagonian steppe: a remote sensing approach. Ecology 83:307–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien Y, Sobrino JA (2009) The yearly land cover dynamics (YLCD) method: an analysis of global vegetation from NDVI and LST parameters. Remote Sens Environ 113:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Ostrovsky M (2003) From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol Evol 18(6):299–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001) Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korb JE, Fule PZ (2008) Intra- and interannual vegetation change: implications for long-term research. Restor Ecol 16:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kustas W, Anderson M (2009) Advances in thermal infrared remote sensing for land surface modeling. Agric For Meteorol 149:2071–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon JRR, van Leeuwen WJD, Casady GM (2012) Using MODIS-NDVI for the modeling of post-wildfire vegetation response as a function of environmental conditions and pre-fire restoration treatments. Remote Sens 4:598–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang S (2000) Narrowband to broadband conversions of land surface albedo. I Algorithms. Remote Sens Environ 76:213–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Hunter M (2010) Some guiding concepts for conservation biology. Conserv Biol 24:1459–1468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons EA, Jin Y, Randerson JT (2008) Changes in surface albedo after fire in boreal forest ecosystems of interior Alaska assessed using MODIS satellite observations. J Geophys Res G Biogeosci 113:G02012. doi:10.1029/2007JG000606

  • Mackey BG, Nix HA, Stein JA, Cork SE, Bullen FT (1989) Assessing the representativeness of the wet tropics of Queensland world heritage property. Biol Conserv 50:279–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhusudan MD (2004) Recovery of wild large herbivores following livestock decline in a tropical Indian wildlife reserve. J Appl Ecol 41(5):858–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmstrom CM, Butterfield HS, Barber C, Dieter B, Harrison R, Qi J, Riaño D, Schrotenboer A, Stone S, Stoner CJ, Wirka J (2009) Using remote sensing to evaluate the influence of grassland restoration activities on ecosystem forage provisioning services. Restor Ecol 17:526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manseau M, Huot J, Crete M (1996) Effects of summer grazing by caribou on composition and productivity of vegetation: community and landscape level. J Ecol 84:503–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Oesterheld M, Frank DA, Williams KJ (1989) Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341:142–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meine C, Soule M, Noss RF (2006) “A mission-driven discipline”: the growth of conservation biology. Conserv Biol 20:631–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melesse AM, Oberg J, Nangia V, Beeri O, Baumgartner D (2006) Spatiotemporal dynamics of evapotranspiration at the Glacial Ridge prairie restoration in northwestern Minnesota. Hydrol Process 20:1451–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson LA, Baron J, Melillo JM, Naiman RJ, O’Malley RI, Orians G, Palmer MA, Pfaff ASP, Running SW, Sala OE (2005) Aggregate measures of ecosystem services: can we take the pulse of nature? Front Ecol Environ 3:56–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mildrexler DJ, Zhao MS, Running SW (2009) Testing a MODIS Global Disturbance Index across North America. Remote Sens Environ 113:2103–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1977) Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 281:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran MS, Jackson RD (1991) Assessing the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration using remotely sensed inputs. J Environ Qual 20:725–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller T, Olson KA, Dressler G, Leimgruber P, Fuller TK, Nicolson C, Novaro AJ, Bolgeri MJ, Wattles D, DeStefano S, Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2011) How landscape dynamics link individual- to population-level movement patterns: a multispecies comparison of ungulate relocation data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:683–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musiega DE, Kazadi S-N (2004) Simulating the East African wildebeest migration patterns using GIS and remote sensing. Afr J Ecol 42:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S (2002) Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the evolution of a paradigm. Ecology 83:1537–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagler PL, Scott RL, Westenburg C, Cleverly JR, Glenn EP, Huete AR (2005) Evapotranspiration on western U.S. rivers estimated using the Enhanced Vegetation Index from MODIS and data from eddy covariance and Bowen ratio flux towers. Remote Sens Environ 97:337–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagler PL, Glenn EP, Didan K, Osterberg J, Jordan F, Cunningham J (2008) Wide-area estimates of stand structure and water use of Tamarix spp. on the Lower Colorado River: implications for restoration and water management projects. Restor Ecol 16:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9495–9500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nemani R, Hashimoto H, Votava P, Melton F, Wang W, Michaelis A, Mutch L, Milesi C, Hiatt S, White M (2009) Monitoring and forecasting ecosystem dynamics using the Terrestrial Observation and Prediction System (TOPS). Remote Sens Environ 113:1497–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosetto MD, Jobbagy EG, Paruelo JM (2005) Land-use change and water losses: the case of grassland afforestation across a soil textural gradient in central Argentina. Glob Change Biol 11:1101–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterheld M, Sala OE, McNaughton SJ (1992) Effect of animal husbandry on herbivore-carrying capacity at a regional scale. Nature 356:234–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterheld M, DiBella CM, Kerdiles H (1998) Relation between NOAA-AVHRR satellite data and stocking rate in grasslands. Ecol Appl 8:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollinger SV, Richardson AD, Martin ME, Hollinger DY, Frolking SE, Reich PB, Plourde LC, Katul GG, Munger JW, Oren R, Smith M-L, Paw UKT, Bolstad PV, Cook BD, Day MC, Martin TA, Monson RK, Schmid HP (2008) Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: functional relations and potential climate feedbacks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19336–19341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otterman J, Karnieli A, Brakke T, Koslowsky D, Bolle H-J, Starr D, Schmidt H (2002) Desert scrub optical density and spectral-albedo ratios of impacted-to-protected areas by model inversion. Int J Remote Sens 23:3959–3970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overton JM, Leathwick JR (2001) Measuring ecological distinctiveness. Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand

