Abstract
The goal of the Global strategy for plant conservation (GSPC) was to protect 50 % of the most important areas for plant diversity by 2010; such areas are defined as the most important places in the world for wild plant diversity, identified according to common criteria. Although the concept of complementarity is intrinsically included in the GSPC, it is not widely used in the IPA definition process. We compared the results of a criteria-based selection approach to the identification of the Important Plant Areas with those of a systematic conservation approach to assess the benefits of integrating these two methods. The criteria-based definition was composed of a ranking procedure that identified 351 top ranking cells containing high conservation value species/habitats and/or richness. The complementarity approach selected 265 cells. The results were compared in terms of beta-diversity and land cover. A weak, though significant association emerged between the results; moreover, the criteria-based approach unexpectedly proved to be more effective in selecting beta-diversity than the complementarity approach. In terms of land cover composition, the cells proposed by the two selection methods differed significantly, with the criteria-based approach selecting natural and seminatural areas and the complementarity approach selecting agricultural areas. The comparison of the two approaches that are used to define Important Plant Areas on a national scale demonstrated that the explicit inclusion of the systematic conservation approach in the IPA process may help to integrate the designation of IPAs, to locate critical areas and address the needed further investigations in selected zones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abellán P, Sànchez-Fèrnandes D, Velasco J et al (2005) Conservation of fresh water biodiversity: a comparison of different area selection methods. Biodivers Conserv 14:3457–3474
Al-Abbasi TM, Al-Farhan A, Al-Khulaidi AW, Hall M, Llewellyn OA, Miller AG, Patzelt A (2010) Important plant areas in the Arabian Peninsula. Edinb J Bot 67:25–35
Anderson S (2002) Identifying important plant areas: a site selection manual for Europe. Plantlife International, London
Anderson S, Kusik T, Radford EA (2005) Important plant areas in central and Eastern Europe. Plantlife International, London
Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, Mc Ardle BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9:683–693
Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke RK (2008) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods. PRIMER-E, Plymouth
Andron JA, Possingham HP, Klein CJ (2008) Marxan good practices handbook external review version; 17 may 2008. Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Vancouver
Ball I, Possingham H, Watts M (2009) Marxan and relatives: software for spatial conservation prioritisation. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham H (eds) Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D et al (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150
Blasi C, Boitani L, La Posta S, Manes F, Marchetti M (eds) (2007) Biodiversity in Italy. Contribution to the national biodiversity strategy. Palombi Editori, Roma. ISBN 88-7621-514-X http://94.86.40.85/export/sites/default/archivio/biblioteca/protezione_natura/dpn_biodiversita_italia_eng.zip. Accessed April 2012
Blasi C, Zavattero L, Marignani M et al (2008) The concept of land ecological network and its design using a land unit approach. Plant Biosyst 142(3):540–549
Blasi C, Marignani M, Copiz R et al. (2009) Mapping the important plant areas in Italy Palombi editori srl, Roma http://wwwminambienteit/export/sites/default/archivio/biblioteca/protezione_natura/dpn_important_plant_areas_italypdf. Accessed April 2012
Blasi C, Marignani M, Copiz R et al (2011) Important plant areas in Italy: from data to mapping. Biol Conserv 144(1):220–226
Branquart E, Verheyen K, Latham J (2008) Selection criteria of protected forest areas in Europe: the theory and the real world. Biol Conserv 141:2795–2806
Capotorti G, Guida D, Siervo V, Smiraglia D, Blasi C (2012) Ecological classification of land and conservation of biodiversity at the national level: the case of Italy. Biol Conserv. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.12.028
Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni PV et al (2010) Non-native flora of Italy: species distribution and threats. Plant Biosyst 144(1):12–28
Chiarucci A, Bacaro G, Rocchini D (2008) Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: old ideas and new proposals. Biol Cons 141(10):2608–2618
Chown SI, Rodrigues AS, Gremmen NJM et al (2001) World heritage status of and conservation of Southern Ocean Islands. Conserv Biol 15:550–557
Corona P, Calvani P, Mugnozza GS et al (2008) Modelling natural forest expansion on a landscape level by multinomial logistic regression. Plant Biosyst 142(3):509–517
Cowling RM, Pressey RL, Sims-Castley R et al (2003) The expert or the algorithm?-comparison of priority conservation areas in the Cape Floristic region identified by park managers and reserve selection software. Biol Conserv 112:147–167
Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2007) Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landsc Ecol 22:617–631
Frondoni R, Mollo B, Capotorti G (2011) A landscape analysis of land cover change in the municipality of Rome (Italy): spatio-temporal characteristics and ecological implications of land cover transitions from 1954 to 2001. Landsc Urban Plan 100:117–128
Game ET, Grantham HS (2008) Marxan user manual for Marxan version 1810. University of Queensland, St Lucia. Queensland and Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association, Vancouver
Grand J, Cummings MP, Rebelo TG et al (2007) Biased data reduce the efficiency of conservation reserve networks. Ecol Lett 10:364–374
Leathwick JR, Moilanen A, Ferrier S et al (2010) Complementarity-based conservation prioritization using a community classification, and its application to riverine systems. Biol Conserv 143:984–991
Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Boitani L (2006) Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape. Biol Conserv 133(4):455–473
Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO et al (2007) Contribution of the natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444
Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Boitani L (2008) Size-dependent resistance of protected areas to land-use change. Proc R Soc Biol Sci 275:1297–1304
Martellos S, Attorre F, De Felici S et al (2011) Plant sciences and the Italian National biodiversity network. Plant Biosyst 145(4):758–761
Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham H (eds) (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858
Palmer M, Smart J (2001) Guidelines to the selection of important plant areas in Europe. Planta Europa, London
Pressey RL, Cowling RM (2001) Reserve selection algorithms and the real world. Conserv Biol 15:275–277
Radford EA, Odé B (eds) (2009) Conserving important plant areas: investing in the green gold of South East Europe. Plantlife International, Salisbury
Radford EA, Catullo G, Montmollin Bde (eds) (2011) Important plant areas of the south and east Mediterranean region: priority sites for conservation. IUCN, Gland/Malaga, pp VIII + 108
Rosati L, Marignani M, Blasi C (2008) A gap analysis comparing natura 2000 vs national protected area network with potential natural vegetation. Community Ecol 9(2):147–154
Ruhl J, Caruso T, Giucastro M, la Mantia T (2011) Olive agroforestry systems in Sicily: cultivated typologies and secondary succession processes after abandonment. Plant Biosyst 145(1):120–130
Simaika JP, Samways MJ (2009) Reserve selection using red listed taxa in three global biodiversity hotspots: dragonflies in South Africa. Biol Conserv 142:638–651
Williams PH, Margules CR, Hilbert DW (2002) Data requirements and data sources for biodiversity priority area selection. J Biosci 27:327–338
Acknowledgments
This research would not have been possible without the work of the numerous experts involved in the “Important Plant Areas in Italy” project promoted by the Italian Ministry for the Environment, Nature Protection Directorate and coordinated by the Inter-university research centre for “Biodiversity, Plant sociology and Landscape Ecology” of the “Sapienza” University of Rome. The authors also wish to thank M. Fipaldini, R.Copiz, E. Del Vico, L. Rosati and L. Zavattero for their scientific and technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marignani, M., Blasi, C. Looking for important plant areas: selection based on criteria, complementarity, or both?. Biodivers Conserv 21, 1853–1864 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0283-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0283-5