  • Oyonarte C, Alcaraz-Segura D, Oyarzabal M, Paruelo JM, Cabello J (2010) Sistema de apoyo a la gestión de reservas de la biosfera basado en el monitoreo de la productividad primaria: ensayo en Cabo de Gata-Níjar (Almería-España). In: Araya P, Clüsener-Godt M (eds) Reservas de la Biosfera: Su contribución a la provisión de servicios de los ecosistemas. Experiencias exitosas en Iberoamérica, UNESCO, Paris, pp 119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC, Sala OE (1999) Grassland precipitation-use efficiency varies across a resource gradient. Ecosystems 2:64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Jobbagy EG, Sala OE (2001) Current distribution of ecosystem functional types in temperate South America. Ecosystems 4:683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Piñeiro G, Oyonarte C, Alcaraz-Segura D, Cabello J, Escribano P (2005) Temporal and spatial patterns of ecosystem functioning in protected and areas in southeastern Spain. Appl Veg Sci 8:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paruelo JM, Putz S, Weber G, Bertiller M, Golluscio RA, Aguiar MR, Wiegand T (2008) Long-term dynamics of a semiarid grass steppe under stochastic climate and different grazing regimes: a simulation analysis. J Arid Environ 72:2211–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelkey NW, Stoner CJ, Caro TM (2000) Vegetation in Tanzania: assessing long term trends and effects of protection using satellite imagery. Biol Conserv 94:297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira HM, David Cooper H (2006) Towards the global monitoring of biodiversity change. Trends Ecol Evol 21:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20:503–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Pelletier F, von Hardenberg A, Festa-Bianchet M, Cote SD (2007) Early onset of vegetation growth vs. rapid green-up: impacts on juvenile mountain ungulates. Ecology 88:381–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Ryan S, Mueller T, Bunnefeld N, Jedrzejewska B, Lima M, Kausrud K (2011) The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Clim Res 46:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer M, Disney M, Quaife T, Marchant R (2012) Terrestrial ecosystems from space: a review of earth observation products for macroecology applications. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:603–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips LB, Hansen AJ, Flather CH (2008) Evaluating the species energy relationship with the newest measures of ecosystem energy: NDVI versus MODIS primary production (vol 112, p 3538, 2008). Remote Sens Environ 112:4380

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips LB, Hansen AJ, Flather CH, Robison-Cox J (2010) Applying species-energy theory to conservation: a case study for North American birds. Ecol Appl 20:2007–2023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piñeiro G, Oesterheld M, Paruelo JM (2006) Seasonal variation in aboveground production and radiation-use efficiency of temperate rangelands estimated through remote sensing. Ecosystems 9:357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter CS, Brooks V (1998) Global analysis of empirical relations between annual climate and seasonality of NDVI. Int J Remote Sens 19:2921–2948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen HB, Wittemyer G, Douglas-Hamilton I (2006) Predicting time-specific changes in demographic processes using remote-sensing data. J Appl Ecol 43:366–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed BC, Brown JF, Vanderzee D, Loveland TR, Merchant JW, Ohlen DO (1994) Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery. J Veg Sci 5:703–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez C, Bustamante J (2003) The effect of weather on lesser kestrel breeding success: can climate change explain historical population declines? J Anim Ecol 72:793–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouget M, Cowling RM, Pressey RL, Richardson DM (2003) Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Divers Distrib 9:191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruimy A, Saugier B, Dedieu G (1994) Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. J Geophys Res 99:5263–5283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Jaén MC, Mitchell Aide T (2005) Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success. For Ecol Manage 218:159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running SW, Nemani RR, Heinsch FA, Zhao M, Reeves M, Hashimoto H (2004) A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54:547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaub M, Kania W, Koppen U (2005) Variation of primary production during winter induces synchrony in survival rates in migratory white storks Ciconia ciconia. J Anim Ecol 74:656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonewald-Cox C (1988) Boundaries in the protection of nature reserves. Bioscience 38:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Wilcox B (1980) Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland

  • Tang Z, Fang J, Sun J, Gaston KJ (2011) Effectiveness of protected areas in maintaining plant production. PLoS ONE 6(4):e19116

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuanmu MN, Vina A, Roloff GJ, Liu W, Ouyang ZY, Zhang HM, Liu JG (2011) Temporal transferability of wildlife habitat models: implications for habitat monitoring. J Biogeogr 38:1510–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8:127–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Ritts WD, Cohen WB, Gower ST, Running SW, Zhao M, Costa MH, Kirschbaum AA, Ham JM, Saleska SR, Ahl DE (2006) Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes. Remote Sens Environ 102:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuxen KA, Schile LM, Kelly M, Siegel SW (2008) Vegetation colonization in a restoring tidal marsh: a remote sensing approach. Restor Ecol 16:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verboom J, Schippers P, Cormont A, Sterk M, Vos CC, Opdam PFM (2010) Population dynamics under increasing environmental variability: implications of climate change for ecological network design criteria. Landsc Ecol 25:1289–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia RA, Wall DH, Levin SA (2001) Principles of ecosystem function. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 345–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Volante JN, Alcaraz-Segura D, Mosciaro MJ, Viglizzo EF, Paruelo JM (2012) Ecosystem functional changes associated with land clearing in NW Argentina. Agric Ecosyst Environ 154:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of natural resources. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Wiegand T, Naves J, Garbulsky MF, Fernandez N (2008) Animal habitat quality and ecosystem functioning: exploring seasonal patterns using NDVI. Ecol Monogr 78:87–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittemyer G (2011) Effects of economic downturns on mortality of wild African Elephants. Conserv Biol 25:1002–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittemyer G, Rasmussen HB, Douglas-Hamilton I (2007) Breeding phenology in relation to NDVI variability in free-ranging African elephant. Ecography 30:42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerger A, McIntyre S, Gobbett D, Stol J (2011) Remote detection of grassland nutrient status for assessing ground layer vegetation condition and restoration potential of eucalypt grassy woodlands. Landsc Urban Plan 102:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank José María Iriondo and Francisco Lloret for their helpful comments. This paper is the result of two symposiums supported by the Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores (AECID) (Project “Red temática para la evaluación del impacto de los cambios globales (vs locales) en el funcionamiento ecosistémico”). Financial support was also provided by FEDER funds, Junta de Andalucía (projects RNM-6685 and SEGALERT P09-RNM-5048), Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales (project 066/2007), Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Proyecto CGL2010-22314) and Fundación MAPFRE (2008 call for projects).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javier Cabello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cabello, J., Fernández, N., Alcaraz-Segura, D. et al. The ecosystem functioning dimension in conservation: insights from remote sensing. Biodivers Conserv 21, 3287–3305 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0370-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0370-7

Keywords

Navigation